Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/SMS König
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| Toolbox |
|---|
Another German battleship article. This passed GA just last week, and I think it's ready for A-class. I appreciate any and all comments that help me improve the article towards an eventual FAC. Thanks in advance. Parsecboy (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- No problems reported with external links. One map image needs alt text. Due to a malfunction, I am currently unable to check disambig links.
- In the construction section you 45 million goldmarks; as before I would like to (eventually) see an adjusted for inflation value. Not holding this against you, just something to add when and if you finally locate a converter.
- Otherwise it looks good. Well Done! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Looks good, but I'd like to see some description of the repairs she presumably underwent after Jutland. You mention somewhat extensive damage, and then suddenly she's conducting battle operations against the Russians, with no discussion where or how long the repairs were. – Joe N 15:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for reviewing the article. I added a few lines about the repairs to the "Jutland" section. Parsecboy (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Dab tool seems to be up again which was holding up my support; no dab links reported here, so here is the support :) TomStar81 (Talk) 18:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Just tweaked one note for expression, apart from that it all looks good - well done again! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.