Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

In review

They suck, but we don't suck them

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose: For saying something of that nature about anyone, or saying that we don't insult them when one part of the motto is "They suck". ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 17:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. I thought about transcluding this motto in here, but it wouldn't have worked very well. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 19:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Do not kill the Great! Ya still want to? There ya go!

Bit long, I suppose.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 08:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very good links. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, I'm a bit annoyed by the "ya"s. *Cremepuff222* 21:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

ReopenedAaaaah, so close.......c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. What Kfc1864 said, only for the second time around. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

How do you describe an edit war over a fencing jacket? Lamé.

A very bad joke. Would like to somehow have the lame/lamé links together, but can't see how to do this without splitting the word in a silly way, like Lamé. Confusing Manifestation 02:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very good. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Nice. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 19:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Reopened,Tad more discussion may be good.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Ha ha! The best and corniest joke I've heard in a while. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 03:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→ In all your fantasies, you always knew
That man and mystery were both in you.

Same as the "Think of Me" motto. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it took me a while, but I understand it. (Parden the cliché, but) It's as cool as grapes. ;) *Cremepuff222* 00:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, Not enough consensus.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Absit iniuria verbis.

From the latin "let injury by words be absent"; too simple maybe? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 19:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. My only irk is that there's no article to explain the meaning. --Tewy 20:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I don´t see anything wrong with it... ♠Tom@sBat 20:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, it's good. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 00:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I would rather not see this reopened, and I'm sure the meaning can be found through a search engine. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Our teachers help us shine!

I've left the Wikipedia link in as it might be a bit confusing otherwise ^-^. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 08:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support But Wikipedia should also make us shine, with the free knowledge it gives us... ♠Tom@sBat 22:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Why not something like "Our teachers help us shine!" ? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened. Not enough votes to reach consensus. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes second time around. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

To be or not to be - that is the question.

Apologies if this has been used before or is frequently used. G1ggy! 04:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Been done. Confusing Manifestation 04:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per ConMan, and phrase definitely on FUI's list.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 06:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, this is about to set a record on previous nominations. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 08:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Do write what is right but... know how to write right.

Self-explanatory.--KnowledgeHegemony 07:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Support Clever! I like it! Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support —ScouterSig 16:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Nice play on words. --Tewy 20:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I also like the wording... ♠Tom@sBat 21:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, although the "do" at the start feels a little extraneous. Confusing Manifestation 22:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support,'nuff said.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 06:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→ Ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, Jim!

A quote from the song. Confusing Manifestation 05:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose as kind of a 'cult reference.' (But I get it!). —ScouterSig 16:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Star Trek is not a cult. :-P I'm actually opposing this for a different reason, that being you can change policies and so forth if consensus about them changes. And Jimbo, as part of the Wikimedia Office, does have the authority to override consensus if need be. See WP:CON. I do like the motto (see my user page) but I just don't think it fits. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 20:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Sorry for another oppose, but one of the main ideas of Wikipedia is that policies may be changed. --Tewy 20:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus, but see edit 1 before archiving. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Who?

Inspired by #You have been rejected, below. --Tewy 18:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very nice. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 19:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, interesting… —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Short and Sweet. --Random ^{Say it here!} 03:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per Random c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Good. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Short, yet creative. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Who are we talking about? ;-) Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 14:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

No pretzel for you

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support Simple and nice, but just fine... ♠Tom@sBat 22:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. This one keeps grabbing my attention for some reason. --Tewy 18:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support How about Donut aswell, maybe Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 20:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support: I like the motto but I don't get how the first link relates to the second. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I think it's trying to say "If you vandalize, we'll take away your editing rights (the pretzel)." Perhaps change it to "Soup", after the famous Seinfeld quote? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

→No soup for you!

Edit 1: Per comment above. More people are going to recognize this. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support the "Soup" version —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scoutersig (talk • contribs).

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Here we observe the Wikipedian in its natural habitat, doing what it does best.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Very nice! Also is humurous... ♠Tom@sBat 22:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: I've also taken the liberty of adding a period. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 22:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, creative. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 23:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Clever --St.daniel ^Talk 12:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Per above. --Tewy 18:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Pretty darn good. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very Attenborough. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 11:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie ^{Spread the love!} 21:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per above:)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 06:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Might as well just pile on the supports. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 02:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Water, water everywhere and barely a drop to drink

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Very good!!! Lets edit before we become thirsty... ♠Tom@sBat 22:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support :) c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 12:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Good encouragement to improve articles. --Tewy 18:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ONLY if we correctly quote the poem. "Water, water everywhere/ Nor any drop to drink. See here. —ScouterSig 16:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved (per consensus), with edit. Scoutersig has a valid argument. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

C://fatal error...not!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Nice idea! Some believe that Wikipedia is failing, but it isn´t! ♠Tom@sBat 22:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 18:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Marbelous, absolutely marbelous. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie ^{Spread the love!} 21:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

What goes around, cums around

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: As amusing as BJAODN can be, I don't really get this. How does it reflect our community? A lot of the stuff on there is added by vandals. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Um... no. And the sexual inuendo is also just weird.—ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Don't get too excited about editing Wikipedia ok? Harrison-HB4026 03:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Eye For an eye leaves everyone blind

New one from Martin Leuther King. I think It's better than my last one. --St.daniel ^Talk 14:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

It's our problem-free
philosophy…
Hakuna Matata!

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, nice one. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I also like it... ♠Tom@sBat 22:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: It's just that good. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 01:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Clever. --Tewy 18:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Nice. Confusing Manifestation 02:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Confession, I love that song. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie ^{Spread the love!} 21:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Ice Age 2 : The Meltdown

Edit one: Another movie related motto from your friend ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 16:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Very creative. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U)
• Support Nice... ♠Tom@sBat 21:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 02:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support: hmmm, didn't notice it before... —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

In an encyclopaedia near you

Variation on ending of movie ads. Simply south 22:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Coming soon to a theatre near you!

Edit one: A variation of Simply south's idea. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 00:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support. It's quite creative, but is a single user's page out of about 5 million really good for a motto, or should the guidelines mention if this is acceptable, etc? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Astro, the page is the only one having something to do with a wikipedia movie, and that is my rationale for the link. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 15:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Humorous.......c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 12:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Nice awareness motto. --Tewy 18:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 07:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia

A combination of "Wiki" and "Encyclopedia" Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, hmmm..., the motto master, huh? Nice. :) *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Short and sweet. --Tewy 18:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: No one's done this before?! ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 19:42, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, oh, the blissful simplicity! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Not half bad. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose 1+1=2. Remember? So someone done it before. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment but this one is Wikipedia not something plus something equals something. What do other people think? Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 09:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Garcia, the text may be different, but they are essentially the same motto. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 13:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, I agree with Kfc. Plus, "Wikipedia" doesn't seem like the best motto for "Wikipedia"... It'd be kind of like having a national anthem chant the name of the country over and over again. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I bet that everyone would remember all the words. :) WODUP 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per 1+1 motto —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scoutersig (talk • contribs).
• Support. ILIKEIT. WODUP 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected,COnsensus favors it, but similar motto done less than 2 months ago.c'mon, we've fished a good one. Me Page Talk to me 14:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

The popups that aren't ads

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Been done before. --Tewy 18:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, more discussion needed. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose per Tewy... thought that would have settled it...? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 06:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Our flaming fists of fury will destroy you, fiends! Ha ha ha… oh man, who writes this stuff!?

