Category:Stub-Class Skiing and Snowboarding articles
Appearance
Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Template | NA | ??? |
1 | 0 | 38 | 59 | 323 | 2,120 | 6,197 | 2 | 522 | 2,339 | 5 | 5 | 652 | 0 | 6 | 677 | 143 | 1,350 |
- Project home - WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Skiing and Snowboarding articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Pages in category "Stub-Class Skiing and Snowboarding articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 6,197 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)P
- Talk:Martín Pearson
- Talk:Marjan Pečar
- Talk:Jan Pechoušek
- Talk:Karin Peckert-Forsman
- Talk:Matteo Pedergnana
- Talk:Glynn Pedersen
- Talk:Isak Stianson Pedersen
- Talk:Jesper Pedersen (alpine skier)
- Talk:Nicola Pederzolli
- Talk:Aldo Pedrana
- Talk:Roberta Pedranzini
- Talk:Daniele Pedrini
- Talk:Italo Pedroncelli
- Talk:Peek'n Peak
- Talk:Mattia Pegorari
- Talk:Killian Peier
- Talk:Ann-Marie Pelchat
- Talk:Perrine Pelen
- Talk:Federico Pelizzari
- Talk:Pentti Pelkonen
- Talk:Patrice Pellat-Finet
- Talk:Anna Pellissier
- Talk:Gloriana Pellissier
- Talk:Fritz Pellkofer
- Talk:Peltonen (company)
- Talk:Mel Pemble
- Talk:Peter Pen
- Talk:Aleksandr Penigin
- Talk:Alexander Penna
- Talk:Luigi Pennacchio
- Talk:Juku Pent
- Talk:Teodora Pentcheva
- Talk:Olli Penttala
- Talk:Petri Penttinen
- Talk:Yosyf Penyak
- Talk:Alain Penz
- Talk:Melissa Peperkamp
- Talk:Laure Pequegnot
- Talk:Alan Perathoner
- Talk:Emanuel Perathoner
- Talk:Lukas Perathoner
- Talk:Julia Pereira de Sousa Mabileau
- Talk:Mafalda Pereira
- Talk:Bibiana Perez
- Talk:Perfect North Slopes
- Talk:Guy Périllat
- Talk:Enzo Perin
- Talk:Václav Peřina
- Talk:Roman Perko
- Talk:Carlos Perner
- Talk:Gottlieb Perren
- Talk:Bernard Perret
- Talk:Francis Perret
- Talk:Jacques Perreten
- Talk:Ivan Perrillat Boiteux
- Talk:Aurélie Perrillat-Collomb Storti
- Talk:Auguste Perrin
- Talk:Claude Perrot
- Talk:Olesya Persidskaya
- Talk:Anton Persson (skier)
- Talk:Bertil Persson (alpine skier)
- Talk:Leif Persson
- Talk:Karen Persyn
- Talk:Zoran Perušina
- Talk:Anastasiia Pervushina
- Talk:Luca Pesando
- Talk:Alessandra Pescosta
- Talk:Maryna Pestryakova
- Talk:Jacques Peten
- Talk:Martina Peterlini
- Talk:Aleksander Peternel
- Talk:Kye Petersen
- Talk:Doug Peterson (cross-country skier)
- Talk:Sydney Peterson
- Talk:Dimitri Petrov (cross-country skier)
- Talk:Nikolay Petrushin
- Talk:Sigurd Pettersen
- Talk:Alexey Petukhov
- Talk:Sharon Petzold
- Talk:Lara Peyrot
- Talk:Gerhard Pfaffenbichler
- Talk:Hady Pfeiffer
- Talk:Christian Pfeuti
- Talk:Meike Pfister
- Talk:Brittany Phelan
- Talk:Philippine Ski and Snowboard Federation
