Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 4
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Template:New Year's Eve (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Ahmetlii with the reason "Disused template" FASTILY 22:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Urhixidur (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This is a confusing name for the template, as this template calculates Chinese New Year eve, not Western. Techie3 (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not used anywhere; misleading name and content. HĐ (talk) 04:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Per WP:G7 Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Pointless and potentially inconsistent. {{val}} already provides this functionality in a way that is consistent with other number and unit displays. Lithopsian (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient complexity of markup to warrant a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)- Speedy delete per WP:G7. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Urhixidur (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Same reasons as above Kepler-1229b talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a war map template. However, there is no war in India. The map has not been edited in about 2 years (because nothing is happening). There were some skirmishes with China and Pakistan, however they were not something that we would put on this kind of map. All this does not warrant a war map for India. As of now, the map doesn't show anything contested. So in other terms, it is a map of “Indian insurgency and wars”, yet it shows zero insurgency and war in India. It is basically no different from a geographic map. The India template should have never been created. It is important to delete this template because many people might put more time and effort into it. In any case, I have the code saved on my computer if there is ever a war in India and we need to re-create this template. Finally, I want to note that I am also nominating the associated module for deletion as well: Module:Indian insurgency and wars detailed map. Tradediatalk 14:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. As the creator of that template, I have no plans to work on it in any time soon since I have other priorities to do. MarioJump83! 23:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
MTV Video Music Awards for Best Pop Video (1990s, 2000s, 2010s)
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Pop Video 1990s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Pop Video 2000s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Pop Video 2010s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Originally created as sub-templates for Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Pop Video, but that template is now comprehensive without these three sub-templates. As a result, these three templates have fallen into disuse. HĐ (talk) 10:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 18. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).