Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2015-08-12

Single-page Edition

WP:POST/1

12 August 2015

News and notes
Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA

In the media
Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj

Forum
Community voices on paid editing

Wikimanía report
Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event

Traffic report
Fighting from top to bottom

Featured content
Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons

Technology report
Tech news in brief

Blog
The Hunt for Tirpitz

2015-08-12

Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA

Contribute —

Share this

By Resident Mario and Gamaliel

Superprotect, one year later

Superprotect is now one year old, as noted in a discussion in the Wikimedia-L mailing list this week. Superprotect was a novel page protection level implemented on August 10 last year, without warning, to allow Wikimedia Foundation staff to resolve an ongoing wheel war with community administrators on the German Wikipedia; the administrators were attempting to use a change to a MediaWiki configuration page to locally disable the then-new MediaViewer software.

The administrators were acting on the results of a community poll that had reached an undisputed consensus: the community's editors (mirroring editors on the English Wikipedia as well) regarded Media Viewer as an unfinished product—one that was not ready for use on their project. But the requisite change was rejected by the Foundation, which, as the owner of the servers, was in a position to overrule community consensus. This was not the first time that the WMF had overruled community consensus. "Limits to configuration changes" on Meta lists types of instances that may involve central overruling, stating that:

“

Rarely, a local community consensus will emerge for a particular wiki configuration change that is technically feasible to implement, but is rejected by the [WMF's] system administrators. Arguably this is a demonstration of a technocracy, or a necessity to preserve the founding principles and our mission.

”

The page lists nine instances in which a change was rejected outright and three in which the change was partially rejected. Before superprotect, the incident that caused the most social tension was ACTRIAL, a successful April 2011 proposal on the English Wikipedia to limit article creation to autoconfirmed accounts; it was similarly blocked at the implementation level. The Foundation's rejection provoked a significant conflagration with the community, which included terse conversations between editors and Foundation staff in the fallout reportage in the Signpost. This, however, was nowhere near as controversial as superprotect would come to be.

The German Wikipedia administrator realized that, unlike the case of ACTRIAL, it was possible to force through the change they wished to make with only a local edit to that site's MediaWiki page. They were promptly reverted by Foundation staff and informed that making "breaking" changes to the wiki configuration files was improper. The administrator persisted, and the WMF introduced and immediately applied what it called "superprotect" to the page.

Enough words have been written about the ensuing firestorm. The meta-wiki "superprotect" page lists no fewer than eight separate statements and consultations released by the Foundation in the wake of the resulting outrage. In the case of MediaViewer, the WMF stood firm on refusing to allow it to be disabled—and enforced this by threat of de-sysopping—and superprotect remains installed on the German Wikipedia, although it was taken off the page in question. An open letter circulated in the community condemning the action, garnering almost a thousand signatures. An English Wikipedia arbitration committee case was opened, with animated debate, and closed without action. For Signpost coverage from the time, refer to the Media Viewer series.

The memory of superprotect appears to be fresh in the hearts and minds of both experienced editors and Foundation personnel. Since the event, executive director Lila Tretikov focused WMF staff on increasing community feedback as much as possible—a big plank in Tretikov's platform for the organization. A prominent question of community candidates for the Board of Trustees just months ago concerned superprotect. Two of the re-standing candidates were sympathetic to the issue, while the third was on the fence; none was re-elected, whereas three strongly opposed to the use of superprotect were (prominent long-time editor and superprotect critic Pete Forsyth (Peteforsyth) was almost giddy with the results).

What do you think about the issue? The Signpost is currently soliciting two essays on the propriety of superprotect from the community—one in support, one against—soon to be published in a forum op-ed. R

Contentious RfA draws nearly 300 participants

Votes per day in the Request for Adminship of Liz

English Wikipedian Liz was nominated for administrator on July 27.

A current trainee clerk for the Arbitration Committee, she has been editing since 2013 with her current account, and since 2007 with a previous account (she has also done a great deal of categorization work in the Signpost archives). She was nominated by three administrators: Worm That Turned, a former arbitrator, Yunshui, a current arbitrator, and The Blade of the Northern Lights. Their nomination described her as "a versatile candidate", who "has demonstrated empathy, understanding and helpfulness" and is "a model of diplomacy and discretion when dealing with complex, heated issues".

The nomination quickly gained much support, with more than 100 supporters in two days. However, concerns were raised about Liz's focus on noticeboard discussions and wikignome activity, and a perceived lack of content creation. In the words of one editor, she has a "disproportionate focus on drama boards as opposed to content involvement".

While a number of her advocates highlighted her support for content creation, Liz wrote "the role of administrators is undermined if there is the impression that there are different standards for behavior based on an editor's contributions and the view that some editors are unblockable", a statement that may have been perceived negatively. DD2K, a supporter, wrote that many voters opposed her nomination "because Liz dared make the statement that content creators should not be given carte blanche exemptions from the rules. Everyone knows this."

The nomination attracted offsite attention, including discussions on Wikipediocracy and r/KotakuinAction, a pro-Gamergate forum on Reddit. While not a named party to the Gamergate arbitration case, she is one of many Wikipedians whose involvement in editing and discussing Gamergate-related articles has drawn the ire of Gamergate supporters (as has this author).

Bureaucrats struck votes and comments by two accounts thought to be a "sole purpose GamerGate account". One of them, Auerbachkeller, belongs to Slate tech writer David Auerbach, who lodged complaints about the bureaucrat decision on two different Wikipedia noticeboards. (Last year, he commented frequently on arbitration case pages and got into a public spat with one of the named parties to the case.) The offsite discussions and stricken comments prompted many users to complain that the nomination had fallen victim to canvassing.

The nomination was closed on August 4 with 200 supports, 72 opposes, and nine neutrals. Requests for adminship states that "most of those above 75 percent approval pass and most of those below 70 percent fail". With support at about 73.5%, a bureaucrat discussion was opened to determine whether or not the nomination would pass. Following the discussion, Liz was promoted to administrator on August 6.

When asked on her user talkpage if she thought gender played a role in the discussion, she wondered whether her female username prompted editors to react differently: "I was struck by how some of the critical comments were very personal, about me as a person, my faults and why I was unsuitable. I've participated in over a dozen RfAs and probably read over two dozen more in preparing for this RfA and it's not typical that voters get that personal. [...] I think this happens to more often to women than men. [...] One is not judged by one's skills but how you make other people feel." G

Brief notes

Slides from this month's metrics and activities meeting.

Metrics and activities: The monthly metrics and activities IRC meeting was held by the Wikimedia Foundation on August 6. R
Netherlands survey: Wikimedia Netherlands have released the results of an editor survey conducted on the site. The conclusions, drawn against a sample size of 451 respondents, are worth reading for anyone interested in editor demographics. The recent full-scale general editor survey conducted by the Wikimedia Foundation was concluded in 2012, and although a follow-up is under discussion local surveys provide the most recent data. A few data points of interest: 57% of Dutch editors also edit the English Wikipedia some of the time, with 13% reporting that it is their primary wiki; awareness of Wikimedia Netherlands is high (sampling bias?) and the gender ratio is pegged at 89% to 11%. R
Round-table notes: The notes from a community round-table have been posted to meta. The focus of the discussion was product development interactions between community volunteers and software architects on staff.
WLM: Organization of the 2015 round of Wiki Loves Monuments has begun. R
1 Million: Fæ published a blog post on the Wikimedia Blog this week describing his experiences getting to a million images uploaded on Commons. R
Natural world editing: Wikimedia India published a summary of the outcomes from a natural world editathon held in Bangalore last week. R
This Month: in GLAM has been published. R
New administrators: Cyclonebiskit and Liz (see the story above) are this week's newest English Wikipedia administrators. R

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj

Contribute —

Share this

By Gamaliel

Paid editing in the spotlight again

Wikipedia traffic from Google drops 250 million visits

The last three months of Wikipedia traffic, from the August 2015 WMF Metrics & Activities Meeting

Business Insider reports that Wikipedia traffic from the search engine Google has experienced a significant drop. It recounts analysis from a July 28 blog post by Roy Hinkins, head of search engine optimization for SimilarWeb, a web analytics company. Hinkins writes:

“

Wikipedia lost an insane amount of traffic in the past 3 months. And by insane I mean that the free encyclopedia site lost more than 250 million desktop visits in just 3 months!

