Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 18

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

only used in one article Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused in one article Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

provides no navigation Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

UK TOCs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:UK TOCs. This has already been carried out, so a TROUT to the nominator for doing things out of process (even though it was unanimous). Primefac (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Current UK TOCs with Template:Defunct UK TOCs.

Propose merging 3 templates Template:Current UK TOCs, Template:Defunct UK TOCs and Template:Future UK TOCs. They each cross-link but this is problematic, in that when clicked, they take the user out of the main article space and into a separate template, which is not good practice. I propose merging these three templates into a single template using Template:Navbox with collapsible groups. This will ensure users are not directed out of the article namespace, reduce unnecessary proliferation of templates and make it easier to make future updates (e.g. when a franchise is changed). The result will look something like this:

I think this will be an improvement. Cnbrb (talk) 17:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template - was used by parent in 2012, is no longer, no uses. Bellezzasolo Discuss 16:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stub that hasn't been updated for 6 months, no category. Bellezzasolo Discuss 16:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Albanian Progressive Party/meta/color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 01:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, per prior deletion of unused meta/color templates. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).