Too corny? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong support: (:|x)(S|D|)|P) (meaning :S, :D, :), :P, xS, xD, x), xP in RegExp :-) ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 00:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Nice touch at the end. --Tewy 06:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per Tewy. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 07:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, it took me a sec, but it's a nice one. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: The end is what makes it good. --Random ^{Say it here!} 04:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie ^{Spread the love!} 21:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Heh heh heh. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice and funny! ♠Tom@sBat 21:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support You do. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 07:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Heh heh heh haha hooo hooo heeeeeeeeeheeeee
• Strong Support Hehehe Harrison-HB4026 03:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

We're gonna get ya, vandal, and you're never coming back!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose: It makes wikipedia sound negative. Remember, there are such things as reformed vandals. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Exactly per The Random Editor. --Tewy 18:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't cut wikipedia with a pair of censors

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: xD ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 21:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Strikes me as interesting for some reason. I edited the link to go straight to the censor heading. --Tewy 18:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like puns. —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved, per consensus. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

This is my first motto. If it is to similar to the past mottos, please remove it.---PrestonH 04:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: At least it's not one of those stub → GA → FA or vice versa mottoes. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 13:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. What I don't like it how it makes it sound like all Wikipedians will inevitably become vandals. --Tewy 19:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 2 What about this one (see the links)?

• Support edit 2 Much better; makes sense... ♠Tom@sBat 21:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, I like the idea, but it seems as if it raising up vandals. Why not What comes up, must come down.
  --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support this version. The links in this one are better, but I'm still not too sure about them. Perhaps have the second link go to WP:CVU instead? Good first attempt! Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support . Per Random.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 22:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 3 What about this one?--PrestonH^{(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!)} 14:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up must come down.

Edit 4: Why not? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 16:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, why not create four edits of one motto? Answer: because when the people that close mottoes come to a decision, it's impossible to decide because users support one version, and when new versions are made, nobody pays attention to them. Sorry if I sounded mad, I'm not. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down

Edit 5. Why relate to vandalism, or would this work better if reversed? Simply south 22:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Even though Cremepuff222 is probably going to be seriously irked at you :-) ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 15:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support, I don't get the links. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 6. The Random Editor's idea. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. I actually do like this one. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

What goes up, must come down.

Edit 7. Changed "comes" to "goes". Just for kicks. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

What comes up, must come down.

Edit 8. Why not? --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. --Tewy 18:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

→Remember the Titans

In the film, it talks about the discrimination/conflicts between black and white players, and the plot reveals us that for working together despite those differences, they succeed in most of the matches. There are many different types of wikipedians, but since they work together despite their differences, Wikipedia succeeds! ♠Tom@sBat 23:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, you know what's really wierd? We (my classmates and I) watched this movie in school today! :o *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Why not "As one, we fail; as many we succeed!"? Though I do like what you've done with it :) ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 15:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. I understand the explanation, but the connection is not clear to me, and probably wouldn't be to someone reading the motto without the explanation. --Tewy 18:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, mostly because I think we should have wikipedia links, not wikimedia. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No support, enough votes (although Scoutersig's reason was so-so). --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There are no bad guys, only good guys who are in disguise.

Or would a better one be "there are no strangers, only friends we haven't met yet"? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 10:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. This is a very good way to point out what WP:AGF means. --Tewy 18:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support this version, because I like this one better. :) *Cremepuff222* 22:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Per above; very rhythmic. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: A tad more discussion would be favorable. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, I like this version better. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Supoort first version. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There are no strangers, only friends we haven't met yet

Edit 1. Yuanchosaan's idea. --Tewy 18:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Perhaps it should link to WP:BITE, however. --Tewy 18:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Question: Tewy, why do you have arguments with yourself over mottoes so frequently (not to be rude or anything)? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
    • I often notice that a motto can be improved a bit, but the improvement isn't enough to warrant its own edit. --Tewy 01:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose I guess I just like my first idea better... Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 09:06, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Just a tad more discussion would be favorable. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nominations. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's not about you, it's about us.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Support: I like the motto, but I don't really get the 2^nd link. ~ Magnus animuM  ^{BRAIN FREEZE!} 18:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: the second link refers to "us", or the community. If you can find a better link for "us", please use it. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 19:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 20:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a little more discussion would do some good. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. A good motto to describe WP:OWN. --Tewy 18:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Dig it. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Well there is, isn't there? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Not sure I get the second link. Perhaps the obvious vandalism/reversion links would be more appropriate? --Tewy 00:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Answer:' It's saying that there are so many policies that every time you're making an edit, you're probably breaking one. Plus I wanted to step away from the RC patrol mottoes. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 01:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support There is... Nice motto; and it even is a rhymy, so it really deserves a big smiley ! So, have my positive reaction, for your very good action... ♠Tom@sBat 00:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, tis cool as grapes. Pardon the expression. --Random ^{Say it here!} 13:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, I don't see how a policy/guideline is the opposite of an edit. Even if this is proven true, I strongly believe in blatantly obvious mottoes... *Cremepuff222* 22:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but you might want to provide some sort of link to Newton's Laws of Motion. bibliomaniac15 01:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Why didn't I think of that?!?! ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few actual !votes/no obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: How about "→ For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction"? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 09:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. I just don't see this working. --Tewy 18:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support and you stole my idea for either version. very creative. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Still no consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Edit one: Yuanchosaan's idea. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠIмυМ ≈ √∞ 15:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No discussion after reopening. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Are Wikilinks cool or what?

Oh, the irony. The links are a mix of ones relevant to the concept, and ones that roughly match the word they're linked from. Confusing Manifestation 23:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, don't mean to be rude, but the links don't seem to go well together. Remember, a good motto doesn't neccessarily need a million links. ;) *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Meh, too much of a stretch. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There's no "or" on Wikipedia.

I was participatin in some AfDs, and one was made with WP:OR. So, this motto was born! *Cremepuff222* 21:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support: Just not mottoey enought. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support Per Magnus animum. ♠Tom@sBat 21:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support Just doesn't have the "motto feel". --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, alright then, give it a "motto feel". :-) *Cremepuff222* 22:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Not since that note on Random's talk page :) ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Please leave your or at the front door.

I know it is really lame, but it certainly will get people to click the link. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, I'm literally laughing! Thanks for that one, Random. *Cremepuff222* 22:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: But what about "There's no I in Team"? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 02:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Please leave your O.R. at the front door.

Edit two, sounded a bit better. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support not bad. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support this version, I like how the link is done in this one better. I also like Magnus's suggestion above. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 18:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Very interesting. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I like this edit best. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no 'or' in 'Wikipedia'.

