Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 8

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jedward (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Someone just created this navigational template for a duo who have only released one single. All other links in the template are loosely related. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AE-nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I'm nominating this template to be deleted following the deletion of the majority of the articles linked to in this template. With only two of the articles in the template (likely) to be kept, I see little reason to keep a navbox for the company. Izno (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semxlit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, easily replaced in few transculsions. —Justin (koavf)TCM07:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indifferent, as creator. - Gilgamesh (talk) 13:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navigation with image (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, can be easily replaced in its few transculsions. —Justin (koavf)TCM06:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Europe (disambiguation) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete Unused in article and WP space; seems useless/pointless. Cybercobra (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taoism portal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant of {{Portal}}, unless there is something I am missing. —Justin (koavf)TCM09:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy as a (failed) testpage. Debresser (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sit Down, Shut Up (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template for a failed Fox animated series that is already covered by Infobox Television quite nicely. The entire template is broken and I don't understand why we would ever create an infobox for one television series. Nate (chatter) 09:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by PrimeHunter (talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G7. RL0919 (talk) 12:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification - UEFA Group Stage (2nd place) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Housekeeping reason. The WC qualification stage has finished for three months already. I don't think there would be more major edit here. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I request for a new editnotice template for the Template:UEFA Euro 2012 qualification (2nd place), i.e. Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:UEFA Euro 2012 qualification (2nd place). I suggest to copy this template but replacing the FIFA World Cup information into UEFA Euro 2012. Raymond "Giggs" Ko 06:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per T2 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PBS Sprout Specials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Malformatted; simply {{Navbox}} with no additional information, hasn't been edited since January 16, 2010. RJaguar3 | u | t 01:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.