Talk:Géza Anda

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

fading reputation

you write: "But since his death in 1976 at the age of fifty-four his high reputation has faded somewhat from view."

Be carefull with a view, which might be true only form the point of view of a far-away-province!

Geza Anda is today, with all the interpretations documented on CD, far away from a "somewhat fading out reputation", but simply considered as one of the very important CREATORS of Interpretations of European Music.

rainer boesch

Shame this great artist has such a shoddy Wikepedia page. Can I amend it,with,for instance, Gramaphone reviews of his recordings? His Bartok and Mozart recordings are cannon, like Brendel's Schubert, Gilel's Brahms concerti and Kleiber's Beethoven Symphonies. --RainerBoesch 11:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Murphy

I also find this subjective comment, meaningless on close analysis, serves only as padding in the introduction. I feel strongly this sentence should be deleted as forming a partial and subjective view not fit for purpose in a Wikipedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.166.134 (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

The 08:03, 11 May 2010 Clover999 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing stub.--Wing (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported claims - citations needed

"considered to be a tremendous interpreter of Beethoven, Schumann, Brahms and Bartók." "In his heyday he was regarded as an amazing artist, possessed of a beautiful, natural and flawless technique that gave his concerts a unique quality." May well be true, after listening to him a little, but need attributions for these claims. Michaelmross (talk) 11:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]