Edit 3. Sorry for the extra edit, but this goes along with the "I" in "team" phrase. --Tewy 18:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 2. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

→ I'm going to make you an offer; it's an offer you can't refuse

From The Godfather. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, it's been used (careful, this page is very big and may crash your browser). Sorry! *Cremepuff222* 21:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Well, I can't say I didn't expect that. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We have all got something to sing about

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support, it's just okay... Also, didn't we conclude to not use the WP:EDIANS link if it wasn't neccessary? *Cremepuff222* 21:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, Per Cremepuff222. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Neural: Per Cremepuff222. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 02:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: What's wrong with the WP:EDIANS link? Could you link me to the disscussion about not using that link? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day#Banning of redundant links. --Tewy 05:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Seems fine to me... Even with the link... ♠Tom@sBat 21:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but nix the WP:EDIANS link. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Note, per consensus, I removed the WP:EDIANS link. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 19:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Head On, apply directly to the forehead.

Redian asked for it - plus, I wanted to see if I could work with the most annoying commercial ever. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Nice! ♠Tom@sBat 20:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support It works, good choice of links, and I'm not just supporting because I wanted a motto related. Redian (Talk) 23:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, it almost wins the most annoying commercial award. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, a tad more discussion would do some good. *Cremepuff222* 01:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. Quite similar to my other motto, should that one be in edit or vice versa? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Since yours was made after this one, I suggest making it an edit one version of this. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 13:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment, that motto was rejected. Nobody seemed to like it, sorry. *Cremepuff222* 21:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment: Figures as I never look through the archives. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• (Killing the indent here) Support, seems fine to me. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Per above. --Tewy 19:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Welsh
Icelandic
Korean
Italian
Polish
Esperanto
Dutch
Ido
Arabic

I apologize for this leviathan of coding; the interwiki-links wouldn't display at all. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 20:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. I cleaned up the coding a bit using wikilinks (you probably needed a colon after the first set of brackets). --Tewy 21:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I wonder why it wouldn't work without the previous colons. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Without the previous colons, it simply provides a link to the other language's equivelent page on the left of this page. --Tewy 04:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support Very creative... Well done! ♠Tom@sBat 22:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Creative. bibliomaniac15 02:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 02:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, sorry, it's very creative, but I just can't imagine seeing such a mess at the top of my userpage. It's not like this vote's going to matter... :) *Cremepuff222* 21:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, Like Cremepuff222 this is going to create a userpage mess. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: aah, commone, it's only one day :), plus it's kinda creative! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Thank you t-borg for being the voice of reason :) ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - I do agree in that it's going to make a bit of a display mess, but I think it's really cool and very original, and I do also agree with T-borg. Plus, it made me chuckle. :-) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose I can't imaGINE this huge mess on the top of me userpage, neither, but it is pretty creative...c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 22:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment And when you edit your page as well. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 13:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. When you edit your userpage, it won't really matter, because it's just the motd template, not subst, so when you edit, it shouldn't take up any more space in edit box, because it's a template, and the template changes, not your userpage's edit box. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment Oh, forgot, but still, won't work....... whenit's on you're page it's going to be a few years later.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 22:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• You don't know what your page's gonna be like in a few years, you may even have removed the template by then! :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 16:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Wot?! Remove the template? Oh my God! I'll never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!My name is Maximus Caesar Zabidus 22:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose as too much space to too-little result. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: Perhaps there should be a subpage "Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Most controversial nominations"? :) ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 17:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: no way, far too trivial. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 17:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment. Ok, so maybe the suggestion for the suggested page should be put in the suggested page itself, as the idea for the page would be one of the most controversial nominations :) . -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Oppose new subpage. Per T-borg. --Tewy 01:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Shame about the length. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

No guts, no glory.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 15:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very good. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 15:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - *claps* I couldn't have said it better myself. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 16:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. --Tewy 21:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, simple and well-linked. *Cremepuff222* 22:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Da-na-nana- Da na na na Da na na na naa~ c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, For once a short one. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but has this been done before? —ScouterSig 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus (hasn't been done before). --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

They always said a picture was worth a thousand words.

I thought I'd try a hand and writing a motto of my own, playing on the "every picture's worth a thousand words" quote. Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ^☎/ _∑ 01:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, thanks for trying, but it's already been used. Sorry! *Cremepuff222* 01:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, Darn it! Oh well, I dont believe i've read the volumes of past Mottos. But I'll keep trying. Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ^☎/ _∑ 02:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Up, up, and away!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Nice! It kind of made me laugh... ♠Tom@sBat 00:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: What can I say? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, I'm getting tired of these progressional stub to featured article mottoes. *Cremepuff222* 00:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, always room for more :). —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 10:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support - It's alright, but I've seen better. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 16:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, It's the kind of motto you first look at and think, bland. Once you look again, it seems kinda good. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Agree with Cremepuff about the progression, and it really isn't that exciting. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Just what we need. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When the going gets tough, the tough get going

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Explains that every bad thing that rises, falls; but in a nice way! ♠Tom@sBat 00:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support: the links and words don't fit all that well… ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, too similar to this motto in my opinion. *Cremepuff222* 00:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - per Magnus and Cremepuff. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Somewhat been done before, no consensus in support. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

To get the goal, first you need a ball.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support One step at a time... ♠Tom@sBat 00:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: AstroHurricane, your mottoes are really popular. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, nice wording. *Cremepuff222* 01:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, pretty good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 10:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Very encouraging. Deserves a Strong Support. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't dispose of your stubs, make them bigger.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Small articles should be improved and instead of directly deleted; that´s what this motto tells us... ♠Tom@sBat 00:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Though the 2nd link could be improved. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, we have a lot of similar nominations. *Cremepuff222* 01:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support! —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 10:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - It's similar to the above, but in a good way. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Good concept, but oddly worded. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It takes a thief for you to lock the door

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support How true... ♠Tom@sBat 00:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Very well said! Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Consider this my vote as well; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's the calm after the storm

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support ♠Tom@sBat 00:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, cool. *Cremepuff222* 22:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: 'Nuff said :) ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 01:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Inspiring. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Suddenly, out of the darkness, a ghost appeared

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Quite true; vandalism is frequent and may occur at any of the 6,847,335 articles. ♠Tom@sBat 00:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Yep Yep c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Again, consider this my support; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Three strikes, you're out!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support ♠Tom@sBat 00:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support and You stole my idea - I was going to nominate the same thing. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, nice, but how about (see below)? *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Three strikes, and you're out!

Edit 1, even though I disklike edits greatly, I thought these links would be better. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, as nominator. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 21:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Been done before. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Invincible? Oh, really?

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Another fine example of how weak vandalism is... ♠Tom@sBat 00:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 10:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, with my support; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Rated PG-13 for language, violence, and sexual content.