”

Business Insider speculates that the drop is due to Google's growing "preference for inserting its own content above the content of other non-Google web sites, even when those sites may be better resources than Google itself", though it notes " there is no evidence that Wikipedia's traffic loss is due to Google".

The drop in traffic was noted at the Wikimedia Foundation August Metrics & Activities meeting (see graphic at right), though the meeting did not discuss a potential cause. Elsewhere, a number of experienced editors are attributing the drop to the normal summer decrease in Wikipedia traffic. (Aug. 12)

Nicki Minaj complains about her boyfriend's Wikipedia article

Nicki Minaj is displeased

Music news outlets noted that singer Nicki Minaj took to Instagram, where she has 31.2 million followers, to complain about the Wikipedia article for her boyfriend, rapper Meek Mill. Whenever she posted Mill's birth name, Rihmeek, she was inundated with complaints and mockery on social media for "misspelling" his name, because his Wikipedia article spelled it "Rahmeek". She posted a picture of herself with Mill and his family and wrote:

“

Everytime I say the name "Rihmeek" in a post I get a billion comments saying I'm spelling his name wrong. Lol. Hmmmmm. Lemme get this straight, I should believe Wikipedia over his MOTHER, SISTER (@naboogie) AND HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?????? 😂 yall gotta chill. #NoMoreCommentsAboutHisNAMEpls #TakeHisGirlWordForIt 😁😛😂 #StayOffWikipedia #YallReallyBeMad 😩😘😘😘😘😘😘😘

”

Neither Minaj nor the media outlets noted that the incorrect spelling in Meek's Wikipedia article was cited to a biography page on the website of his own record label, Roc Nation, where the error remains. (Aug. 8)

Editor's note: Emoticons in the above quote may not be visible on all computers.

In brief

Peter Dinklage is amused

New CEO, new edit war: The Hindu reports on the furious editing on the article for Sundar Pichai following the annoucement that he would be the next CEO of Google. While there was no dispute over his graduate education in the US, editors attempted to claim him as an undergraduate alumnus of a number of different schools in India. The Next Web noted that over 250 edits were made during the edit war. (Aug. 12)
Bieber or Swift?: The New York Observer reports on the debate about which celebrities should be included in the Wikipedia article Millennials. (Aug. 11)
Liberland Über Alles: A lengthy profile in The New York Times Magazine of Vít Jedlička, founder of the micronation Liberland, notes that the land comprising the country was discovered by consulting the Wikipedia article Terra nullius. (Aug. 11)
Another plagiarism case: Spanish language media reports that sports journalist Sara Carbonero is alleged to have plagiarized Wikipedia in an August 5 blog post for Elle about her new home Porto, Portugal. (Aug. 10)
Identity crisis: Actor Peter Dinklage told The Guardian that, contrary to what it said in his Wikipedia article, his daughter's name was not Zelig. He said "But it’s hilarious that that’s a fact in Wikipedia." When asked if he wanted a correction, he replied "I don’t care!" The name was cited to articles from Gather.com and The Daily Mail. (Aug. 9)
Accessing history: The Hans India reports on efforts by Telugu Wikipedians to provide access to rare Telugu language works via Wikisource. (Aug. 7)
Support your local fireman: Channel 4 reports on "A year in the life of Whitehall's Wikipedia warriors", examining edits from IP addresses assigned to the UK government. The most frequently edited article was that of author Simon Bucher-Jones and the edits included "a detailed 800-word analysis of the characters in the children's TV series Fireman Sam". (Aug. 7)
Nature editathon: The Hindu reports on a Wikipedia editathon in Bengaluru focused on wildlife and the natural world. (Aug. 6)
"How can I change my Wikipedia page?": In an interview with the Naples Daily News, comedian Heather McDonald said that while the list of impressions she is known for in her Wikipedia article includes many male impressions, she only impersonates women. (Aug. 6)

Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit next week's edition in the Newsroom or contact the editor.

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Community voices on paid editing

Contribute —

Share this

By Smartse, Sphilbrick, CorporateM, Timtrent, FreeRangeFrog, and Sportsguy17

In this week's Signpost, we've collected a sampling of viewpoints on paid editing. Each contributor discussed the effect they believe paid editing has on the project and how we can handle it better.

Smartse

It is impossible to lump all paid editing together, since it ranges from those deceptively using sockpuppets to evade scrutiny and create promotional articles on non-notable subjects to others who openly disclose and use high quality sources to write neutral content. In my experience though, paid editing is overall a net negative for the project as the few good paid editors are vastly outnumbered by the rest. The net effect is to decrease the neutrality and quality of the project as a whole. It also encourages others to create articles on the basis of other crap existing which leads to a vicious cycle (see for example Tuft & Needle and Casper). A considerable amount of volunteer effort is required to clean up the mess when we could potentially be creating other content.

Paid editing is inevitable so long as anyone can edit. Dealing with it requires the right balance of carrot and stick so as to tolerate and assist those who are open, while taking a hard line with those who are not here to write an encyclopedia. The bright line is good in principle, but there aren't enough volunteers who want to review paid edits, particularly if explaining the problems will take a substantial amount of effort. Further, our current terms of use, policies and guidelines don't provide sufficient punishment for those who fail to disclose or continue to edit mainspace. If we applied the principle of WP:DENY to undisclosed paid editors then it may encourage more to play by the rules. I'd also like to see a bot like cluebot that flagged edits to corporate and BLP articles that could be paid editing. Our methods of detection are inconsistent and haven't improved since I started editing 6 years ago.

SmartSE is a Wikipedia administrator and has been an editor since 2008.

SPhilbrick

I support the allowance of paid editing, but only with careful monitoring. All editors have the potential of bias with the possibility that their contributions might be more positive or negative rather than truly neutral. This is a challenge that applies to all edits and all editors. However, in the case of paid editors, we know there is a strong built-in potential for bias. Some paid editors will manage to provide new content, but others even if unconsciously, will lean toward a more favorable coverage of their client. If the position is known, their contributions can be scrutinized by others through that lens, and the resulting article can be a neutral article. Without identification of the status of the editor, it becomes much more difficult to ensure neutrality.

We have the concept of pending changes which applies to articles. Perhaps we should find a way to apply the concept to editors. If all declared editors were subject to a pending change requirement, it might be a useful way of allowing paid content while maintaining strict scrutiny of the content.

S Philbrick is a Wikipedia administrator and has been an editor since 2008.

CorporateM (paid editor)

Out of more than 100 assessments I provided to article-subjects, I found that their objectives were aligned with Wikipedia's content policies 30% of the time. I estimate that 10-20% of COI edits are useful, but less than 10% are acting in bad-faith. The majority of article-subjects are well-meaning, but make poor edits, because their motives for editing skew their point-of-view. This is also true of former employees, legal antagonists, etc. Most of the time they can be persuaded to abstain through patient and authoritative consulting, whereas in some cases there are borderline attack pages, factual errors, or other circumstances where their participation is desirable.

