Wikipedia:Featured article review/Tim Duncan/archive1
Appearance
Tim Duncan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: WikiProject National Basketball Association, [diff for talk page notification]
Back in September, I messaged on the talk page about concerns regarding the article. It was promoted to FA last 2007, and has been 17 years since. Now, the article has issues about prose and sourcing. No responses on the talk page. ScarletViolet tc 14:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more details per WP:FAR, specifically:
Nominators must specify the featured article criteria that are at issue and should propose remedies.
Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)- Some of the paragraphs lack citations. Also, what makes slamduncan.com and jockbio.com reliable sources? ScarletViolet tc 08:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- If I look at the current version, every paragraph in the body has at least one citation (and most have more). Sports Illustrated said SlamDuncan.com was his personal website.[1] JockBio had no objections at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126 § Jockbio.com. —Bagumba (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Some of the paragraphs lack citations. Also, what makes slamduncan.com and jockbio.com reliable sources? ScarletViolet tc 08:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)