Do I really need to explain this one? *Cremepuff222* 23:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: As Wikipedia is not #$@&* censored! ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Right! Wikipedia is not censored. Who ever heard of a censored encyclopedia? Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support kinda same †Bloodpack† 21:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Hoo-rah. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 07:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I am the ice cream man, I drive over fat kids with my van

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Rather humorous. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, I know where I'll be when Magnus drives an ice cream truck...hopefully on a plane or maybe the moon. ;) *Cremepuff222* 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment, Are you faT, Cremepuff? :):):) c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, rather violent, but well-linked. *Cremepuff222* 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Well linke, but may be offensive to some users. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Per Ryan. ♠Tom@sBat 22:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. This motto has a source, I didn't just make it up. However, I can't seem to find it on wp (I didn't look). It is a commonly used song/poem/slur used by some people when they talk about ice cream. I don't know where it came from though. Should wikipedia mention this, or is it not notable enough, or is it already on wiki? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 22:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, unlike Wikipedia articles, mottoes don't have to be notable. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - Sorry, a lot of people aren't going to like this at all, per Ryan. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 14:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support x1000000000 Humorous and well linked. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 22:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Hi. Um, is it really appropriate to have a billion strong supports? I mean, if it were typed out that many times, it would take about 15 Gigabytes. So, does this make much difference from a strong support? I heard you're only supposed to vote once, so isn't this cheating? I mean, what if someone put "Extreme infinite support x 1x10^∞"? Wouldn't that be cheating, if say, there were many opposes, then if it were infinite, that one vote would cause all other votes to be obsolete? So, would it be more appropriate if you put "very strong support"? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 17:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Actually,.... It's not really a serious vote. Same as a Strong Support or Support 22:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Offensive. --Tewy 20:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Besides, Don't insult the vandals. --Tewy 16:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I am the ice cream man, but I don't give ice-cream to kids that are bad

Variation c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 15:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When Random Article hands you bad articles, make an FA

invented from the popular saying: "When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Felix 18:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support This is just fine. ♠Tom@sBat 20:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support This or edit with Special:Random link. Confusing Manifestation 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When Random Article hands you bad articles, make an FA

Edit 1, Revised to include another link from the above version. Felixboy 12:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

When life gives you lemons, make lemonade

Edit 2, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support edit 2: This version is the best. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, a disgruntled Cremepuff222 writhes on the ground as he listens to the awful sound of cliché... :-) *Cremepuff222* 00:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support and a sedative for Cremepuff. About time someone used this. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 15:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Very funny, Hersfold, but I thinkhe needs a Banana and a sedative and a book to read, preferably an Ossi joke book.:)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 15:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very nice nomination --St.daniel ^Talk 18:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support this edit —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody... Help! But not just anybody... Help!

From the popular song of The Beatles: Help!. ♠Tom@sBat 20:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support I like the links, but aren't the song mottoes getting kind of old?. --Random ^{Say it here!} 21:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, I'm a fan of the Beatles, but I think that the notto could have better links. Also, I do agree that the song mottoes are kinda overused... *Cremepuff222* 23:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Ok. Then... What links do you suggest, Cremepuff222? ♠Tom@sBat 23:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: I suggest something like:

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Help! I've fallen and I can't get up!

An alternative to the above; it's inspired by the LifeAlert commercial "I've fallen and I can't get up." ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 23:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, OH MY GOSH!!! That is the most annoying commercial ever!! :-) *Cremepuff222* 00:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I don't know if Cremepuff222 is being serious or not, but I think the commercial is annoying too. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: You're both wrong; the most annoying commercial is "Head On, apply directly to the forehead; Head On, apply directly to the forehead; Head On, apply directly to the forehead." AARGH Nooooo, now it's stuck in my head! ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Well if we're aiming at annoying commercials, head on definitely wins. Perhaps we can turn that into a motto too? Redian (Talk) 00:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose I like the idea it just doesn't seem motto-ey enough for me. (Although I'm not really one to talk) Redian (Talk) 00:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. So in terms of the motto (not the underlying backstory…), I think it grabs my attention in a humorous way. --Tewy 00:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 21:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose per Redian. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody...Help! But not just anybody...Help!

edit 2, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Looks quite good actually. Support. Simply south 20:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I need somebody...Help! But not just anybody...Help!

Or another alternative which is a slight variation on the above (links for the first half are different). Edit three. Simply south 16:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. Too few votes after second nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Push it, push it, to the limit, limit

From Corbin Bleu's song Push it to the limit. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, honestly, these Disney songs are starting to get pretty redundant. *Cremepuff222* 00:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Cool! Disney songs make good matches! ♠Tom@sBat 00:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support with my pants on: (from a joke in Bibliomaniac15's RfA) In my archive craze, I only approved one Disney motto, so I suppose another wouldn't hurt. Also considering I've made some literary mottoes which were approved. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 02:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, apparently, I wasn't in a good mood yesterday, because today I think it's pretty cool! :) *Cremepuff222* 17:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I think it might be good if Wikipedia:Peer review linked to one of the push its. Just a suggestion. Simply south 20:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, that sounds like a good idea! *Cremepuff222* 20:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC) (Changed my mind...) *Cremepuff222* 00:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment, Cremepuff, err, I don't think it's Yesterday, it's the same day! Kfc1864 08:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support on the toilet Forgot to support. Kfc1864 05:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for one version. *Cremepuff222* 23:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Push it, push it, to the limit, limit

(Edit 1) great idea simply south. --Random ^{Say it here!} 21:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support this version - Simply a good idea, South. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 21:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support this version more than the other one Per above. ♠Tom@sBat 20:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Hmmmmm... Simply south 00:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, Magnus animum and Cremepuff222, what is your take on the motto. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Honestly, I don't think that editter reivews help get an article to featured article status. So, I support the previous motto. *Cremepuff222* 00:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Err, its not editor review, its peer review, which reviews the article for improvements and not the editor. Simply south 17:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for one version. *Cremepuff222* 23:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Voters emphasized "this version" in votes, only one support vote for original nomination after this edit was introduced. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Elementary, my dear Watson

Simply south 20:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: I'll be candid: I just don't get the 2^nd 1st link. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, the links and words don't seem to go well together. *Cremepuff222* 22:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. No support. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Elementary, my dear Watson

Without the Mypage link. See here on Wikitionary why i chose that link. Edit one. Simply south 09:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Kill 'em with love!

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 17:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, Good one! Short and snappy! Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: But wouldn't AGF be a better 2nd link? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: ok, how's this:

Rejected. See edit 1. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Kill 'em with love!

Edit one. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Like this more! c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 08:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: This version makes more sense. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose both. I'm not sure I want to kill anybody, even vandals. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus, which seems to favor this version. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We build our towers up, not down.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, pretty good. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 17:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, though deleting articles does benefit the encyclopedia. *Cremepuff222* 19:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Very good. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: How true. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. If you don't like the "down" link, may I suggest replacing it with WP:VAND? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support edit one. Very nice. —ScouterSig 16:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

We build our best towers up, not down to the ground

edit 1, suggestion. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected. See original nomination. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's priceless, but you get it for FREE! (plus shipping and handling).