There is a lot we can do to improve things. An outreach and education program for article-subjects and their representatives with a focus on abstaining could target the bulk of cases. For a small number of cases (~1%) where there is a persistent and bad-faith violation of the Terms of Use, legal enforcement is needed. All the Wikipedia jargon that has made WP:COI incomprehensible to PR people is another issue and I think requiring a minimum disclosure, rather than an excessive one, would reduce drama, harassment and other nonsense, while promoting a focus on content instead of editors.

CorporateM has been a Wikipedia editor since 2009

Timtrent

If the edits are impartial, neutral and do not seek to pervert Wikipedia and its articles and have no WP:OWN connotations, either of edits or of articles, then I applaud all good quality edits and deprecate all poor quality ones, exactly as I do with amateur editing

The challenge is to enforce it. I favour the commercial editor declaring their interest(s) on their user page and their deploying {{Connected contributor}} with all parameters filled out on the talk page of each article they contribute to in their commercial persona. I do not support separate accounts for commercial and non commercial use unless they are properly declared on the user pages concerned. I favour strong but not draconian enforcement of declarations as a matter of policy.

Timtrent has been a Wikipedia editor since 2006.

FreeRangeFrog

I have no problem in principle with paid editing, as long as it is done honestly and in the open. But we must be more proactive in battling stealth paid editing. The for-hire creation or modification of articles by a person or company who would otherwise be unconnected to the subjects of those articles, without clear previous disclosure, is the type of activity we must endeavor to stop because it undermines the trust readers place on us. There is too much potential for abuse, and we have seen that recently where for-profit "editors" (I use that term lightly here) stoop to blackmail in order to keep the money rolling in. This reflects negatively on Wikipedia because often the victim thinks this is the norm around here, or that it is somehow done with the blessing of the community or the Foundation. The COI guidelines must be revamped and made into a policy with teeth and clear avenues of action for administrators and editors to follow. There are conversations we must have as a community and major changes to be made if we are to remain a truly free and truly neutral source of information that the world trusts.

FreeRangeFrog is a Wikipedia administrator and has been an editor since 2009.

Sportsguy17

Ever since I started editing on this site, my views about COI and paid editing have changed dramatically, primarily due to reviewing some GA nominations substantially written by CorporateM, who has openly admitted to being paid and having a COI. Unfortunately, I at first made the impulsive decision of quick failing one of the nominations simply because this editor was paid and there was a COI. I had made that poor decision because of my own ignorance and stereotyping. However, after requesting that it be re-reviewed, I agreed to look over it again more closely and found that not only was the article in question neutral, but very informative and well-written. From that day on, it made me realize that just because an editor is getting paid and/or has a COI doesn't mean that they are here to harm the encyclopedia (in fact, there are quite a few that are assets to this project). In conclusion, I don't have a problem with paid editors and editors with a COI editing this site as long as the site is being benefitted by their contributions and not harming/disrupting the project in anyway, shape or form. I really hope that this piece can help the community realize that not all paid editors and COI editors are here for their own benefits and be a bit more accepting as a whole.

Sportsguy17 has been a Wikipedia editor since 2013.

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event

Contribute —

Share this

By Peaceray

For the first installment, see part 1, the plenaries

For those who generally only edit on the English Wikipedia project, it is quite an experience to hobnob with attendees from nearly forty countries, ^{[Note 1]} over six continents (alas, no WikiProject Penguins from Antartica), and representing about four dozen languages and their respective Wikipedias.^{[Note 2]} There were also those who primarily work on other Wikimedia projects and other WMF websites, such as Wikimedia Commons, Wikimedia Meta-Wiki, Wikidata, Wikisource, Wiktionary, Wikivoyage, MediaWiki, and Phabricator. There was non-Wikimedia open source/open data representation there as well, such as Mozilla México in the Community Village and a mapping party for OpenStreetMap.

Meetups

The Wiki-wedding of Israeli Wikimedians Darya and Avner Kantor

Inter- and intra- were the applicable geographical prefixes, as meetups were intra-continental: WikiAfrica, Wikimedia Asia, Central and Eastern Europe Wikimedians, and the Canada and United States affiliates, intra-language/inter-continental: WikiArabia, WikiFranca, Iberocoop, and Turkic Speaking Wikimedians, intra-country: Wikimedia Deutschland (Germany) and the Mexican Wikipedians, and the inter-language, intra-country, and internationally diasporic Indic Meetup. Thematic meetups included the Wikipedia Education Program, LGBT and allied Wikimedians, OTRS volunteers, Wikidata editors, Wikipedia Librarians, the WikiProject Med Foundation, a Wikiwomen's Lunch, and a joint Wiktionary-Wikidata Meetup. There was even a meetup for a Wiki Wedding.

Meeting the WMF employees and board members

The Community Engagement ~~subway map~~ organization chart presented at the Q&A

Unless you hang out in San Francisco, you will seldom have a chance to meet Wikimedia Foundation employees. Wikimania is an excellent venue for meeting dozens of them. A prime spot for this was the WMF booth. The Wikimedia Design Research team also staffed a table in the Community Village as well where they conducted surveys and interviews about how editors contribute to wiki projects on mobile devices. Attendees could engage with reorganized Community Engagement team leaders in a mediated Q&A panel discussion, or go to a Wikimedia Engineering Management Q&A, a WMF Legal presentation on defending users and content, or a Q&A with the WMF Board. There was also ample opportunity to meet individual staff and learn from them. It was intriguing to learn that the WMF uses Apache Cassandra as a back-end database to deliver content used by VisualEditor to retrieve page HTML for editing or that the search tool now provides intitle: and incategory: parameters.

Programme sessions

Wikimania 2015 Attendees T-Shirt Design

The substance of Wikimania is in the sessions presented by editors and staff for the rest of us. The Programme included tracks on Education, GLAM, Community, Tech, and Legal issues. Of the plethora of sessions, below are just a few that stood out among those attended by this editor.

"The coolest projects of Wikimedia Chapters": This session presented a number of inspiring projects, including Wikicamps for Western Armenian editors (see also one of the reports), a project in which primary students in Herzliya, Israel contributed information to Wikipedia about their city and local history (see previous Signpost coverage), and the "Sum of all paintings" (see below).
The "Sum of all paintings", in which Maarten Dammers (Multichill) presented the WikiProject for entering the metadata for paintings into Wikidata.
"My life as an autistic Wikipedian" by Guillaume Paumier (Guillom), also the subject of his Signpost op-ed two weeks ago.
Content Translation, already used in over 10,000 articles, had a hands-on translathon and discussion.

For more info

Videos

Despite the dearth of official videos of Wikimanía 2015 sessions, as reported by the Signpost, some individuals took the initiative to record session and other videos. These can be found at Wikimania 2015 presentation videos on Commons, Wikimania 2015 videos on Internet Archive, and miscellaneous "Wikimania 2015" videos on YouTube.

Slide decks

Elsewhere on the web

"Wikimania 2015 in Words, Images, and Tweets". The Wikipedian. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
Ziko's Mexican_diary
Iberty's blog on Wikimania, 12.07.15 - 19.07.15
"Wikimania 2015 At Mexico City, Mexico". seen.co.

