Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Metropolitan Areas of Mexico
I wanted to place this map here for review while I finish rewriting this article (current draft here) as the current article uses an outdated definition. I created the image myself to illustrate the rewrite and I think it currently fits the criteria for becoming a Featured Picture, eventualy. Feedback would be appreciated. Thanks! -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 10:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Is there really nothing to say about this map? I could not be that good already, could it? -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 14:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments:
- I'm not an expert on the expectations of maps for FP, but I think that this is quite good. As I said, I'm really clueless about quality standards for maps, so my comment might not be much help (sorry). --Pharaoh Hound (talk) 12:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I would put the legend on the map... you have plenty of space and since you have all of the names you might as well have the densities. Other than that, the only problem I see is that... well, SVG images like this are becoming ubiquitous... and... this same map could be done for every other country... so while I do think it is very good... its goodness is fully dependent on it being one of the first of its kind. gren グレン 21:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Do other people get the dithering problem on the low-res version, or is it only my display? Other than that, I second the idea of putting the legend in the picture.Spyforthemoon 20:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback, I'll put up a new version with the legend soon. I haven't seen the dithering problem on my display, so it may be an issue with the colour-depth you've selected. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 22:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Seconder: