Category:Stub-Class Skiing and Snowboarding articles
Appearance
Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Template | NA | ??? |
1 | 0 | 38 | 59 | 323 | 2,120 | 6,197 | 2 | 522 | 2,339 | 5 | 5 | 652 | 0 | 6 | 677 | 143 | 1,350 |
- Project home - WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Skiing and Snowboarding articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Pages in category "Stub-Class Skiing and Snowboarding articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 6,197 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)Q
R
- Talk:Richard Rabasa
- Talk:Rabbit Hill Snow Resort
- Talk:Urška Rabič
- Talk:Judy Rabinowitz
- Talk:Roman Rabl
- Talk:Antonio Rački
- Talk:Alexis Racloz
- Talk:Taras Rad
- Talk:River Radamus
- Talk:Ariane Rädler
- Talk:Nadezhda Radovitskaya
- Talk:Armen Rafayelyan
- Talk:Nicolas Raffort
- Talk:Andri Ragettli
- Talk:Michel Rahme
- Talk:Farida Rahmeh
- Talk:Dick Rahoi
- Talk:Kishor Rahtna Rai
- Talk:Carina Raich
- Talk:Federico Raimo
- Talk:Roberts Raimo
- Talk:Philipp Raimund
- Talk:Willy Raine
- Talk:Niklas Rainer
- Talk:Henna Raita
- Talk:Erkki Rajala
- Talk:Jukka Rajala
- Talk:Dmitry Rak
- Talk:Vanesa Rakedzhyan
- Talk:Yuliya Rakovich
- Talk:Sophia Ralli
- Talk:Aliaksandra Ramanouskaya
- Talk:Katharina Ramsauer
- Talk:Carmen Ranigler
- Talk:Raido Ränkel
- Talk:Seppo Rantanen
- Talk:Ivan Rantchev
- Talk:Matilda Rapaport
- Talk:Veikko Räsänen
- Talk:Jan Raszka
- Talk:Mojca Rataj
- Talk:Euretta de Cosson Rathbone
- Talk:Julian Rauchfuß
- Talk:Elisabeth Raudaschl
- Talk:Pavo Raudsepp
- Talk:Max Rauffer
- Talk:Raukleiv
- Talk:Gabriele Rauscher
- Talk:Kirsi Rautava
- Talk:Bernadette Rauter
- Talk:Maria Rautio
- Talk:Eero Rautiola
- Talk:Jenny Rautionaho
- Talk:Gilbert Ravanel
- Talk:Miran Rauter
- Talk:Andrew Rawlin
- Talk:Lyaysan Rayanova
- Talk:Tone Razinger
- Talk:Jana Rázlová
- Talk:Natalia Razumovskaya
- Talk:Jim Read (alpine skier)
- Talk:John Read (skier)
- Talk:Real Skifi
- Talk:Sami Rebez
- Talk:Red Lodge Mountain
- Talk:Red Mountain (Rossland)
- Talk:Valerii Redkozubov
- Talk:David Rees (British cross-country skier)
- Talk:Cédric Regnier-Lafforgue
- Talk:Julien Regnier-Lafforgue
- Talk:Alfredo Rego
- Talk:Márta Vastagh Regős
- Talk:Aivar Rehemaa
- Talk:Josef Rehm
- Talk:Rehns BK
- Talk:Franz-Josef Rehrl
- Talk:Rosemarie Reichenbach
- Talk:Ossi Reichert
- Talk:Anne Reid (skier)
- Talk:Robert Reid (cross-country skier)
- Talk:Seppo Reijonen
- Talk:Agnes Reisch
- Talk:Livia Reit
- Talk:Mario Reiter
- Talk:Philipp Reiter
- Talk:Reiteralm (Styria)
- Talk:Mara Rekar
- Talk:Anders Rekdal
- Talk:Thedo Remmelink
- Talk:Zdeněk Remsa
- Talk:Vangansürengiin Renchinkhorol
- Talk:Franz Renggli
- Talk:Herbert Renoth
- Talk:František Repka
- Talk:Juhani Repo
- Talk:Ihor Reptyukh
- Talk:Resmi Resmiev
- Talk:Resorts of the Canadian Rockies (company)
- Talk:Stefan Rettenegger
- Talk:Fernando Reutter
- Talk:Aurélie Revillet
- Talk:Anne-Flore Rey
- Talk:Denis Rey
- Talk:Michel Rey
- Talk:René Rey
- Talk:Boris Režek
- Talk:William Rhoads
- Talk:Ri Han-soon
- Talk:Ri Kyong-hui
- Talk:Ri Yong-gum
- Talk:Pavel Ryabinin
- Talk:Jordi Ribó
- Talk:Emma Ribom
- Talk:Aluan Ricciardi
- Talk:Yvan Richard
- Talk:Richardson Viano
- Talk:Per-Olov Richardsson
- Talk:Mike Riddle
- Talk:Sergey Ridzik
- Talk:Anna-Maria Rieder
- Talk:Josl Rieder
- Talk:Georg Riedlsperger
- Talk:Günther Rieger
- Talk:Rudolf Rieger
- Talk:Claudia Riegler (skier)
- Talk:Manuela Riegler
- Talk:Michael Riegler
- Talk:Alberts Riekstiņš
- Talk:Karolina Riemen
- Talk:Susi Riermeier
- Talk:Susanne Riesch
- Talk:Sergio Rigoni
- Talk:Miha Rihtar
- Talk:Jarl Magnus Riiber
- Talk:Kristina Riis-Johannessen
- Talk:Christian Rijavec
- Talk:Silvia del Rincón
- Talk:Abby Ringquist
- Talk:Kelly Ringstad
- Talk:Sandra Ringwald
- Talk:Rene Rinnekangas
- Talk:Jim Rippey
- Talk:Melcher Risberg
- Talk:Konstantin Ritter
- Talk:Jörg Ritzerfeld
- Talk:Pia Riva
- Talk:Javier Rivara
- Talk:José Rivera (ski jumper)
- Talk:Igino Rizzi
- Talk:Henrik Røa
- Talk:Štefan Robač
- Talk:Julien Robert
- Talk:Alessandro Roberto
- Talk:Michael Robertson (skier)
- Talk:Darrell Robison
- Talk:Mateja Robnik
- Talk:Emma Roca Rodríguez
- Talk:Alfred Roch
- Talk:Conrad Rochat
- Talk:Roland Roche
- Talk:Nina Rocheva
- Talk:Olivier Rochon
- Talk:Stéphane Rochon
- Talk:Rocky Mountain Intercollegiate Ski Association
- Talk:Sally Rodd
- Talk:Roberts Rode
- Talk:Enno Röder
- Talk:Olena Rodina
- Talk:Titti Rodling
- Talk:Jorge Rodríguez (alpine skier)
- Talk:Sophie Rodriguez
- Talk:Diann Roffe
- Talk:Rok Rogelj
- Talk:Stefan Rogentin
- Talk:Michèle Rohrbach
- Talk:Fabien Rohrer
- Talk:Peter Rohwein
- Talk:Renate Roider
- Talk:Mons Røisland
- Talk:Andrzej Gąsienica Roj
- Talk:José Rojas (skier)
- Talk:Olle Rolén
- Talk:Kevin Rolland
- Talk:Patrick Rölli
- Talk:Per Rollum
- Talk:Dagmar Rom
- Talk:Freddy Romano
- Talk:Giuseppe Romele
- Talk:Bjørn Einar Romøren
- Talk:Adrián Roncallo
- Talk:Mikko Ronkainen