Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 26

< September 25	September 27 >

September 26

Image:AzizAnsari(CC).jpg

AzizAnsari(CC).jpg - a lower-res version of an image already on commons: Aziz_Ansari_cc.jpg. This inferior image was uploaded by me. Looks like I should have searched Commons first! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Pritchard (talk • contribs) 01:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted as uncontroversial deletion requested by uploader. --Sherool (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GerryAnderson.jpg

and

uploaded by Austenlennon (notify | contribs).

per its talk page OsamaK 03:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image is not used in any articles, and photo-manipulated in a way that renders it unusable (in my opinion) in any encyclopedia articles.- Iamunknown 05:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Prince_Hamzah_and_his_wife_Princess_Noor.jpg

Image:Prince_Hamzah_and_his_wife_Princess_Noor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moonlovejordan (notify | contribs).

Suspect self-made copyright license. I've already found that 7 of this guy's uploads were copyright violations, and I've sent a few others to PUI. At this point, we should just delete all of his uploads over the past couple of days as copyvios. -- RG ² 07:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Petra_city.jpg

Image:Petra_city.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Moonlovejordan (notify | contribs).

Suspect self-made copyright license. I've already found that many of this guy's uploads were copyright violations, and I've sent a few others to PUI. At this point, we should just delete all of his uploads over the past couple of days as copyvios. -- RG ² 07:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Totodog.jpg

Image:Totodog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hypercube (notify | contribs).

Used in Terry (dog), but there is no source to confirm that this is indeed the dog that played Toto in the film (that dog was born in 1933 and died in 1944. It seems more likely, absent any sources being provided, that this is a generic picture of a Cairn Terrier, but again, this would require a source and we already have pictures of Cairn Terriers. I've notified the uploader (who hasn't edited since October 2006), but if no sources are forthcoming, this image should be deleted. Carcharoth 10:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since the image is free, we should just move it to commons. The filename can be changed to something more generic. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC) ......But if the provenance is suspect, it follows that the license is also suspect. — luke 02:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think there is any evidence that the providence is suspect, only that this is probably not the same dog as in the Wizard of Oz. It is true that the image doesn't have a source provided, but that's typical for images that have a free license tag. — Carl (CBM · talk) 17:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - That is a bad thing, actually. Even free images should be verifiable. Carcharoth 10:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - I also think it would be better if "public domain" images had more information on their image description pages, but current practice is to accept the claim at face value unless there is some reason to suspect the image is nonfree. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - *This* may also, in retrospect, have some bearing on Image:Totodog.jpg's license authenticity — luke 17:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The image doesn't look like Terry/Toto to me. I have Cairns and always thought Terry/Toto didn't look like a prototypical Cairn, like this dog does. It shouldn't be difficult to find a fair use image of Terry/Toto with good provenance. 97.80.140.10 15:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And if we are agreed that this is not Toto, then the filename needs changing, as it is misleading. If the filename said "example of the dog breed used to portray Toto", that would be fine. Carcharoth 10:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ali-muljam.jpg

Image:Ali1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Striver (notify | contribs).

Image:Ali2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Striver (notify | contribs).

Image:Ali3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Striver (notify | contribs).

Image:Ali4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Striver (notify | contribs).

Image:Ali-muljam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Striver (notify | contribs).

All are copyrighted art of unknown provenance that appear to have been downloaded off other websites. None provide a sufficient fair use rationale. Uploader appears to have also uploaded numerous other non-free images. — Hex (❝?!❞) 11:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At the very least it demonstrates Shia contempt for Ali. Keep. 134.53.223.156 23:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The images do not have a rationale, but are of importance to the articles. Perhaps someone could write a rationale? Keep. Muhammad Mahdi Karim 08:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As copyrighted images that have been copied without permission, and being of unknown authorship, sufficient rationales cannot be written. — Hex (❝?!❞) 11:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schmidt & Bender P4 Fine reticle.jpg

Image:Schmidt & Bender P4 Fine reticle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Francis Flinch (notify | contribs).

The original is hosted on http://demigodllc.com/photo/SRM-2006.06/?small=B100_1199_img.jpg

assume good faith Francis Flinch 14:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Winner 1.jpg

Image:Winner 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JJJ999 (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic orphan, was uploaded to illustrate a speedily delete d article Pete.Hurd 19:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hardly a reason to delete it, especially if I find a way to reuse the article info within a larger article, as I have now done so.JJJ999 22:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded by Seductivelyanonymous

Unencyclopedic - photos of a broken window and a moldy ceiling at some school. - Mike Rosoft 22:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures do have something to do with the school - Seductivelyanonymous

Unencyclopedic - photos serve as original research and are not being integrated properly with the article. --Runnermonkey 19:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think these pictures should be removed. my daughter has told me about this mold problem and I think everyone should know about it. -WikiFreakAzn —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFreakAzn (talk • contribs) 03:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk page of the original account under which you uploaded the images.

Quote:

Please note that Wikipedia is not a department of complaints; the fact that your school has a broken window or ceiling in some room, etc. is not noteworthy enough to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. (Unleess some newspaper has described the school's state as particularly bad, in which case the claim would be referenced by a link to that article, not by your photos of the problems.) Also please have a look at the image use policy; all images used on Wikipedia must be either under a free license (or in public domain), or usable under a fair use claim (which doesn't apply in your case), and must have their copyright status described using an image copyright tag. Regards, Mike Rosoft 22:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

--Runnermonkey 04:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Picture used on letter notifying Piara singh had died,sent to everyone living in ealing borough.jpg

Image:Picture used on letter notifying Piara singh had died,sent to everyone living in ealing borough.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sanovar (notify | contribs).

Clearly not in user's gift as GFDL. A case could perhaps be made for fair use. Warofdreams talk 23:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]