Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Zimbabwean national cricket captains/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: Open 9 days, significant problems addressed. Withdrawn -- Scorpion0422 21:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article fails criteria 1c because all of the current refs just link to a news or information site and don't give any specific pages. Thus, the information is not verifiable. -- Scorpion0422 15:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep listed Now fixed. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The lead needs expanding and my concerns about this article are similar to the ones I mentioned here. -- Scorpion0422 17:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead expanded. Can you explain what a general reference would be, and how it would be clear which citation referred to which table? Sam Korn (smoddy) 17:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The title of the ref usually should be indicative of what table it sources. Or, you could do something like what is done here. -- Scorpion0422 18:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgive me if I am being inestimably dull, but I don't see how either of the articles you have pointed to is relevant to this page. This page has different references for each of the different tables. Those have one table for each page. Are there any other concerns on this list? Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, thanks for fixing that. Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, now you just need citations for the text at the beginning of the various sections. -- Scorpion0422 18:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added a reference for the only statement that I can imagine needed one. Do you have any others in mind? Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, now you just need citations for the text at the beginning of the various sections. -- Scorpion0422 18:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, thanks for fixing that. Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgive me if I am being inestimably dull, but I don't see how either of the articles you have pointed to is relevant to this page. This page has different references for each of the different tables. Those have one table for each page. Are there any other concerns on this list? Sam Korn (smoddy) 18:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The title of the ref usually should be indicative of what table it sources. Or, you could do something like what is done here. -- Scorpion0422 18:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead expanded. Can you explain what a general reference would be, and how it would be clear which citation referred to which table? Sam Korn (smoddy) 17:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I guess you got them all. -- Scorpion0422 18:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I no longer have any large concerns about the article. However, I am going to leave this review open so that others will have a chance to comment. -- Scorpion0422 20:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Much improved - If there are no other objections, keep. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Looks good to me. Drewcifer (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]