Wikipedia:Peer review/Getting It: The psychology of est/archive1
Recently passed as a WP:GA, before that article appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know section. Would appreciate feedback on how to further improve the quality status of the article.
Thanks,
Cirt (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Addressing points from semi-automated peer review
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. -- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?] You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 02:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC) -
Done - As this was the only suggestion from the semi-automated peer review, looks like we're in good shape with the article as far as this review goes. Will continue to copy-edit and work on prose. Cirt (talk) 06:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC).
- Note
Peer review was listed at WP:PSYCHOLOGY and WP:BOOKS when review was started. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC).