Jump to content

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2023 May 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 23 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 25 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 24

[edit]

Question on Mentioning if a Public Person Speaks Like Another Person

[edit]

In biographies, can we mention that a public person speaks in the same style of, for example, a character from a television show? The reason I am asking if because, since I am new, I was given a practice edit for an actor from the television series "Scorpion". I wanted to describe the way his character speaks as the way a relatively well-known public person speaks.

Starlighsky (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Starlighsky: Only if there is a source for it. Articles reflect what the sources say. You should not put your own opinion into the article. RudolfRed (talk) 01:13, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks Starlighsky (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of SIGCOV at NCORP

[edit]

I've been involved in a deletion discussion where a user presented a number of sources, but what interested me is the meaning of SIGCOV at WP:NCORP, specifically with regards to this article published by The Sunday Times, about a music venue named "the Bird":

IS it The Bird? Yes. Is it plain? No, it’s super fresh.
Sure, this pokey, charmingly DIY room serves drinks from midday, but it’s as much a place for enjoying art and song as it is somewhere to whet the whistle.
The promoters of Friday’s Kanye West concert probably didn’t have The Bird on their venue shortlist, nor are you likely to find a Rembrandt displayed here.
But as an incubator for some of Perth’s more niche artists, The Bird nails it. Psych rockers, quirky illustrators, crate-diggers: these are just some of the people whose handiwork one can admire with a cold – and fairly priced – drink in hand.
A succinct wine list that includes Mitolo pinot grigio ($9 a glass) proves it’s possible, even for venues that aren’t particularly wine-minded, to serve interesting vino at reasonable prices.
The cider and beer range observes a similar mantra with Feral’s Sly Fox summer ale one of four brews available as an $8 pint.
The Bird is also licensed to sell takeaway alcohol, which is handy for revellers keen to kick on once the party’s over.
The bar team, meanwhile, hasn’t gone too crazy with its cocktails, electing instead to stick with dependables such as the Bloody Mary ($17) and Dark ‘n’ Stormy ($20).
Don’t be put off by The Bird’s alternative leanings. Despite championing the non-mainstream, the venue and its staff extend a warm welcome to all, from lone wolves with a midday thirst to parties of dolled-up girls out to paint the town red.
The setting, while sparse, is tidy and clean (except for when smokers light up out the back), the bartenders’ smiles are genuine and The Bird proves originality is alive in Northbridge.
THE DETAILS 181 William St, Northbridge6142 3513 î williamstreetbird.com Mon-Sat, noon-midnight; Sun noon-10pm THE SCORE***1/2

Now, SIGCOV is supposed to not be trivial coverage. The information in the article above is mostly trivial, and the only content that I believe would be acceptable in an article is the fact that the venue (the Bird) exists. But is this what SIGCOV actually means? #Examples of trivial coverage contains a list of trivial coverage that isn't considered to be SIGCOV, but none of the examples match this case. Is a source considered trivial if most of its content cannot be used in an article, or have I got this wrong? Are sources related to corporations and other such entities automatically SIGCOV because they are published in regional newspapers, regardless of their content? Thanks. Nythar (💬-🍀) 03:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nythar: There is already discussion about the sources at that discussion, which you are participating in. Keep the discussion there and see what the consensus becomes. RudolfRed (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't really answer my question. I'm not extending any discussion here; my question is rather simple: can a source that is almost 100% trivial still be SIGCOV with regards to NCORP? I provided that discussion for context, but the question is general. Nythar (💬-🍀) 04:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nythar: A better place perhaps to answer a general question like yours is probably at WT:NCORP since that's where any changes or clarifications of WP:CORPDEPTH are going to need to be discussed. Before you do so, however, you might want to search the NCORP's talk page archives first to see whether a similar question has been asked (and answered) before. Now, a question about whether a specific source qualifies as sigcov could be asked on the relevant article's talk page or at WP:RSN, though I suggest trying the article's talk page first. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's the answer I needed, thanks. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to change back to Vector skin?