- Talk:Christine Phillip
- Talk:Harper Phillips
- Talk:Phoenix Mountain Ski Resort
- Talk:Phoenix Pyeongchang
- Talk:Piao Dongyi
- Talk:Bruno Piazzalunga
- Talk:Fabrice Piazzini
- Talk:Silvia Piccagnoni
- Talk:Ian Piccard
- Talk:Leila Piccard
- Talk:Walter Pichler (biathlete)
- Talk:Wolfgang Pichler
- Talk:Maksim Pichugin (skier)
- Talk:Walter Pick
- Talk:Pico Mountain
- Talk:Elina Pienimäki-Hietamäki
- Talk:Giacomo Pierbon
- Talk:Hans Pieren
- Talk:Pieris Pieri
- Talk:Claude Pierrat
- Talk:Victor Pierrel
- Talk:Zeke Piestrup
- Talk:Sami Pietilä
- Talk:Tino Pietrogiovanna
- Talk:Manuel Pietropoli
- Talk:Han Hendrik Piho
- Talk:Kail Piho
- Talk:Petja Piiroinen
- Talk:Tambet Pikkor
- Talk:Edgars Piksons
- Talk:Pila, Aosta Valley
- Talk:Andreas Pilavakis (alpine skier)
- Talk:Marina Piller
- Talk:Sergio Piller
- Talk:Evelyn Pinching
- Talk:Simone Pinzani
- Talk:Andrzej Piotrowski (skier)
- Talk:Giannos Pipis
- Talk:Yelena Piraynen
- Talk:Roger Pires
- Talk:József Piroska
- Talk:Kathy Pitcher
- Talk:Geoff Pitchford
- Talk:Pivot turn (skiing)
- Talk:Debora Pixner
- Talk:François Place
- Talk:Glen Plake
- Talk:Vyacheslav Plaksunov
- Talk:Planai
- Talk:Planica7
- Talk:Jolanda Plank
- Talk:Iskren Plankov
- Talk:Didier Plaschy
- Talk:Christophe Plé
- Talk:Pleasant Mountain Ski Area
- Talk:Julia Pleshkova
- Talk:Janez Pleteršek
- Talk:Max Ploetzeneder
- Talk:Jan Płonka
- Talk:Roberts Plūme
- Talk:Pocol
- Talk:Władysław Podgórski
- Talk:Khrystyna Podrushna
- Talk:Michael Poettoz
- Talk:Ralph Pöhland
- Talk:Gervais Poirot
- Talk:Gilbert Poirot
- Talk:Philippe Poirot
- Talk:Stanislav Pokhilko
- Talk:Viktor Polášek
- Talk:Danielle Poleschuk
- Talk:Josef Polig
- Talk:Juan Poll
- Talk:Eric Pollard (skier)
- Talk:Joffrey Pollet-Villard
- Talk:Alexey Poltoranin
- Talk:Nikolay Polukhin
- Talk:Maxim Polunin
- Talk:Irina Polyakova
- Talk:Dino Pompanin
- Talk:Josef Ponn
- Talk:Kathy Poohachof
- Talk:Katarzyna Popieluch
- Talk:Lyubomir Popov
- Talk:Mykola Popovych
- Talk:Evy Poppe
- Talk:Porcupine Mountains Ski Area
- Talk:Piret Pormeister
- Talk:Miguel Porteous
- Talk:Kristean Porter
- Talk:Terry Porter (cross-country skier)
- Talk:Patricia Portillo
- Talk:Tomáš Portyk
- Talk:Marion Posch
- Talk:Josef Pospíšil
- Talk:Lorenz Possa
- Talk:Sandy Poulsen
- Talk:Claire de Pourtales
- Talk:Caroline Poussier
- Talk:Édouard Pouteil-Noble
- Talk:Tanja Poutiainen
- Talk:Powder surfing
- Talk:Powderhouse Hill (ski area)
- Talk:Stefano Pozzolini
- Talk:Paola Pozzoni
- Talk:Diego Prado
- Talk:Candide Pralong
- Talk:Roger Pramotton
- Talk:Janno Prants
- Talk:Évariste Prat
- Talk:Francisco Prat
- Talk:Miguel Prat
- Talk:Baldur Preiml
- Talk:Alejandro Preinfalk