Wikipedia:Peer review/Igor (album)/archive1

Igor (album)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get it to GA. Igor is among the most recognizable albums of the 2010s, and I think it at least deserves to be a quality article.

Thanks, 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{【=◈︿◈=】} 13:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LunaEclipse, this will be my first peer review, so I'd recommend a third point of view but here's what I identified as areas of improvement:

1. Why not add a See also section?

2. Why not incorporate audio segments into the article?

3. Why not add the year-end lists and industry award charts into the Charts area at the bottom of the article, and then add a "Accolades" subheading under Critical reception?

4. Can we expand on the Commerical performance section?

5. Perhaps an External links section to the album?

6. I did proof-read, but there's nothing that stood out to me in this area.

7. Archive any links in references that might be vulnerable to linkrot.

I did make a small edit, infobox spaces and changed a subheading to Notes. A good benchmark for GA-FA quality is to consult 4 (Beyonce album). AlaskanGrass (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dxneo

In addition to AlaskanGrass's above commemt, as for audio samples, the editor must pick at least one song from the album that best define the album and discuss it's sound, themes and lyrics thoroughly before they can attach the audio sample, but since they are aiming for GA (not FA), few lines will do.

I would suggest you add something about the certifications in the lead.

I think discussing the sound of the album in the body of the article is better than individually referencing each genre in the infobox.

Split Critical reception, and year-end lists and awards. Place year-end lists and awards under a new section, Accolades. See List of awards and nominations received by Tyler, the Creator and search "Igor" for its accolades.

To expand the Commercial performance section, you can easily turn the chart performance and certifications into prose. Also, don't forget to reuse the auto-generated refs.

Add the Release history section. I noticed that there's a standard edition and bonus edition.

Personnel: although the Tidal source is also fine, I think the media notes ref is enough, and Tidal is not necessary. What do you think?

Introduce External links section, and add Discorgs URL under the section.

Ref12: Red sources are highly discouraged, any reason why you find an alternative to DJBooth?

Ref15: You forgot to link The Source.

Ref: 19 Link The Fader

Ref30: Link Sputnikmusic

You forgot to link almost every website from ref31 down to the last ref.

Click here to quickly archive every reference as some of them are vulnerable to linkrot. dxneo (talk) 01:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]