Notes

^ Algeria, Armenia, Austria, Australia, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Catalonia, Costa Rica, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Egypt, France, Georgia, Germany, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Namibia, Nepal, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippenes, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, Tanzania, Ukraine, the U.K., the U.S., and Uzbekistan. Whew!
^ Ancient Greek - grc, Arabic - ar, Armenian (Eastern & Western) - hy, Assamese - as, Bengali - bn, Bishnupriya Manipuri - bpy, Catalan - ca, Chinese - zh, Czech - cs, Dutch - nl, English - en, Esperanto - eo, Estonian - et, French - fr, German - de, Hebrew - he, Hindi - hi, Indonesian - id, Italian - it, Japanese - ja, Javanese - jv, Kannada - kn, Kashmiri - ks, Latin - la, Lithuanian - lt, Malayalam - ml:, Marathi - mr:, Nepali - ne, Norwegian - no, Oriya - or, Panjabi - pa, Polish - pl, Portuguese - pt, Russian - ru, Sanskrit - sa, Serbian - sr, Serbo-Croatian - sh, Slovak - sk, Spanish - es, Swahili - sw, Swedish - sv, Tagalog - tl, Tamil - ta, Ukranian - uk, Urdu - ur, Uzbek - uz, Venetian - vec, Vietnamese - vi, and Western Panjabi - pnb

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Fighting from top to bottom

Contribute —

Share this

By Milowent

The charts are led this week by UFC women's champion Ronda Rousey, who won her last match at UFC 190 (#9) in 34 seconds. And at the bottom of the top 10 is Donald Trump, the highly improbable leading candidate for the Republican nomination in the 2016 Presidential elections. Of course, the election is 15 months away, which is light years in politics. The Top 10 also saw two high profile deaths in British singer Cilla Black (#3), and American wrestler Roddy Piper (#8). Aside from American films, and another strong showing from Indian cinema, a few more American debate related topics appear further down the Top 25. (A bonus chart of the candidates ranked by views follows below.)

For the full top-25 list, see WP:TOP25. See this section for an explanation of any exclusions. For a list of the most edited articles of the week, see here.

For the week of August 2 to 8, 2015, the 10 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the most viewed pages, were:

Rank	Article	Views	Notes
1	Ronda Rousey	2,049,053	UFC 190 fell on August 1, which was the day before last week's report was published, so the reaction to that match, during which the undefeated UFC women's bantamweight champion beat Bethe Correia in 34 seconds in Correia's home town of Rio de Janeiro, really only came through this week. Still, she managed to get on the list last week too. Apparently Correia had been trash talking Rousey prior to the fight, which strikes me as a rather odd thing to do to someone who a) has never lost a fight and b) won her last fight in 14 seconds, except as a ploy to get better ratings.
2	A. P. J. Abdul Kalam	933,223	The sustained surge of views this scientist and reluctant politician received upon his death last week at the age of 83 is merely a reflection of the regard in which he was held by his fellow Indians. A Muslim in a predominantly Hindu country, he rose to the very top of the political ladder, first as a developer of India's missile and nuclear programs, and then as President. Despite adhering to Islam, he considered himself an Indian and drew much inspiration from his country's Hindu heritage. As a result, his one term as President was one of the most popular in his country's history. A lifelong advocate of technology, he believed that India could become a developed country through embracing and expanding its knowledge base.
3	Cilla Black	796,775	Topics of purely British interest almost never make the top 25 (Britain's population can't compete with America or India, even if you factor in countries that share its pop culture, like Australia) and when they do they rarely reach this high. So that should tell any non-Brits reading this just how popular Cilla Black, who died this week, was in her home country. A native of Liverpool, she began her career as a singer in the innocent days of early 60s pop and achieved great success thanks to promotion by her fellow Liverpudlians The Beatles. She then became a fixture in British households for almost four decades, hosting a series of variety shows, game shows and hidden camera shows, eventually becoming the highest paid female performer in British television. Part of her appeal was that, unlike many in her position, she never abandoned her Liverpool roots, retaining her accent and mannerisms throughout her career. (This entry summary helpfully provided by Serendipodous, as my vague non-British knowledge of Ms. Black is limited to recalling some Smiths connection or homage to her in the past.)
4	Deadpool	793,190	The article on this fictional Marvel Comics antihero surged in popularity on August 5 with the debut of a trailer for upcoming film of the same name starring Ryan Reynolds (pictured), which will be released on February 12, 2016, in North America.
5	Fantastic Four (2015 film)	788,731	Another Marvel Comics movie, including Miles Teller (pictured) among the top-billed cast, the film premiered in New York on August 4 and was released in theaters on August 7. The film was panned by critics and audiences alike and underperformed at the box office, earning only $25.7 million in North America during its opening weekend. However, a sequel is already scheduled to be released on June 9, 2017.
6	Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation	719,059	Up from #19 and 340,226 views last week. The box office draw of Tom Cruise (pictured) may have flagged of late, but he can always return to his signature franchise, which has yet to let him down. The fifth installment in the Mission: Impossible series was released on July 31 and had a hefty $56 million opening weekend, all but ensuring a part 6.
7	Bajrangi Bhaijaan	686,399	Down from #4 and 948,650 views last week. Bollywood's Muslim-targeted counterprogramming to the raging box office tsunami of Baahubali: The Beginning, starring Hindu/Muslim superstar Salman Khan (pictured) and opening on Eid weekend, made Rs 200 crore ($31.2 million) in its first nine days, and earned support from legends like Shekhar Kapur. But Khan's tweets in apparent support of Yakub Memon have led to posters for the film being defaced in some areas.
8	Roddy Piper	646,146	Down from #3 and 1,086,945 views last week. Wikipedia readers love their wrestlers, and so the death of "Rowdy" Roddy Piper, world-renowned WWF and WCW heel, at the relatively young age of 61, was bound to stir emotions. In the ring, "Hot Rod" played up his Scottish roots, affecting the rage of a Glaswegian football hooligan and entering to the sound of bagpipes, for which he was named (his real last name, incidentally, was Toombs, which you would think would be a perfectly acceptable wrestling name).
9	UFC 190	638,825	See #1. Performing better than UFC 189, which had 557K views when it appeared on the Top 25 a few weeks ago. And for whatever reason UFC 188 didn't make the list at all in June, but UFC 187 did in May.
10	Donald Trump	614,810	The larger-than-life real estate developer and media personality nicknamed "The Donald" continues to flummox the American media, as Trump stood center stage in the first major Republican candidates debate on August 6, and is the candidate currently ranked highest in the polls. Many thought the questions he received from the Fox News anchors, including Megyn Kelly (#15), were aimed at ending his reign, but subsequent polls suggest his lead is increasing. How do you explain this craziness? Well, first of all, it is almost 15 months until the U.S. presidential election. Outside the focused political media and hard core Republicans, no one cares yet! He won't be the nominee. As seen above, wrestling and UFC is more popular at this point, taking 3 of the top 10 spots. Second, a large core of Republicans fear illegal immigration, because they've been taught to fear it in order to draw votes away from Democratic candidates. Trump's frank talk on this issue (despite veering into likely racism) appeals to that base. Many Americans are simply watching Trump "for the lulz".

Bonus chart - US Republican Presidential candidates

Rank	Candidate	Views
1	Donald Trump	614,810
2	Ben Carson	403,620
3	Carly Fiorina	393,404
4	John Kasich	214,815
5	Jeb Bush	204,989
6	Ted Cruz	184,220
7	Marco Rubio	173,578
8	Rand Paul	131,158
9	Chris Christie	86,011
10	Bobby Jindal	66,431
11	Scott Walker	65,585
12	Lindsey Graham	58,671
13	Mike Huckabee	55,729
14	Rick Perry	37,395
15	Rick Santorum	33,657
16	Jim Gilmore	30,236
17	George Pataki	27,769

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons

Contribute —

Share this

By Xanthomelanoussprog, Hafspajen, and Bgwhite

Mirza zaza, the newly described species of giant mouse lemur, looking a bit terrified at the Ankylosaur head.
Ankylosaur head.
The JC's Girls founder, Heather Veitch

This week we cover material promoted from 26 July to 1 August.

