Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Varanus komodoensis4

Nominate and support. - Raul654 21:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I must oppose. The picture doesn't have a caption and isn't adding much to the article (it's tacked onto the end). See WP:WIAFP (number 4). Broken S 21:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much missing (like both rear legs) - Adrian Pingstone 21:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not striking PPGMD 21:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The background is a bit too choppy, lighting is poor on parts of the Komodo, and the rock's hiding too much of it. - JPM | 21:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above. Alr 01:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I also agree with comments above.--Ali K 05:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I would've preferred to see the bits of the dragon hidden by the rock. enochlau (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per enochlau and Adrian Pingstone. Dylan 13:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Calderwood 10:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]