User:Clh1806/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of Clh1806. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Motivating Employees to Follow a Hearing Conservation Program
[edit]Even with training and education, the workers need to be motivated to use hearing protection on a regular basis for the hearing conservation program to be successful[1]. Even if workers are aware that noise can cause hearing loss, that does not guarantee that they will take the necessary actions to preserve their hearing[1].
There are several reasons why a worker may choose not to adopt the protocols of a hearing conservation program. Employees may not follow protocol because they feel that noise induced hearing loss will not happen to them[1]. They may believe this because they think the level of sound that they are exposed is not loud enough to cause hearing loss or that loud noise just toughens their ears. They might also think hearing loss is not a serious condition and can easily be fixed with hearing aids[1]. Another reason is the worker may believe that hearing protection does not actually work and that he/she may still develop noise-induced hearing loss even with hearing protection[1]. If the employee feels that hearing protection may impinge his/her work, whether it be missing important warning signals or the ability to communicate, he/she is less likely to wear it[1]. Finally, the comfort of the hearing protection offered through the hearing conservation program[2]. If the hearing protection is uncomfortable, it is unlikely that the worker will adhere to the policies[2].
Motivational techniques can be implemented to promote hearing conservation program compliance and the use of hearing protection. One suggestion is continued education at the workers' audiometric screening[2]. They should be asked to bring along their current hearing protection device to the screening. If the results are normal and the inspection of the hearing protection device is good, praise can be given for following protocol. If there is a shift in their hearing, instruction can be given again about the proper use of hearing protection and the importance of wearing them. Audiograms can be very useful in showing workers how noise can affect their hearing. One specific way to do this is to perform two hearing test on an employee on two different days[2]. One day the hearing test will be after wearing hearing protection all day and the other will be after not wearing hearing protection for the day. The difference can then be discussed with the worker and he/she has a tangible way to see how noise affects hearing. Another technique is using "internal triggers" to motivate employees to comply to the hearing conservation program[1]. If the individual already suffers from tinnitus and/or hearing loss they are probably more likely to use hearing protection because he/she does not want that problem to progress with noise exposure. Finally, the hearing protection offered should be comfortable so the worker will wear it. It is suggested that workers have a variety of hearing protection devices available to them, including at least one type of earmuff and two different forms of earplugs, to fit the individual needs and wants of the workers[2].
Ω The final tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.
- ^ a b c d e f g Rawool, Vishakha (2012). Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. pp. 174–185. ISBN 978-1-60406-256-4.
- ^ a b c d e Berger, Elliot (1981). Motivating employees to wear hearing protection devices. EARlog 7. Aearo Company: Indianopolis, IN.