Featured articles

Fourteen Featured articles were promoted this week.

Ankylosaurus (nominated by FunkMonk and LittleJerry) The Ankylosaurus or "fused lizard' was an armoured dinosaur, extant about 68–66 million years ago. It walked on four legs and had a beak on its snout and a club at the end of its tail. The largest specimens were probably about 20 feet (6.5 m) long, 6 feet (2 m) wide and weighed about 6 tons.
Eta Carinae (nominated by Lithopsian and Casliber) Eta Carinae is a stellar system about 7500 light years away. It's reckoned that the system has at least two stars which together outshine our sun by a factor of five million. The brightness of the system is variable; between 1837 and 1856 it got brighter in what Victorian astronomers called the Great Eruption. During three days in March 1843, it was the second-brightest star in the sky (it was regarded as a single star until the middle of last century). After the 1850s Eta Carinae faded until in 1886 it was not visible to the naked eye. It brightened again, faded again and has since brightened considerably, doubling in 1998–1999. The brightening is reckoned to be due to the two major stars of the system passing close by, with a period of 5.54 years; the fading is due to ejection of gas and dust from the system which obscures emissions from the stars.
Giant mouse lemur (nominated by Maky) The giant mouse lemur is a small and rare nocturnal primate, native to Madagascar, with cute ears, eyes, and a long, bushy tail. Both species are living in the forest. The animals weigh approximately 300 g (11 oz). Sadly, they are listed as endangered due to habitat destruction and hunting. As our article states: "In 2012, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assessed both Coquerel's giant mouse lemur and the northern giant mouse lemur as endangered." Sad news.
Halifax Explosion (nominated by Resolute and Nikkimaria) Early in the morning of 6 December 1917, two ships collided offshore of Halifax, Nova Scotia. Although the collision between a Norwegian cargo vessel, SS Imo, and the French vessel SS Mont-Blanc was minor, barrels of benzol stored on the deck of the Mont-Blanc were upset and breached, and the inflammable liquid poured out. As the Imo backed away from the Mont-Blanc, sparks from scraping metal ignited the vapours from the benzol, starting a fire at the waterline which quickly spread to the deck, producing thick black smoke. The crew took to the lifeboats and rowed as fast as they could away from the drifting Mont-Blanc, all the while shouting out warnings which remained unheard, such was the pandemonium. Many of the inhabitants of Halifax viewed the fire from their upstairs windows, and were killed or seriously injured when the ship exploded.
Hitler Diaries (nominated by SchroCat) The Hitler Diaries were 60 cheap notebooks in which memorabilia dealer Konrad Kujau faked what was purported to be a journal written by Adolf Hitler. They were accepted as such by journalist Gerd Heidemann who persuaded his employers at Stern to purchase them; additional verification was provided by British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper, who was told that the paper had been chemically tested and proven to be pre-war (it hadn't). Trevor-Roper was initially convinced by the range of supposed supporting documentation provided, and he wrote an article claiming they were genuine. This was published in The Sunday Times on 23 April 1983. By then he was already doubting their genuineness, and subsequent forensic testing showed their post-war origin.
Hu Zhengyan (nominated by Yunshui) Hu Zhengyan was a Chinese publisher, artist, and seal carver who lived in Nanjing from 1619 to 1674 CE. Here he established the Ten Bamboo Studio as a home, a meeting place for artists, and as the head office for his printing business. Hu employed ten artisans (including four family members) to publish reference works on a variety of subjects. He was a noted carver of personal seals, including ones for the emperor. Hu's usual artistic themes were bamboo, plum flowers, orchids, fruits, rocks, birds and animals. He also wrote books on calligraphy and painting.
JC's Girls (nominated by Neelix) JC's Girls, or "Jesus Christ's Girls", are an evangelical Christian women's organization in the United States. The JC's Girls evangelize to women working in the sex industry, and seek to help them in a non-judgmental way. The organization also helps both men and women to overcome pornography addiction.
Jeremy Thorpe (nominated by Brianboulton) British politician Jeremy Thorpe was leader of the UK Liberal Party between 1967 and 1976. Under his leadership, the Liberals gained or regained the support of many voters; in the first of two general elections held in 1974 the party received 19% of the vote. With neither of the two main parties (Labour and Conservative) having enough parliamentary seats to give them a clear majority, the Liberals were courted by the incumbent Conservatives to form a coalition government. Thorpe insisted that this proposed government have a commitment to electoral reform of the "first past the post" system.
Mary Margaret O'Reilly (nominated by Wehwalt) Mary Margaret O'Reilly was hired by the United States Bureau of the Mint as a temporary clerk in 1904. She was aged 38. By the time O'Reilly reached the mandatory retirement age of 70 she was assistant director of the Mint, with such an extensive knowledge of bureau affairs that she was granted a year's extension by President Roosevelt at the request of the Mint's director, Nellie Taylor Ross. O'Reilly was granted two further extensions, but a fourth extension lobbied for by Treasury Secretary Morgenthau was refused, and O'Reilly retired in October 1938.
Master of Puppets (nominated by Retrohead) Master of Puppets is the third album by the heavy metal band Metallica. Released in 1986, the album is regarded as a seminal album in the genre, and many cover versions of the "atmospheric and meticulously performed songs" have been recorded. It's also been credited with "consolidating the American thrash metal scene".
No. 450 Squadron RAAF (nominated by Ian Rose and AustralianRupert) No. 450 Squadron was a Royal Australian Air Force unit, established in February 1941. Initially it was staffed only with ground crew, who were to be joined by experienced pilots when the squadron had transferred to a theatre of active operations. No. 450 Squadron arrived in Egypt in May 1941, where it was combined with the pilots of No. 260 Squadron and their Hurricane fighters. The operational squadron, known as No. 260/450 (Hurricane), moved to Amman, Syria, in June 1941 where it flew missions to attack Vichy French airfields in Syria. This active phase lasted ten days; later in August the two squadrons were separated when No. 260 received its own ground crew—No. 450 became a training unit. By January 1942 the squadron had again become an active fighter unit, which served in the North African, Italian and Yugoslav campaigns, often in a ground attack role. It was disbanded in August 1945.
Nuckelavee (nominated by Eric Corbett and Sagaciousphil) The nuckelavee is the most horrible of the demons inhabiting the Scottish islands. When on land it appears as a horse-like creature with some human characteristics. The man's torso growing from its back has very long arms and a head as large as 3 feet (0.91 m) in diameter; some accounts say that the nuckelavee has two heads, one human the other equine. It has no skin, showing its black blood flowing through yellow veins. The nuckelavee's breath can wilt crops and sicken livestock, and it can only be controlled by the Mither o' the Sea, an Orcadian divine who keeps it confined during the summer months.
Stanley Price Weir (nominated by Peacemaker67) Stanley Price Weir (1866 – 1944) was an Australian Army officer who after his retirement became a public servant. Brigadier general Weir commanded the 10th Battalion of the Australian Imperial Force during the landing at Anzac Cove, the Gallipoli Campaign, World War I. For his efforts as a commander in the army, during these events and for participating in the Pozières and Battle of Mouquet Farm in France, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Order. He was actively contributing to several religious, charitable, and welfare organisations.
Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm (nominated by Iridescent) The painting is by English artist William Etty and owned by the Tate Gallery in London. It is one of Etty's best-known works. It was inspired by Thomas Gray's poem The Bard about the misrule of Richard II of England. The poem describes a gilded ship drifting on the sea, but the storm is near. The occupants are unaware of an approaching trouble, a moral warning about the pursuit of pleasure. The painting was not uncontroversial, as our article states: "the reaction of the lower classes to these paintings caused concern throughout the 19th century."