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support I like it, nice choice of words! Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 18:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, it made me laugh! The links are good too. *Cremepuff222* 19:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Per Cremepuff222. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. bibliomaniac15 01:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice and humurouse! ♠Tom@sBat 00:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I hope it's insured

The article can be reverted if needed. Page history = insurance. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 10:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it's pretty funny. *Cremepuff222* 19:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very nice! ♠Tom@sBat 00:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Once again, call this my support vote; per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

All creatures, great and small

From the hymn. Or the RSPCA's motto. Or the novel series, film, and TV show. ^_^. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 09:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Well done! c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 10:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • I take it that is a support? ^_^ Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 08:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Yes! Support! c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: What can I say? ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 22:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Very nice indeed! ♠Tom@sBat 22:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved. Per consensus. --Tewy 00:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sapere aude

Sapere aude Latin for Dare to know or Dare to be wise. May not be funny, but it exemplifies what Wikipedia is

Booksworm -- Talk to me! 15:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Try to change the link to Special:Random. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 19:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, only one person (besides nominator) supports. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

→ Sapere aude

Edit 1. Added arrow and linked to Wikipedia. Special:Random, as Magnus animum said, would work as well, though. --Tewy 19:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I like the changes made above! Booksworm Talk to me! 20:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• I forgot to add my Support to the above Motto as is a self-nom Booksworm Talk to me! 20:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 20:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I think that the arrow won't do any good, for mottos are good when you instantly understand it, while with this motto you need to click on the link to find out what "Sapere aude" is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PostScript (talk • contribs).
    • Would you say that once you know what sapere aude means, it's a good motto? --Tewy 18:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Per above. c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 06:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment -- Why are mottoes like "Eat Your Vegetables!" and You're expelled from the Garden of Eden! any clearer/better? Booksworm Talk to me! 07:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Especially as you did nominate the one on the Garden of Eden.... Booksworm Talk to me! 15:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Because,like Tewy said, some people may not understand it (I did, too)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 16:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
        • I agree, but I would like to point out that "Eat Your Vegetables" isn't any clearer.... Booksworm Talk to me! 16:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
          • I didn't support it, did I?c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, only one person (besides nominator) supports. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Eat your vegetables!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very good links and phrasing. ~ Magnus animuM  ^{BRAIN FREEZE!} 18:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, eye catching. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 18:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Simple yet catchy. ♠Tom@sBat 20:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, but I think all of the WP:EDIT etc. links are getting a bit overused. I'm wondering if I'll ever see the day when a motto can be made without using any links... (though I suppose this one needs some links for it to make sense) *Cremepuff222* 21:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Schedule/Archive/2006. --Tewy 18:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus says "YES!" *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Back to the drawing board!

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: What can I say? ~ Magnus animuM  ^{BRAIN FREEZE!} 22:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 20:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I like to build beautiful castles in the sandbox. ;-) *Cremepuff222* 21:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely enough supports to judge on this one. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Always, for secure protection against leakage

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very nice links. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 01:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, yes, they are. *Cremepuff222* 21:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus in favor. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The golden age is here right now

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support: Doesn't strike me as overly amazing. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support. Good, but overlinked. bibliomaniac15 02:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Links don't really make sense. Mottos should be quickly interpreted. --Tewy 05:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, at this rate, the motto won't recieve much support in the future. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

A tornado warning has been issued for the town of Article

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 00:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose: Kinda confusing and also, how can a page be vandalized if it's protected? ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per above; overlinked. --Tewy 05:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Per Tewy and Magnus c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!me workings 01:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus says "NO!" *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 23:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

→ Think of me
Think of me fondly
When we say "Good Bye".

From The Phantom, a musical of which I am a huge fan (I must be a dramaturge as I've made 3 nominations based on plays or books :-) ). ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, it's just that good! :-) *Cremepuff222* 23:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 01:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I like the links. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 09:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Per Yuanchosaan. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus and WP:SNOW. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Home is where the heart is.

Seems like I have seen it before. --Random ^{Say it here!} 01:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support and and are present in this motto... Well done! ♠Tom@sBat 20:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, ha, ha, funny mottoes are good! :) *Cremepuff222* 20:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: How true. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 00:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Good enough :|c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 03:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Where the sun shines and the living laugh, there is always going to be happiness.

Aaaaahhhhh........c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 06:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Creates a nice mood, although a bit on the long side. --Tewy 18:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, Per Tewy --Random ^{Say it here!} 01:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Per Tewy. ~ Magnus animuM ^{Brain Freeze!} 23:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Well done! ♠Tom@sBat 20:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I do agree with the size issue, but I think the coolness of the motto counters the problem. *Cremepuff222* 21:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus.. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 23:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't handle the truth! Or can you?

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: What about Special:Statistics? ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: then what would the second link be? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: That's what the second link should be - Special:Statistics. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I do like the second link as it is, a cliffhanger. WODUP 06:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, nice surprise ending!

Approved, consensus seems to approve of this version... *Cremepuff222* 00:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You can't handle the truth! Or can you?

Edit one per Magnus animum's suggestion. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 07:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, consensus seems to not think much of this version... *Cremepuff222* 00:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The stuff that dreams are made of.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Really, you need to get out more (just kidding; like I should talk :-) ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, I like mottoes that make me laugh. *Cremepuff222* 23:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, for the motto-ey ness and the fact that it all fits. Redian (Talk) 01:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per having already 3 support votes. ♠Tom@sBat 01:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, nice flow of words. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Not that it matters. --Tewy 22:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Slightly short though.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre!me workings 06:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, many supports, and no opposes, and no comments, and no weak supports, and... *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

What we've got here is FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE!

Really now, if it gets this hot you'd think people were more interested in flaming, instead of writing an encyclopedia, don't you agree? (the capps are for grabbing the eye, also for making a point) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very nice. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 22:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, raises awareness of WP:ArbReq. *Cremepuff222* 23:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Per Cremepuff222. --Random ^{Say it here!} 02:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support without any opposition... Booksworm Talk to me! 21:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Wow......c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 01:13, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
• SupportThis is a great motto. --ASDFGHJKL=Greatest Person Ever+Coolest Person Ever 13:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, obvious support! *Cremepuff222* 00:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

~'Tis as sweet as grapes.

Anything to say? :) —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 23:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, 'tis true! (Why didn't I think of that? :) ). *Cremepuff222* 23:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, You beat me to it Cremepuff222. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Perhaps you should add "→" to the nomination :-) ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support ♠Tom@sBat 01:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support and a nomination for Cremepuff's Cool Grapes Barnstar. :-) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. bibliomaniac15 02:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Just adding my name... --Tewy 05:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support I likey the juice! Felix 15:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - I quote Edna Mode Beautiful Darling! Booksworm Talk to me! 20:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Someone should close this, has any motto gotten so many "Supports"? It's a WikiRecord! --PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 14:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• I think so! I think I heard this a lot from you, Creamepuff...oh! Almost forgot! BOOM BOOM AAAAAAARGH SupportKfc1864 15:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, wow, I feel special! ;) *Cremepuff222* 17:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved: Per consensus (barely :-) ) . ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 01:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Mmm, it's now an userbox:
  This user thinks Wikipedia is sweet - just like grapes!
  . Sad I missed out on voting. Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 10:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, (again). Eh-hem, time to issue my speech of recognition. First of all, I thank T-borg for nominating this fine example of a motto. Plus, I thank Magnus for suggesting the link to my userpage–has this even been before? And I thank all the rest of you (even Yuanchosaan) for supporting this motto. :) Thanks to all! *Cremepuff222* 00:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I want to be alone.

