Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that won't need constant updating and should be substituted onto the respective articles these are used on. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that won't need constant updating and should be substituted onto the respective articles these are used on. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that won't need constant updating. 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999 should be substituted onto the respective chamber election articles. 2003 to 2019 are unused as the chamber election articles use a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be substituted on the Belgian regional election articles where these are used since they are single-use templates and per the standard for other Belgian regional election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates that should be substituted on the respective Belgian EU election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Should be substituted onto the 2019 Belgian regional elections article under the German-speaking Community Parliament section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates particulary, 1987, 1991, 1995, and 1999 should be substituted onto the respective articles. 2003, 2007, and 2010 are unused as the electon articles use a different table for the results. The senate election/top doesn't serve much purpose as it's used on the 2007 and 2010 templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hanover S-bahn templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{s-line}} templates for the Hanover S-Bahn. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Hanover S-Bahn. All transclusions replaced. There are 18 dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates and should be transcluded on the respective German federal election articles since these won't require constant updating. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be transcluded where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and redundant as the articles use different tables for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use. 2001, 2005, 2009 should be substituted onto the respective articles for those election years. 2013 and 2017 are unused as there exists no mainspace for them to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant as the article for the 1997 parliamentary election uses a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Norway Local Election Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2007 Nordland County template is unused, but should be transcluded onto the 2007 Norwegian local elections. The same goes for the county and municipal templates since they are single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Netherlands EU Elections

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the very top, the European Parliament election, 1979 (Netherlands) template is unused as the article about the election uses a different table. For every other template, they should be substituted where used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template:European Parliament election, 1979 (Netherlands) and Template:European Parliament election, 1984 (Netherlands) as the election articles use different tables and these are unused. Subst and delete the results and European groups to the relevant year election article and subst the candidate lists to the party list articles and section transclude them to the relevant election articles. Gonnym (talk) 18:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A redundant single-use template as the 1994 referendum article already uses a different table. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a legitimate election template and used on the wrong articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused as the respective 2006 and 2012 articles use a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Finland Elections

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use templates that should be transcluded where used. The 2021 municipal and 2018 presidential templates are redundant as the respective articles use a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant and unused template. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 14:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only four links and transclusions. The majority of the links are red and don't believe this template subject matter has notability that requires its own template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:00, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).