Fair laughs the morn, and soft the zephyr blows,

While proudly riding o'er the azure realm,

In gallant trim, the gilded vessel goes,

Youth on the prow and Pleasure at the helm,

Unmindful of the sweeping whirlwind's sway,

That, hushed in grim repose, expects his evening prey.

Featured lists

Lupita Nyongo got an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress
Tabu from the Featured list Tabu filmography
Francine Jordi, a featured picture

Audrey Hepburn on screen and stage, here in Sabrina.

Four featured lists were promoted this week.

Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress (nominated by Birdienest81) The Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress is an anual award distributed by the US Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences since in 1937. The first winner of this award was Gale Sondergaard who won this award for her role in Anthony Adverse. As our article states: "It is given in honor of an actress who has delivered an outstanding performance in a supporting role while working within the film industry."
Audrey Hepburn on screen and stage (nominated by Cowlibob) Audrey Hepburn was a British actress, and one of the most charming and enchanting actresses ever to appear on screen. She was regarded as "both a film and style icon." Hepburn's experiences of living in the Netherlands during the German occupation in the Second World War were the seed for her devotion to humanitarian work through UNICEF.
List of awards and nominations received by Adele (nominated by Another Believer and FrB.TG) Adele is an English singer-songwriter who has received 86 awards. The first awards were the BBC Sound of 2008 and Brit Awards for Critics' Choice. As our article states: "She is the recipient of a BT Digital Music Award, 4 Brit Awards, an Academy Award, a Golden Globe Award, 10 Grammy Awards, 13 Billboard Music Awards, and 4 American Music Awards. Her 2007 song "Hometown Glory" was nominated for a Grammy Award in the Best Female Pop Vocal Performance category. At the 51st Annual Grammy Awards, she earned the Best New Artist award, with two additional nominations at the same ceremony. The song "Someone like You" won three Grammy Awards, and "Set Fire to the Rain" won 54th and 55th Annual Grammy Awards, respectively. There are many more awards: Adele was awarded several other accolades, including the Echo Music Award and Grammy Award for Album of the Year, and won in 12 Billboard Music Award categories. In 2012, she released "Skyfall", a song of the 2012 James Bond film of the same name."

Tabu filmography (nominated by Krimuk90) Indian film actress Tabu's first role was played as teenager in Dev Anand's Hum Naujawan (1985). After some less well received films she went on to greater successes. As our article states: "Her most critically acclaimed performances were in the films Maachis (1996), Virasat (1997), Hu Tu Tu (1999), Astitva (2000), Chandni Bar (2001), Maqbool (2003), Cheeni Kum (2007), and Haider (2014)." She played the leading role in Mira Nair's drama The Namesake (2007) that got some positive reviews from American critics. She also had a role in Ang Lee's adventure film Life of Pi from (2012).

Florence Nightingale, the Lady with the Lamp; a featured picture
Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm, a featured article.
Maria I, Queen of Portugal by Giuseppe Troni, a featured picture.

Featured pictures

Twenty-eight Featured picturess were promoted this week.

