Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Turf Moor/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've worked the last couple of days on this article to possibly nominate this at FAC and I'm curious where it stands in terms of quality. Is it comprehensive, covers it all details, is it clear? Any comments will be appreaciated.

Thanks, WA8MTWAYC (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

STANDARD NOTE: to get quicker and more responses to pre-FAC peer review requests, please remember to add your PR page to Template:FAC peer review sidebar. And when you close this peer review, please be sure to remove it from there. Also consider adding the sidebar to your userpage so you can help others by participating in other pre-FAC peer reviews. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Kosack

[edit]

I've had a run through and this is a few minor points that I picked out. I think this article is of sufficient quality for a run at FAC in any case. I haven't dug into the sourcing really, but you've been to FAC before so make sure your sourcing is tight etc. Kosack (talk) 11:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kosack Thank you very much for the review. I'll try to include an old map into the article. I've also requested a copy edit but I'm not sure if it's really needed. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 09:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]