Oh, huh, so it is - it's one I've been slowly working away at for a while but since it still has the stub tag on the article itself (and no description section) I assumed it was still stub-class. I was in the process of writing a description as I saw this ping, so I'll go ahead and finish it, but feel free to remove it from the drive and I'll just stick to Frullania polysticta for the moment. Cheers for catching that :) Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 02:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! And I didn't even check for the stub tag on the article page. Yeah you can just finish your changes and remove the stub template when ready. Sorry about that! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to change the talk page back to stub. When you are finished, you can do the step in the talk page to change it to start. It's a larger than normal stub, but still a stub. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 02:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, I've just gone and published a basic description and removed the stub tag, so I'll go ahead and switch the talk rating back to Start in a moment. I'm happy to not count this article for the purpose of the drive, as it's a bit of a borderline case, but I'll leave it to your judgement. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 02:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
