Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of premiers of British Columbia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:51, 13 December 2008 [1].
Image issues were resolved here. This is a co-nomination with User:Arctic.gnome. Gary King (talk) 04:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment
- I think you should've asked Arctic.gnome if you can nominate this article before actually nominating it, since I think Arctic.gnome is the main contributor of this article. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 05:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- I'm actively working with him on these Premier articles to form a topic. We are both working together on this. Gary King (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you both are working on this article, then I think both of you should deserve the nomination. I'm sure if you ask him to co-nominate with you, he'll gladly accept. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 06:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- I don't mind a co-nomination, but didn't you already ask and get a response? Kind of strange that you would suggest doing it when you already asked and went through this. Gary King (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just truly want Arctic.gnome to have credit for his work on the article. That's all. I don't want to have credit for this as I only re-wrote the dates, and wrote the last paragraph. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 23:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Added and left a note on his page. Gary King (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, it looks as good as the other premier lists. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added and left a note on his page. Gary King (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just truly want Arctic.gnome to have credit for his work on the article. That's all. I don't want to have credit for this as I only re-wrote the dates, and wrote the last paragraph. -- SRE.K.A
- I don't mind a co-nomination, but didn't you already ask and get a response? Kind of strange that you would suggest doing it when you already asked and went through this. Gary King (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you both are working on this article, then I think both of you should deserve the nomination. I'm sure if you ask him to co-nominate with you, he'll gladly accept. -- SRE.K.A
- I'm actively working with him on these Premier articles to form a topic. We are both working together on this. Gary King (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support My only issue with the article (that wasn't fixed) at the last FLC was the images, but they have been resolved, so I believe this article now meets all criteria. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Sources looks good, checked with the Checklinks tool. Cannibaloki 03:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.