[edit]

I have a problem with Wikipedia skin. I am using Opera and in Wikipedia, the skin is MinervaNeue but the preferences mentioned that the skin is in Vector. Is there a way to change to Vector properly?

Edit: I check further, it seems to be an Opera problem. Google Chrome work fine. Yaujj13 (talk) 11:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yaujj13: Go to "Preferences" on the top right, and from there go to the "Appearence" tab. Click on "Vector legacy (2010)" or "Vector (2022)" and then hit "Save." Cheers, Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've solved that. Nythar (💬-🍀) 11:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

I would like to understand why in en.wiki the pages on Italy are, at least apparently, shorter than in it.wiki. I thought it was because, perhaps, in the Wikipedia in Italian language people also tend to write superfluous things. Could you give me an explanation? For goodness' sake, the page on the Italian state ("Italy") is longer than that of the it.wiki (for which I am very very grateful), but many other pages on Italian topics within the Wikipedia in Italian language are richer, at least apparently, than the corresponding pages within en.wiki; you will probably tell me that this is normal, since the it.wiki deals precisely with Italian topics, but en.wiki should be (and in fact is) the richest virtual encyclopaedia in the world, and should therefore also be rich in the pages on Italian topics. JackkBrown (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JackkBrown: That's most likely because the English Wikipedia's policies are one of the strictest out of all the languages. A big one is verifiability, which most likely means that a lot of the sources used over on the Italian Wikipedia are not considered reliable enough to be used on here. This is one of the things would-be translators are told when translating from anything from a non-English Wikipedia to here, as described at WP:TRANSLATEUS § Before you start.[a]Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 12:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown: Don't forget WP:LENGTH. Bazza (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tenryuu: so, if this is the reason, my trust in en.wiki has increased! One question: so can many of the sources on it.wiki really be considered not reliable enough? JackkBrown (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown: there will be information on both en and it.wiki which is either unsourced or unreliably sourced, so the translator should check the sources before publishing a translation. TSventon (talk) 13:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown: Each language's Wikipedia sets its own policies on topics such as verifiability. It is probable that it.wiki and en.wiki have drawn the lines at different places. Orange Mike | Talk 01:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) In addition to {[u|Tenryuu}}'s point above, text lengths vary enormously between different languages. I know very little Italian, but if I may use a French example compare: "quatre-vingt et cinque pommes de terre" with "eighty-five potatoes" – 38 characters as compared with 20 for exactly the same statement (if there are spelling errors in the French it doesn't alter the argument). Martin of Sheffield (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Wikipedia articles are written by people, so if an it Wikipedia article is longer than the en Wikipedia equivalent, it means that the authors have decided to add more content to the it article than the en article. That could be because the it authors are more comfortable writing in Italian or more interested in writing for an Italian speaking audience. TSventon (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Without having looked, one could safely bet that the article about Giorgia Meloni is longer in Italian than in English, the article about Joe Biden longer in English than in Italian, the article about Emmanuel Macron longer in French than in English, and so on. TigraanClick here for my talk page ("private" contact) 09:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tigraan: I checked and no, I cannot agree with you. Bytes of the page in Wikipedia in Italian language on Giorgia Meloni: 102,947; bytes of the page in Wikipedia in English language on Giorgia Meloni: 246,194 (more than double). On Macron page, however, I can agree with you, but only because the page in the Wikipedia in French language is excessively long (longer than any page in the Wikipedia in English language): 435,699 bytes. JackkBrown (talk) 11:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ Although it talks about translating into languages other than English, the principle remains the same.