Abraxas sylvata (created by Ivar Leidus; nominated by Alborzagros) This featured picture is a sharp and clear picture of Abraxas sylvata or clouded magpie moth. This insect is a colourful little nocturnal moth that lives on elm trees. It was named by the Tyrolean physician and naturalist Giovanni Antonio Scopoli in 1763. Scopoli corresponded regularly with Carl Linnaeus, and they discussed Scopoli's work and finds. Linnaeus named the plant genus Scopolia in his honor, as he often did with people he liked and respected. The plant is the source of scopolamine. So whenever you use a medicine with scopolamine (used against sea sickness) just think about our distinguished naturalist. It'll take your mind off the approaching iceberg.
Banknotes of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia: one koruna, five koruna from 1939 and from 1940, ten koruna, twenty koruna, fifty koruna from 1940 and from 1944, and one-hundred koruna. (created by National Bank for Bohemia and Moravia; nominated by Godot13) The Bohemian and Moravian koruna or the Protectorate crown was the currency of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia printed between 1939 and 1945, by the National Bank for Bohemia and Moravia in Prague. One koruna was worth 100 haléřů.
Cuban peso (created by Charles E. Barber; nominated by Godot13) The gold 5 Peso coin was struck at the Philadelphia Mint. The coin was engraved by Charles E. Barber, who was the Chief Engraver of the United States Mint. This particular coin depicts on the reverse the Coat of arms of Cuba and on the obverse José Martí, Cuban poet and national hero, who played a crucial role in the struggle for independence. At the Battle of Dos Rios he charged a strong Spanish position accompanied only by a young courier.
Kushari (created by User:Dinapriv; nominated by Crisco 1492) Kushari is a tasty vegetarian dish consisting of mixed rice, short pieces of spaghetti, and lentils with tomato sauce, garlic and vinegar, garnished with chickpeas and fried onions.
The Lady with the Lamp (created by Henrietta Rae; nominated by TomStar81) The Lady with the Lamp is a coloured lithograph reproduction made after a painting by Henrietta Rae from 1891. It depicts Florence Nightingale (1820 –1910), an iconic English nurse, also known as the "Lady with the Lamp", named after her habit of walking around checking on her patients during the night while she was a nurse in the Crimean war. Nightingale was a philosopher and a social reformer who is known as the founder of modern nursing. Nightingale established the first school to train nurses at St Thomas' Hospital in London. This is a very popular lithograph of Florence Nightingale. She was mentioned in a report in The Times:
She is a "ministering angel" without any exaggeration in these hospitals, and as her slender form glides quietly along each corridor, every poor fellow's face softens with gratitude at the sight of her. When all the medical officers have retired for the night and silence and darkness have settled down upon those miles of prostrate sick, she may be observed alone, with a little lamp in her hand, making her solitary rounds.
Francine Jordi (created by Tsui; nominated by Crisco 1492) Francine Jordi is a Swiss pop singer, one of the contemporary music stars of Switzerland. A favourite in the cuckoo-clock country, her performances of dubstep on the Alpenhorn are responsible for more than thirty avalanches a year.
Scene from La favorite (created by Émile Desmaisons after François-Gabriel Lépaulle; restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden) The Favorite (or La favorite) is a grand opera in four acts by the talented and fast Italian opera composer Gaetano Donizetti. The featured picture is a black and white lithograph by Émile Desmaisons (1812–1880) after Gabriel Lépaulle (1804–1886), that was used as a frontispiece to the first edition of the vocal score of the opera in Paris. The libretto is based on the play Le comte de Comminges by Baculard d'Arnaud, and it is about love, love, and love again, but no happy ending, alas. The premiere was in 1840 at the Paris Opera. It is said he wrote the whole opera in about three to four hours, what an inspiration for Signpost contributors.
Griffon vulture (created by User:Kookaburra 81; nominated by Pine) The Eurasian griffon or griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) is a large vulture living in the mountains in Europe, north Africa, and Asia. It has a white head and broad wings; brownish feathers, and short tail. The griffon vulture is a bird of prey, but it is usually just feeding on carcasses of dead animals.
Vocal score title page of Béatrice et Bénédict (created by Antoine Barbizet; restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden) Béatrice et Bénédict is an opéra comique in two acts by the French Romantic composer Hector Berlioz, known mostly for his Symphonie fantastique. This opera is based on Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing. The first edition of the title page of the vocal score is a featured picture.
He-gassen (created by Unknown artist; nominated by Bgwhite and Hafspajen) He-gassen, literally "Fart battle", is a Japanese art scroll showing men, women and cats in flatulence combat. The backfire rips a hole in a desk and causes people to fall off horses. The work was created in the Edo period by an unknown artist or artists. The noxious wind is supposed to be a metaphor for the xenophobia of the day.
NGC 1427A (created by NASA, ESA, and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA); nominated by Pine) The cosmic glitter of NGC 1427A is an irregular galaxy. This type of galaxy may have once been a spiral galaxy or elliptical galaxy which became disordered. NGC 1427A is situated in the constellation of Eridanus.
Kovalev versus Szilagyi (created by Jastrow; nominated by Alborzagros) The Hungarian fencer Áron Szilágyi is up against the Russian Nikolay Kovalev in the men's sabre semi-finals of the 2013 World Fencing Championships at Syma Hall in Hungary. Russia's Nikolay Kovalev (Kolya) won, but Áron Szilágyi got the bronze medal, anyway.
Lion of Al-lāt (created by User:Mappo; nominated by Brandmeister) There is no such lion. Not any more. The Lion of Al-lāt is demolished.
Maria I of Portugal (created by Giuseppe Troni; nominated by Crisco 1492) Maria I of Portugal (1734–1816) was the Queen of Portugal, and Kingdom of the Algarve. She was the first Queen regnant of Portugal. She moved later to the then-Portuguese colony of Brazil, where she was called "Maria the Mad". The painting was made by Giuseppe Troni (1739–1810), who was an Italian-born painter who became the Portuguese court painter of the Most Serene House of Braganza, the Portugese royal house.
Augustus Brine (created by John Singleton Copley; nominated by Crisco 1492) Augustus Brine (1769 – 1840), even if he looks rather young here, depicted as a young midshipman, he was definitely an officer of the Royal Navy. At this time he served on HMS Belliqueux, his father's ship. Augustus served during several big wars: in the American War of Independence, the French Revolutionary Wars, and in the Napoleonic Wars. He raised in rank thanks to good judgment and perseverance and was made a rear-admiral in 1837. John Singleton Copley, the American painter who worked in America and England, made this featured picture. Crisco discovered it, uploaded it, and nominated it. By the way, somebody should nominate that A Boy with a Flying Squirrel too, it's great. Free tip for anyone.
Lidder Valley (created by User:KennyOMG; nominated by Crisco 1492) The Lidder Valley is a beautiful valley in the state of Jammu and Kashmir in India. It was formed by the Lidder River. The valley is a somewhat dangerous pilgrimage route. The Hindu pilgrims use this road when on their annual Yatra pilgrimage to the Amarnath Temple shrine, considered a Hindu holy place. For the pilgrims, the journey itself has almost the same importance as the destination. The hardships encountered are regarded as an act of devotion themselves. This road was closed due to violent incidents for several years.
Aida at Masada, Isræl (created by Avinoam Michaeli ; nominated by Adam Cuerden) Aida is a world famous opera by Italian composer Giuseppe Verdi, here performed at The Israel Opera at Masada.
Ceiling of the Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome (created by Livioandronico2013; nominated by Adam Cuerden) Santa Maria della Vittoria is a spectacular Catholic church in Rome, with a fantastic ceiling... featured. This is the church where Gian Lorenzo Bernini's sculpture the Ecstasy of Saint Teresa is hosted. The church is dedicated to the Virgin Mary; the Italian name translates as Our Lady of Victory.
Tectarius coronatus (created by Llez; nominated by Crisco 1492) Tectarius coronatus or Beaded Prickly Winkle, is a sea snail, found in the Philippines and Celebes.
Old Woman Frying Eggs (created by Diego Velázquez; nominated by Crisco 1492) Old Woman Frying Eggs is a painting by the famous Spanish painter Diego Rodríguez de Silva y Velázquez, which is today on display in the National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh. It was painted during Velázquez' Seville period, when the artist produced quite a lot of genre paintings, depicting ordinary people and showing everyday life as it was when he lived. The paintings are often dark and shadowy, with bright luminous patches. This technique is called chiaroscuro; the artist depicts a single strong light source coming in from the left and illuminating the scene. The contrast of light and shadow highlights the figures and focus the interest of the viewer on certain details.
Ambroise Thomas (created by Wilhelm Benque; restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden) Ambroise Thomas (1811 –1896) was a French composer, pianist, and violinist, who served as director of the Conservatoire de Paris. He often used classical literary works as an inspiration in the composition of his operas. Several of his works are based on themes from Shakespeare and Dante. Ambroise Thomas's best known operas are Mignon (1866) and Hamlet. Emmanuel Chabrier who was also a French composer and pianist, said about him: "There is good music, there is bad music, and then there is Ambroise Thomas."

Reader comments

2015-08-12

Tech news in brief

Contribute —

Share this

By Wikimedia tech ambassadors

The following content has been republished as-is from the Tech News weekly report.

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

MediaWiki can now hide the signature button when you edit a content page. [1]

The "Your preferences have been saved" message has changed. You can now see more easily what was saved when you change preferences several times. [2]

You can now play Ogg video files in some browsers that don't support this format. This solution uses JavaScript and works on desktop browsers only for now. It will work on mobile later. [3]

You can now use the same tools to edit style in VisualEditor on mobile as in desktop browsers. [4]

It is now easier to see if there is a JavaScript error in a user or site script. [5]

JavaScript authors:

You can no longer use the Sajax library. You can see a list of pages to fix. [6] [7]

You can no longer use document.write on Wikimedia wikis. You can see a list of pages to fix. [8] [9]

The content translation tool now works better. It is easier to use math, and useless tags are no longer added. [10]

Problems

More edits have been rejected due to loss of session data lately. This is now fixed. [11]

Importing a Lua module sometimes didn't work. This is now fixed. [12]

Text was sometimes lost in the content translation tool. One part of the problem is now fixed. [13]

Changes this week

The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from August 11. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from August 12. It will be on all Wikipedias from August 13 (calendar).

UploadWizard is getting a new look. The look of buttons and checkboxes has already changed. This week, UploadWizard gets a new date picker. The other text fields will change soon. [14]

You can now test VisualEditor on mobile devices of all sizes. [15]

Meetings

You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on August 11 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Some things in the watchlist will get a new look. [16]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reader comments

2015-08-12

The Hunt for Tirpitz

Contribute —

Share this

By Nick-D

The following content has been republished from the Wikimedia Blog. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author alone; responses and critical commentary are invited in the comments section. For more information on this partnership see our content guidelines.

[[File:|800px|left|]]

The German battleship Tirpitz shortly before being launched into the sea. Upon entering service in 1941, it was one of the largest and most modern battleships in the world.

During World War II, the German battleship Tirpitz was a major threat to Allied convoys travelling across the North Atlantic and Arctic Sea to the Soviet Union. Tirpitz was one of the largest and most modern battleships afloat, and the massive effort which was required to find and sink its sister ship Bismarck in May 1941 convinced the Allies that it needed to be destroyed. This proved very difficult, however, as from 1942 Tirpitz was stationed in well-protected bases in Norwegian fjords.

During 1942 and 1944, the British repeatedly attempted to attack Tirpitz at its bases. Several raids by land-based bombers flying from the UK were unsuccessful, and an attempt to attack with manned torpedoes failed at the last moment due to technical problems. The task of attacking Tirpitz became even harder once it was moved to Kaafjord in the remote far north of Norway, but in September 1943 a raid conducted by British midget submarines (Operation Source) inflicted heavy damage. However, it survived this attack, and the British decided that the next-best option was to attack it with the Fleet Air Arm, using aircraft flying from aircraft carriers.

British Barracuda aircraft flying over a fjord shortly before attacking Tirpitz during Operation Tungsten on 3 April 1944.

