Talk:C Sharp 4.0

Computing: Software / CompSci Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Microsoft: .NET

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject .NET (assessed as Mid-importance).

Why so much COM

Why does this page have so much of an emphasis on COM? There is a large community of C# developers that have nothing to do with COM. COM might be useful for explaning motivation, but the reliance on COM to describe C# functionality seems unnecessarily confusing. For example, I've been using C# for 8 years and do not recall ever seeing any reference to COM in the C# spec (although there could be a few). - ATBS 14Aug09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.25.123 (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Optional ref Keyword when using COM

Should the example `int x = 0;Increment(ref x);` have the ref in it? It seems to be the opposite of what's stated in the description. Db26 (talk) 01:54, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Covariance and contravariance

This section is identical to the same section in the C# Syntax page.
See its talk page for a discussion on recommended improvements that could also apply to the section here.

-- Forbin1 (talk) 19:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed vs Default Optional Parameter

I've not yet worked with C# 4.0, nor do I have ready access to a compiler for it, but why would "void Increment(ref int x, int dx = 1){} Increment(ref x, 2);" cause dx to take a value of 3? Wouldn't dx take the passed value of 2? Some explanation would help here. Macavity (talk) 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:C Sharp (programming language) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]