Science desk
< January 1	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 3 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

January 2

Identification of little egret's prey

I need help concerning the fish eaten by a little egret in a lagoon near Comacchio.

Could it be a pipefish species? --Leyo 01:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is a pipefish for sure, probably Syngnathus abaster because its short snout and lagoon environment that are typical for this species common in the north Adriatic sea.--Etrusko25 (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Are you sure enough that I may put the photographs into c:Category:Syngnathus abaster? --Leyo 23:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, quite a lot :)--Etrusko25 (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you. --Leyo 23:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name for when a person's face turns red when they are mad

Not blushing necessarily but just when your face turns red in response to anger. Is there a word for this? ScienceApe (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flushing (physiology) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both those links say it is called blushing when caused by anger. StuRat (talk) 04:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've check three dictionaries and they all say blushing is the result of embarrassment, shame, etc but not anger. I normally say flushed with anger.--Shantavira|^{feed me} 10:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You might also consider plethoric - Nunh-huh 10:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary lists apoplectic as "effused with blood" and calls it archaic. If the latter, so is my vocabulary. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's in the specific acception (is that an English word?) of facial color that it's archaic. That is, "apoplectic" is a word in reasonably common contemporary use, but in the sense of "extremely angry", not literally effused with blood. --Trovatore (talk) 21:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apoplexy is an archaic name for a stroke or cerebral haemorrhage but "apoplectic" still seems to be in use. Richerman (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Come on guys, we can't have archaic and eat it as well... 99.235.223.170 (talk) 01:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC) [reply]

You might get more/better answers at the "Language" Help Desk. This question is more about language than science. Just a suggestion. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]