—May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. No flash. --Tewy 22:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose: Per Tewy; look @ the discussion on the main talk page. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: delinked, per Magnus animum, not that it'll matter, eh ;). —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per consensus. *Cremepuff222* 01:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

He'll be back.

From the Terminator. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: May I also say that WP:SOCK would be a good link as well. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: the sock-puppeteer? I don't think the link will be enough elaboration in that case. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, just like the burrito I just ate. *Cremepuff222* 23:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Hardiharhar (Sarcastic Laugh) Booksworm Talk to me! 20:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus mostly in favor. *Cremepuff222* 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Head on, apply directly to the forehead

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, was this meant to be in edit? There's one a bit similar to this one a ways down... :p *Cremepuff222* 21:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Hi. Well, it was inspired by that one, but I don't think it is similar enough to be an edit, mainly because "commercials" are a broad topic. Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Question: How do these links apply to the words at hand? bibliomaniac15 01:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Answer: They're ment to say something along the lines of: "ACID, apply directly (by editting) to the article". Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 12:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Aaargh, not head on, your forehead will be smashed n'all. if you made it, try tounge on.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 06:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, nobody seems to like it... *Cremepuff222* 01:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Do your business in the bathroom, not here.

-- AstroHurricane001^(T+C+U) 21:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, lol! That's funny... *Cremepuff222* 22:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Per Cremepuff222. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Support, but still Support Don´t really like with what you compare it with, even if it is vandalism what´s being compared; but, due to the 3 previose supports and that it says "business" instead of something else, I´ll support it. ♠Tom@sBat 01:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, hahahahaha, hehehehehehe. Okay that is a bit much. I like it. --Random ^{Say it here!} 02:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, Muahahaha! c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 00:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Umm... well, that's *clears throat* interesting. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, lot's 'o support, and barely any opposition. *Cremepuff222* 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Club Penguin, where you can adopt a puffle

Check the links! ♠Tom@sBat 20:24, 8 May 2 007 (UTC)

• Support, but what's a "puffle"? Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

A puffle is a fluffy little creature available in the popular mmorpg Club Penguin; in this game, you play as a penguin and you can adopt these little thingies just like you do with pets; somewhat similiar to how an advanced editor adopts a new user here on Wikipedia. For more information, see here. ♠Tom@sBat 01:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: I thought the Club Penguin link would lead to The Penguin Cabal. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - These go right together. Although I have never used Club Penguin, my real life buddy tells me about it very time I see him, so I probably know by now what it is. Ryan ^{Got something to say?} 17:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though I have noclue what a puffle is. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

May the Edit be with you, always.

From T-borgs phrase, the one he has got on his signature. ♠Tom@sBat 20:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, already been done, phraise is deffinitely on the FUIs list, sorry. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 20:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Oh! Never knew it had been already used! Well, I´ll have to oppose my own nomination... ♠Tom@sBat 21:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, I'll just leave it at that. ;) *Cremepuff222* 01:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1+1=2

Make sure to check the links to see what I mean! ♠Tom@sBat 16:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, kinda clever. And surprisingly hasn't been done yet. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Per Hersfold. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - "We are amused" Booksworm Talk to me! 15:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. I'm surprised that it hasn't been done, too. WODUP 06:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Very nice. --Tewy 16:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support - Very Clever (better than other Mottoes...) Booksworm Talk to me! 19:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but... Haven´t you voted twice? ♠Tom@sBat 22:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though Booksworm voted twice... *Cremepuff222* 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

You're expelled from the Garden of Eden!

Got the idea when I was on the toilet.Kfc1864 05:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, may be religiously offencive. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 17:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose I agree with T-borg, some people might find it offensive. --Random ^{Say it here!} 18:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Per above. ♠Tom@sBat 20:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, yeah, that might not go over too well. Kinda saying "first humans = vandals" Hersfold ^(talk/work) 01:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose: Per T-borg. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 01:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose per all of the above. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose That is why I don't think when I am on the toilet! Felix 15:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Sorry, but may be religiously offensive.... Booksworm Talk to me! 07:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, for a record number of opposes (I think...). ;) *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever your doing, and go edit.

--Random ^{Say it here!} 16:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: Kinda boring. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 18:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose, it should be "you're" not "your," and it is kinda boring. Try to make it as cool as grapes in the freezer! *Cremepuff222* 20:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose in favour of edit three. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 12:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing, and go edit.

Edit 1: Grammar. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Magnus animum (talk • contribs).

• Still oppose: Per reason on the original nomination. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 21:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral - Might be better with some clever links. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 23:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose in favour of edit three. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 12:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing, and go edit.

Edit 2: Creative Links

• Support: Very good, however, see below.

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose in favour of edit three. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 12:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing and go edit

Edit three: Different creative links. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support I like what you did with it. --Random ^{Say it here!} 01:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 12:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Drop whatever you're doing and go edit

Edit four: Alternative to above, but with more suggestive links. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support very naughty =D †Bloodpack† 21:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose in favour of edit three. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 12:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, this was a tough one, but there has been absolutely no discussion since it was last closed. *Cremepuff222* 00:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Make love not war.

I forgot where I got this... Tohru Honda13 19:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: umm, not from here, I hope? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 19:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, oh no! It's been used!! That was a really good idea though... *Cremepuff222* 19:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose. Per above. --Tewy 23:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Umm, haven't we concluded that it's been used? *Cremepuff222* 17:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, already used. *Cremepuff222* 23:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

"The world will be happier if you just admit your insanity to imperfection Mr. Editor..."

Source Unavailable... Telling the world that those who are truly insane are usually happy... 17:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insanityofjoy (talk • contribs)

• Neutral: I'm not sure I get it :P ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 22:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose - Don't get it, and the lack of links doesn't help much with the understanding. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support, one could hickory smoke it or add some secret herbs and hot sauce to make it a bit spicier and interesting (translation: add some links already!!). :-) *Cremepuff222* 01:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism? What's that?

Dunno if it was done before. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 21:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support: May I also comment that WP:AGF would be a good link as well. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism? What's that?

Edit one, sorry, guess when you're blind as a bat, you can't see what links you're typing. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 21:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support I prefer this to the WP:DR one. --Islomaniac 973 19:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It is time to go to the mattresses.

It is from the Godfather --Random ^{Say it here!} 23:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: See below (I am an edit maker machine, aren't I?). ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, you're getting a little edit-happy...maybe tone it down a bit. It makes it easier to vote on just one version. --Tewy 01:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: I can't help it...no one seems to notice my original nominations (like the December 25 section that I created), however, I'll try to stop making an alternate version every time I visit this page (maybe every 3 times I visit :-) ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 02:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, edit one approved. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Do it, and you'll be sleepin' with the fishes.

Edit one:An alternative to the above, also from the Godfather. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support: I like both of the Mottos. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support. Good use of links. --Tewy 01:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate a more thorough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though no more discussion has occured, there's nobody that opposes this version. *Cremepuff222* 23:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

There's a reason I'm so apathetic, but I can't be bothered to tell you.

It's a personal saying of mine, and apathy could be construed as a neutral point of view (not caring one way or the other). HalfShadow 02:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Your first (I think) motto is right up there with Mtmelendez (i.e. this is a great motto). ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 22:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

A word to the wise ain't necessary … it's the ignorant ones that need the advice.

Edit one. In case it was the offensive wording... Chrishyman 00:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support Less offensive... Good! ♠Tom@sBat 03:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Best of the best? Not yet, up to you, really.

And out of the blue, this came… —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support: May I also say that I've added a link to WP:WIF. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 23:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: a little ellaboration, please? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 23:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Clarification: The tone of this motto suggests that wikipedia is not being all that it should and WP:WIF encapsulates that notion. ~ Magnus animum  ^∫ φ _γ 01:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: oh, I see. Thanks. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 08:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Best of the best? Not yet, up to you, really.

Edit one, delinked you. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 22:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per no further discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We will remember them

Last line of the fourth stanza of theOde of Remembrance, often recited on ANZAC day. This is my first try so please help. Happy Editing! Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 00:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Considering that this is your first motto, I'll support it, however, next time you may wish to try something to the tune of: "We will remember them." ~ Magnus animum ∵ ^∫ φ _γ 00:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Rejected, still, no more support! *Cremepuff222* 23:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We will go, and we welcome newcomers.

How is this, for instance? Kfc1864 03:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: I'm going to be bland, I just don't get it. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 15:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. Not very catchy. --Tewy 17:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, just doesn't hit me like a good motto should. Note: I've taken the liberty of removing the capital W in welcome newcomers... didn't look like it fit. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 23:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: To generate more discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, discussion hasn't been generated. :) *Cremepuff222* 23:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure?

A bit simple maybe? Yuanchosaan^Salutations! 08:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Oppose: Rather boring (like I should talk ;-) ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 19:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, sorry, I just don't think anyone is going to think this is great. *Cremepuff222* 00:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Nice! ♠Tom@sBat 01:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No obvious consensus. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Over the river and through the woods, to Wikipedia I go!

Edit two. I didn't like the linking, and I went to the original phrasing. So that's support. Chrishyman 00:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 22:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Grapes are key.

I thought that by using an unordinary word like grapes, I could somehow lure a user into clicking on the links. *Cremepuff222* 00:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Tis as cool as grapes! ♠Tom@sBat 01:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, hey! Don't be taking my catch phrase! ;) *Cremepuff222* 01:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Technically...all work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, and may be redistributed. --Tewy 02:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Grrrrrrrrr, you got me there, Tewy. ;) *Cremepuff222* 20:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Per TomasBat. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 11:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 09:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though I nominated it... *Cremepuff222* 23:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The enemy's gate is down.

It is from the book Ender's Game. --Random ^{Say it here!} 02:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, is it just me or are the vandalism mottoes getting redundant? *Cremepuff222* 20:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still no discussion. *Cremepuff222* 23:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The devil can cite scripture for his purpose.

From The Merchant of Venice. --Random ^{Say it here!} 02:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, I like it, but is it sating that it is fine for a user to vandalize if he can prove that he has good reasoning? *Cremepuff222* 20:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment and subsequent Weak Oppose: If it were, said vandal would be violating WP:POINT and WP:REICHSTAG. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 00:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The devil can cite scripture for his purpose.

(Edit 1) Good point. --Random ^{Say it here!} 00:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

They won't see us changing from Such Great Heights.

A slight change to the lyrics from Such Great Heights by The Postal Service. Redian (Talk) 20:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak oppose, I understand the motto, but I don't think the links fit (specifically the last one). *Cremepuff222* 20:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

They won't see us waving from Such Great Heights.

• I'll keep trying, do these links fit better or is the overall meaning just not good? (And apologies if I should have waited a little longer) Redian (Talk) 21:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: No discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Give them just one last chance

♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 22:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Support, kinda boring. *Cremepuff222* 01:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support and comment: Per Cremepuff222; shouldn't the second link be to WP:AGF? ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 01:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: I've made the edit 1 version below.

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still, no discussion has been made! *Cremepuff222* 23:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Give them just one last chance

Edit one: Changed the link from CAT:RFU to WP:AGF. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 15:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support Edit 1 - Link better. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support', this one makes better sense. *Cremepuff222* 17:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, still, no discussion has been made! *Cremepuff222* 23:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

One edit to change the world.

User:Scienza 15:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support, could be good with some better links. See Edit 1 below. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 22:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

One edit to change the world

Per comment above, new links to WP:UuU, WP:EDIT, and Encyclopedia, respectively. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 22:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support Hersfold ^(talk/work) 22:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia: You are always welcome

DarkAvenger 09:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Umm, users who have been here a long time are not welcomed again. Please see below. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 22:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  • "Welcome" doesn't necessarily refer to being welcomed. In this case I think it refers to just an overall sense of community and welcome-ness. --Tewy 23:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose. In any case I have to oppose this because it has sort of been done before. --Tewy 23:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

You're Welcome

Edit one: Clearer phrasing. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 22:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Today you will despair,Tomorrow you will be calm.

Kfc1864 08:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Is that good enough?

Support Obviously!Kfc1864 08:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment-Huh? I don't understand it.

• Comment: How does this relate to Wikipedia? ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 22:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, I think some links should do the trick. *Cremepuff222* 01:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Today you will despair, tomorrow you will be calm.

Edit 1. Links and grammar.

• Support. I know the "Req. for Unblock" page is a little small, but it sort of fits. I hope this is what you were going for Kfc1864. Chrishyman 00:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support per User:Chrishy man. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, per original reason. *Cremepuff222* 23:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

We need you!

most of the mottos are all about wikipedia. its time we invite others to donate their ideas †Bloodpack† 04:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support. There have actually been a lot of past mottos that linked to this project, but I can't find one with this wording. --Tewy 04:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • i guess this one's straight to the point =] †Bloodpack† 05:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Support: How true :-)  ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 02:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Dosent have a good ring to it. Harrison-HB4026 08:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
  • ok, how bout...We need you! Ring! Ring! thats 2 rings =D †Bloodpack† 22:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Ha...ha... Very funny smart alec Harrison-HB4026 11:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Probably really late to comment on this one, but what if it was "Uncle Sam wants you!" Redian (Talk) 21:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
        • Sorry, no, Redian..., see this.

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support ♠Tom@sBat 12:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, even though only one more support has been added. *Cremepuff222* 23:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

This motto may require...

