Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Book of Abraham/1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result: Delisted. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are several tags on the article including POV tag. I think it should be reassessed. --Seyyed(t-c) 13:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Wow. The article is currently a trainwreck. It's got more banners on it than Times Square, and more flags than the U.N. Building. Structurally, the article reminds me of Beirut; it's full of craters from previous battles, skirmish lines and balkanized sections. Can this article be saved? I have my doubts. Majoreditor (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist in its present form; I think Majoreditor has said pretty much all that can be said. Not all tags are bad, but the layout, organisation, prose, presence of {{fact}} tags, diputes and lists are enough, I believe, that this would be quick-failed were it nominated at WP:GAN. EyeSerene^talk 18:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, this is a definite quick fail, and could have been boldly-delisted instead of coming here. It isn't GA material at the moment, and the tags on the article should tell its editors what to work on! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]