Issues with a user lacking WP:COMPETENCE

[edit]

I have noticed that there is a user with a poor understanding of forms of English other than their own; they keep changing the content of articles tagged "use British English" to American English based on their belief that only American English uses the suffix -ize and claiming that this meant the articles contained no British English. In British English -ize and -ise are both acceptable, and indeed the Oxford English Dictionary exclusively uses -ize (see: Oxford spelling). I'm just wondering what can be done about it. (examples: [1], [2], [3], [4]) 92.21.251.88 (talk) 13:34, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, tell them about it. Duh. They seem to be responsive on their talk page. If they don't pay attention to WP:ENGVAR after a few reminders only then is an WP:ANI warranted. Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 14:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, have done. 92.21.251.88 (talk) 14:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Twice-rejected AfC article was created by different user without attribution: what to do?

[edit]

I've noticed something strange and wanted to ask what the right venue is to raise this issue: User:JasonWeitz, who has disclosed that they were paid to create an article on David Latimer, created Draft:David_Latimer which was twice rejected in AfC review by @Jamiebuba: first on 5 April 2023, second on 15 April 2023.
Only four days after the second rejection, on 19 April 2023, User:Nutchladsa (SPA whose first action was to create a David Latimer page in their sandbox in February 2023, copied the rejected draft piecewise into their Sandbox and within minutes moved that sandbox article into mainspace.
Around 3 weeks later, JasonWeitz added an image.
A few questions:

  • Is it allowed to move previously rejected drafts without mentioning that they had previously been rejected? This seems like an attempt to hide the draft's history and also a violation of copyright/attribution. Nutchladsa hid the fact that the article was created by a paid contributor.
  • Which venue would be most appropriate to raise this? I've thought of filing an SPI, but they may not be socks. It is possible that only Nutchladsa violated some policy, but I'm not sure which.

Thanks for your help! AncientWalrus (talk) 13:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's assume good faith for the moment. The new article would have been reviewed by the new page patrollers, who tend to pretty quick to draftify or even reject poor material. It is all a bit moot now, since the article has formally been nominated for deletion with discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/David Latimer. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quote (to be inserted in the page "Torta Barozzi")

[edit]

Good morning, how do I include the English translation of this quote?

...Si presenta come una piccola zolla di terra e come una zolla si sbriciola... È un incantevole mistero fatto di mille aromi che confondono il palato in una sinfonia di dolcezza...

I would like to insert it on this page: Torta Barozzi. JackkBrown (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With {{Text and translation}}? Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Michael D. Turnbull: done. JackkBrown (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how to create an article

[edit]

how to create an article Prakash Ulliyeri (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Your first article. Please take note in particular of Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources requirements. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User name

[edit]

Hi, I signed up for an account with the user name FibonARTcci a few years ago, but I can't seem to locate the email address associated with the user name. Is there a way of finding out what the email address is please. Many thanks

Peter Symonds Peterjohnsymonds (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:EmailUser/FibonARTcci
As you were blocked as FibonARTcci (talk · contribs) your Peterjohnsymonds (talk · contribs) account is a block evading sockpuppet. You should abandon the Peterjohnsymonds account and appeal the block on your FibonARTcci account. As it appears you are still trying to promote your business I don't predict any success. Cabayi (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

creating a new page

[edit]

I keep adding in the name of the page I want to create but it won't let me create it. Every time it says "you can create this page but first you have to save it as a draft" but it won't let me save as a draft. Aeiscrei (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aeiscrei As you are a very new editor here, it might be better to edit a few existing articles before you try the much harder task of creating one. H:INTRO gives some general advice and you should certainly use the WP:AfC process (click that link for instructions) after also reading this essay. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:07, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
New editors like yourself are not allowed to create articles directly in mainspace, which is why you were getting the error message. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Aeiscrei, can you tell us the name of the draft you're trying to create? 199.208.172.35 (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently there may be a bit of a problem due to a recent change. See VPT. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete a Wikipedia page that you've created?