I like the "template motto" look. It didn't work as a header, obviously, so I hope that's how I should do it. (The template is the only part of the motto.) ---Without Wax Chrishyman 00:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose: Weak Support: Please see this motto and this motto. Thanks,  ~ Steptrip 00:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC) In light of the below statements.  ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 21:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Technically, your examples are different from this one. All that is the same, as I see it, is the template format. --Tewy 04:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support not because of the previously given samples above, but rather the message per se. Why would we present a quote that still needs a clean up? †Bloodpack† 04:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. It isn't meant as the motto itself, but the project as a whole. All of MOTD. I said "may require cleanup" because many mottoes ignore FUI. Also, put a link to this nomination page as "replace this motto with a better one", to promote new mottoes. Chrishyman 04:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Edit. Added link from "motto" to WP:MOTD to add some clarity. Didn't deserve an entire rewrite. Chrishyman 18:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support I am an active contributor to this project because a motto I once read invited me to help! This mottos can really atract more editors to help us out and share their ideas! ♠Tom@sBat 00:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus, but may gain support in future. *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support, it's just okay... *Cremepuff222* 17:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely reached. *Cremepuff222* 23:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Let's do it!

Edit 2. Harrison-HB4026's idea, from my talk page, with the (judging by all the above support votes) popular links. This is a little different from the existing motto. --Tewy 06:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough discussion. (Note: when archiving this version, place it under the original motto at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 5 as edit 2.) *Cremepuff222* 22:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support, it's boring. *Cremepuff222* 00:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose-Very boring. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, nobody in favor after even after first closure. *Cremepuff222* 23:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I know who I am, I know where I stand, I would never run away when articles get bad...

From Hannah Montana´s song I got nerve; note that I replaced "life" with "articles". ♠Tom@sBat 02:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: See below. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 15:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 02:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, edit 1 approved. *Cremepuff222* 23:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I know who I am, I know where I stand, I would never run away when articles get bad...

Edit 1: An alternative to the above, with the 2^nd link changed. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 15:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support this version, I like the final link better. *Cremepuff222* 17:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support I like this motto, because I also know who I am, and I know where I stand. Like wise I would never run away when articles get bad. --Random ^{Say it here!} 22:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak support. Interesting, although a bit long. --Tewy 22:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, barely, but consensus reached. *Cremepuff222* 23:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Why move to Orlando when the sea is calm?

– AstroHurricane001^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?)} 16:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, the links fit very well, and the motto is interesting. *Cremepuff222* 17:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support. Interesting. --Tewy 17:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support-Per User:Cremepuff222. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approved, consensus in favor (barely). *Cremepuff222* 23:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

When the going gets hungry, feed it.

– AstroHurricane001^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?)} 16:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support, but is it too similar to this motto on the 18^th? *Cremepuff222* 17:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply: I wouldn't think so, because they are rather different, as only the words "when", "the", and "get(s)", are actually repeated. I can see why you think it's similar, because they are inspired by the same quote, but nevertheless different. Thanks. – AstroHurricane001^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?)} 17:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment, alright, it's better to be safe than sorry, though... :P *Cremepuff222* 17:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Too few votes. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments since last closure. *Cremepuff222* 23:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

π = 3.141592653...

Please check the links to see what I mean. ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 02:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: See below. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 15:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Support. I like the actual meaning most. Maybe I'm a tad (heh heh) too much of a mathie, but someone could get confused. Chrishyman 20:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments have been made since I last closed this! *Cremepuff222* 23:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

π = 6,847,335

Edit one: Changed links and placed a variable ({{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}) that links to Irrational numbers. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 15:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Good idea! ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 15:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Question: I take it that you support this motto then? ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 15:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Yes! I support it! ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 16:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, sorry, I just don't like it. *Cremepuff222* 20:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose... I kinda get it, but pi doesn't equal 6,847,335, which is just going to bug me. I did fix the link to the stats page - you had it spelled wrong and it wasn't working, even though it was blue for some reason. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 02:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: That's why it's the way it is. Everyone knows that pi = 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937 ..., so this just puts a humorous and unexpected (in my opinion) twist on the value of π. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, no obvious consensus. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, no comments have been made since I last closed this! *Cremepuff222* 23:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikpedians, tonight we dine in hell!

alternative for below †Bloodpack† 03:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Puts back a negative spin on something that deserves it. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 15:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedians, tonight we dine in hell!

Edit 1 for spelling. bibliomaniac15 04:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: You could just fix the spelling in the original, since a spelling correction isn't major enough to deserve its own edit. ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 00:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandals, tonight you dine in hell!

Edit 2 from 300 movie †Bloodpack† 21:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Support Very clever, and it kind of shows vandals in a respectable (as in they are hard to stop, and do pose a threat) and I would like them to die and dine in hell. Redian (Talk) 05:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Reopened, not enough support for any one version. *Cremepuff222* 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak support. "Vandals" uses the term more accurately, but shouldn't it be "Vandals, tonight you dine in hell!"? Also, a bit extreme I suppose? I just hope it is not a violation of this, this, and this. – *Oppose all versions/ASTRO|A]]stroHurricane001^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)(+sign here+How's my editing?)} 18:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

how come these were approved? [1], [2], [3],

• Oppose all versions, per above links from Astro. *Cremepuff222* 00:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose all versions per User:Cremepuff222. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandals, tonight you dine in hell!

Edit 3 change the link of vandals, we're not condemning the person, but the act itself †Bloodpack† 23:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Rejected, not enough approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, it's the network.

(Edit 1) How about this. --Random ^{Say it here!} 14:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Reopened: Not enough discussion. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 18:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose, it's a tad boring. *Cremepuff222* 23:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose, Its not strong or clear enough for me. Redian (Talk) 22:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, doesn't seem to have any chance of approval. *Cremepuff222* 23:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Simple, yet effective.

Like it sais. I thought the Wikipedia prefix would be redundant. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 09:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Very good links and it follows the KISS principle. ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 13:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong support. It's a good one; per Magnus animum. --Tewy 17:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, because the motto is simple yet effective! ;-) *Cremepuff222* 17:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Simple but to the point. --Random ^{Say it here!} 17:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per Cremepuff (beat me to it) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 21:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Good enough twist!Kfc1864 07:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support Per Crempuff. ♠Tom@sBat 20:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support per all of the above. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Approves, consensus in favor. *Cremepuff222* 23:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

All good things come to an end… NOT!

Is the Wikipedia link too obvious? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) ^{(drop me a line)} 09:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Support: Correct! ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 14:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support, ha, ha! *Cremepuff222* 19:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support: Bingo. --Random ^{Say it here!} 20:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Support YES! (Insert maniacal laughter here) This is fantastic! (More laughter). —ScouterSig 16:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
• Support (claps)(laughter) (maniacal claps) (death) Well, maybe not....c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 11:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Approved Consensus n favor (Yay)c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

What he knows, we all benefit

From a linux ad. 201.143.38.67 22:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak oppose: Just not mottoey enough. ~ Magnus animuM ≈ √∞ 21:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose Pe r Magnus. I can;'t really understand.......c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 04:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Rejected, Sloppy.c'mon, we've fished a good one.Kfc1864Cuba Libre! 05:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)