Wikipedia:Featured article review/Nancy Reagan/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: User talk:Happyme22, User talk:Wasted Time R, all wikiprojects on talk page, diff for talk page notification
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because the "Article does not seem to be well-researched or comprehensive. There's too much reliance on news stories as opposed to scholarly sources or retrospectives such as the Benze biography." Another issue I noticed is POV issues such as "Although the bill was criticized", and where characterization of Just Say No program as ineffective is attributed to "critics" and not mentioned in the lead. However, the (in)effectiveness of the program has been empirically measured. This is a widely viewed article so I hope someone will step up to improve it. (t · c) buidhe 04:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC minimal improvement (t · c) buidhe 04:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC minimal improvement of the article since its nomination. I am concerned about some of the sources used, and it seems like lots of sources and information has been added since its FAC, so these will need to be checked for their quality and accuracy. Z1720 (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, comprehensiveness, and neutrality. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:42, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist lack of improvement, issues still present (t · c) buidhe 14:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: sourcing concerns remain, and no significant edits since FAR nom. Z1720 (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, sadly. no engagement and an underuse of scholarly literature. Hog Farm Talk 18:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.