[edit]

Can you delete a Wikipedia page that you made yourself? I'm thinking of deleting one of my Wikipedia pages, List of para table tennis tournaments as I feel it's a bit of a waste of space to have on Wikipedia unless it does actually interest other Wikipedia users and viewers who have an interest in para table tennis. I'd like to know how the deletion process works too. Thanks, SarahTHunter (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahTHunter: No. The page is no longer yours. It belongs to the entire community. You have no more (and no less) authority to delete it than any other editor. You may propose it for deletion if you feel it meets one of the deletion criteria. "Wast of space" is not a criterion. the fundamental criterion is notability. If a subject is notable, the page should not be deleted. -Arch dude (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SarahTHunter For the second part of your question, the simplest deletion process, which may be applicable here, is explained at WP:PROD. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, since it was created in 2019, that list has been viewed 1649 times, an average about once daily. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's reassuring! Thank you. SarahTHunter (talk) 16:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing errors on Digamma function

[edit]

Reference help requested. The pdf is avalaible on Arxiv. How can I cite Arxiv? Thanks, Nolord (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nolord There's a specific template for that at {{Cite arXiv}}. It would be wise to revisit the citation once it is no longer a preprint. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Film director of westerns

[edit]

Sergio be 2A00:23C7:99A5:F201:91DB:FF62:1BB4:12A8 (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you looking for Sergio Bergonzelli, IP editor? 199.208.172.35 (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

[edit]

I read the page about it and i'm still confused. Are regular(autoconfirmed) editors allowed to use rollback or not? Blitzfan51 speak to the manager 17:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actual rollback is limited to admins and users who have specially gotten permission to use it. Various tools such as Twinkle, some of which are available to autoconfirmed users, emulate the behavior but are technically a different thing. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qui

[edit]

is Qui usable on chrome. I don't want it to break my browser and I know nothing about javascript. Blitzfan51 speak to the manager 18:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blitzfan51: That sounds like something you should ask at User talk:TheDJ/Qui. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Qui seems to be very old and I wouldn't recommend using it. It probably doesn't work on any of its 'supported browsers' anymore due to deprecation and removal of some features. Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 22:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving user talk pages

[edit]

I was attempting to archive my talk page (diff) when I accidentally set the parameter maxarchivesize to 150 instead of 150k. I have six archives now, but I only want a single one. Retrospectively changing the parameter doesn't fix the issue. Is there a way to solve this? Thanks. Cessaune [talk] 18:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cessaune: It has to be cleaned up manually and only an administrator can delete the unwanted archives. I have deleted them and restored the sections to User talk:Cessaune so they can be archived as wanted in the next bot run. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How Do I Merge Accounts?

[edit]

I used to write here ages ago with another account, forgot my userid, and opened a new account.

How can I merge the accounts?


Starlighsky (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Changing username, accounts can't be merged. You could look into a rename, but I'm not sure how well that will go if you don't have access to your old account, though if you have the same email address you may be alright. I didn't do a lot of digging, but if you have additional questions WP:PING me if you're so inclined and I'll see if I can help further. DonIago (talk) 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Starlighsky (talk) 20:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Death to page?

[edit]

How do I add a date of death to my father's page. He was, James B Busey IV, his date of death is 4/21/2023. Thank you, Angela Presto. ARBPresto (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James B. Busey IV may well have died, but this cannot be added unless there is a reliable source. Since he was notable, there is likely to be news coverage of his death.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find a source, can anyone else help on this?--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ianmacm Me neither, but it also appears from the username that ARB is "Angela R. B. Busey", child of Busey IV but we can't confirm this. The Tips of Apmh 15:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have a feeling that this is true information, but without a source mentioning that he has died, we are stuck.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:47, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found this obituary, but I don't think it's a reliable source, it is a "cremation society". Also note that the date of birth given varies slightly from the one in the James B. Busey IV article (October 2 instead of October 7). I'm really surprised that I was unable to find anything more official. @ARBPresto do you know about any obituaries or reports in newspapers or on official government pages? -- Random person no 362478479 (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Random person no 362478479 About his birth date, citation 3 states his birth date as October 2, we have another one backing that up, and I also found another one too. The reference to his birth date being October 7 is a hard copy that we cannot access. I will work on the article. The Tips of Apmh 19:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]