Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Alfred Dunhill/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept AIRcorn (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
This article lacks referencing and makes unvalidated statements, for example that Alfred Dunhill married his mistress on the death of his wife. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevenoaks27 (talk • contribs)
- Keep The article is fully sourced with inline citations. (t · c) buidhe 13:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - The only citations issue I can find is ref 14 is to "Royal Society of Arts archives", which is far from specific enough to be considered verifiable. Looks like it needs a light copy edit, but I don't see anything glaring from a quick glance. Hog Farm Bacon 05:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Can't find a mention of this anywhere. There are 27,000 of them so it is not really that notable in any case. AIRcorn (talk) 02:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The referencing looks fine. And although the page is a bit short, it's comprehensive. In fact, I don't see why this reassessment needs to be kept open. epicgenius (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- keep and close - aside from a few refs I can't read, all seems to be in order. Certainly not GAR level. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- 'Keep and close per Lee Vilenski. I could probably find a few things to harp about if I were so inclined, but this is a GA-level article. It's time to close this thing. Hog Farm Bacon 22:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)