This led to a series of operations between April and August 1944, of which only the first—Operation Tungsten—inflicted any significant damage. Mascot was much less successful, and involved a somewhat farcical attack in which the British pilots attempted to drop bombs on the ship by aiming at flashes from Tirpitz‘s guns through a thick German-laid smokescreen. Goodwood involved four separate raids over a week in August, but once again ended in failure due to smokescreens over the battleship during each of the attacks. Despite the lack of results, each of these attacks was a major battle involving thousands of personnel on both sides.

Inspirations

Over the last two years I’ve developed three featured-class articles about these unsuccessful attacks, but how did an Australian end up writing about little-known events which took place in the far north of Norway 70 years ago and involved very few Australians?

Ironically, my main inspiration for writing about this topic came from a museum located even further away from Norway—when visiting the Museum of Transport and Technology in Auckland, New Zealand, I was surprised to learn that New Zealanders made up a large proportion of the FAA’s aircrew during World War II (about 17% of the airmen involved in Operation Tungsten were from the country). The museum’s dramatic diorama depicting British Fairey Barracuda aircraft dive-bombing Tirpitz in a fjord interested me as well; I’d written articles on other little-known carrier aircraft attacks on important naval bases (like the Attack on Yokosuka) and World War II in Norway (Black Friday [1945] and Action of 28 January 1945), and recently reviewed a book about the British attacks on Tirpitz.

When combined, this looked like a topic I’d want to work on, and my initial research confirmed this. The series of British raids were major efforts which involved the bulk of the Home Fleet (the Royal Navy’s main combat force, stationed in the UK) and exposed the airmen to extreme danger from the hostile Norwegian climate and formidable German defences. Moreover, despite the British forces being considerably more powerful than the German units stationed at Kaafjord, they were unable to do much damage due to the limitations of the fleet’s aircraft, bad weather, and some ingenious German tactics.

Deeper research turned up more fascinating facts—for instance, the US Navy transferred an aircraft carrier from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean to allow Operation Tungsten to go ahead, and one of the Royal Navy’s carriers was so worn out it was withdrawn from service and retired halfway through Operation Goodwood!

My kingdom for a (comprehensive) source!

[[File:|800px|left|]]

Royal Navy crewman Bob Cotcher used chalk to write a message on a 1,600 pound (730 kg) bomb earmarked for Tirpitz.

My main challenge in writing these articles was the absence of a single source which covers all of the attacks in detail. While there are several histories which cover all the Allied attacks on Tirpitz, the amount of information they provide on each of the operations varies considerably. For instance, Mark Bishop’s recent book Target Tirpitz only goes into detail on Operation Tungsten and skims over the other attacks, and John Sweetman’s Tirpitz: Hunting the Beast is very useful for Operations Tungsten and (to a lesser extent) Goodwood, but only briefly mentions Operation Mascot. Stephen Roskill’s venerable official history of the Royal Navy in World War II also provided a useful overview of the attacks and the strategy which guided them, but was weak on the details of the individual operations.

As a result, developing these articles to FA standard was only possible by consulting many specialised sources. I’m fortunate to live in a city boasting several libraries with excellent military history collections, and I trawled their shelves on weekends. This really paid off—for instance, the Operation Mascot article probably couldn’t have come together without V.E. Tarrant’s rather obscure The Last Year of the Kriegsmarine, which provided the only detailed account of this attack I could find. Similarly, specialised works on battleships, naval aviation, and the naval war in the Arctic allowed me to fill in important details. Given the importance of these obscure works, I suspect that there are only a smallish number cities in the world—and possibly no other city in Australia—where it might have been possible for an amateur historian like me to develop articles on this topic without resorting to inter-library loans and/or expensive purchases.

Something that surprised me was the value of the British official history British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations, which was published during the 1980s and 1990s, in developing the articles. By assessing British wartime intelligence reports against what actually occurred, this work provided an important reality check at several points, and was particularly valuable when using sources which pre-dated the disclosure of the Allied success in breaking the German codes in the late 1970s. As a bonus, its authors had a good eye for interesting snippets about the military operations against Tirpitz which allowed me to inject some extra “colour” into the articles. This experience illustrated the value of reading widely around the topic, and I’d strongly recommend consulting this work when writing articles on World War II in Europe.

Despite these positive experiences, I wasn’t able to fill in some significant details in the articles. Most importantly, no source went into detail on the German experiences of the operations, with the available coverage generally being focused on Tirpitz and its crew. As a result, I couldn’t pin down the strength of the German anti-aircraft and air force units deployed to protect Tirpitz, or the casualties they sustained—which appear to have been heavy in several of the attacks. Second, while this part of Norway is sparsely populated, it would also have been good to have described the experiences of local civilians. Finally, while various unreliable or semi-reliable sources discussed commemorations of the raids, it was very difficult to source material on them to featured article standard.

Writing the articles, and some reflections

Part of the cost of war: one of Manxruler’s photos of the Commonwealth War Graves section of Tromsø’s main cemetery, where several of the Allied airmen who were killed in the raids on Tirpitz are buried.

I developed the three articles in their chronological order, starting by improving the already-existent Operation Tungsten article and ending by creating and developing an article on Operation Goodwood. This worked well, as I was able to re-use text and references in each successive article. I also adjusted the level of detail on the background and aftermath of the operations as appropriate—Operation Tungsten has detailed coverage of the background to these attacks, Operation Mascot discusses the several abortive raids which followed Tungsten in April and May 1944, and Operation Goodwood goes into greater detail on the successful attacks by land-based Royal Air Force bombers which followed the Royal Navy’s failure to seriously damage Tirpitz. To improve readers’ ability to navigate this topic, I also created a List of Allied attacks on the German battleship Tirpitz article which provides a summary of the various operations.

A Universal Newsreel in 1944 led with the sinking of Tirpitz, which after the failures of Tungsten, Mascot, and Goodwind, was eventually accomplished by the Royal Air Force.

The process of submitting each of the articles to Good Article, A-class and featured reviews also helped guide their development. The feedback from reviewers highlighted areas I needed to pay close attention to which were common to all articles, such as the need to ensure that the terminology used was suitable for readers who don’t have prior knowledge of the broad topic areas the articles cover. I also found that I could revisit the older articles as I went along and found new sources or useful facts I’d missed, with the happy result that the Tungsten and Mascot articles are—hopefully—in better shape than when they passed their featured article nominations!

I’d also like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of Manxruler, a Norwegian local and Wikipedia editor, who took photos of the graves of Allied airmen at the Commonwealth War Graves Cemetery in Tromsø and added some additional details to the text. This illustrated the power of Wikipedia to connect interested editors in different parts of the world to work towards a common cause.

Overall, I’d recommend the experience of writing a string of articles on related topics, and now understand why some editors tend to use this as their main editing style. It’s an efficient way to produce high-quality articles, and provides a great opportunity to write about a topic in detail. While I was worried about getting bored with the topic or burnt out, the small number of articles, fairly self-contained nature of the individual battles and the sheer novelty of the topic (aircraft carriers attacking a battleship in a fjord!) kept me interested, and I was pleased with the positive response from reviewers, which suggests that other editors also found the topic worthwhile.

I was also very pleased that Operation Tungsten appeared on Wikipedia’s front page to mark the 70th anniversary of the raid on 3 April 2014, which went a long way to making the whole project worthwhile.

This post was originally published in the Bugle, the monthly newsletter of the English Wikipedia's Military history WikiProject. It was edited and expanded for publication on the Wikimedia Blog and in the Signpost.

Reader comments

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.

It's your Signpost. You can help us.

Home

About