User talk:Bonadea/Archive 16

November 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Viewmont Viking, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 10:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion

User:Excelsior Educational & Development This page was created to make awareness in people. Everything in this page is written according to the rules if Wikipedia. If you find anything promotional please highlight that so that we can change it.

Selecting it for deletion is not an appropriate thing to do. Excelsior Educational & Development (talk) 07:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Problem gambling -> Spam

Thank's, i´ve changed the referenced info for a good referenced site--Euroescritor (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Pozzitive DHM/ "Strap In - It's Clever Peter"

Thank you for your message; my mistake, yes! I first logged in as myself, the DHM one, and then only afterwards realized that there was an existing company login which my old assistant had set up, the Pozzitive one (which is indeed my production company). So from now on, everything I do will be as the Pozzitive one. Sorry about that!

david Pozzitive (talk) 13:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Gambling category & Problem gambling

Hi Bona, I would like to comment about the relationship between Gambling and Problem gambling, you've edited back my edition with this comment "rm good-faith edit: gambling is not per definition problem gambling, so it is not an appropriate category) ". I think there's a strong relationship, it's been talked earlier about on board, but it was not conclusive. I believe we should bring the subject back, because I think there's an substantial relationship.--Euroescritor (talk) 20:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)oo

Userboxen

Please assume good faith on my part and my desire to improve the encyclopedia. I am actually relieved that you at least considered my message to you to be a joke - though it was not. I would have been quite distressed if you had been insulted or offended and I am glad weren't affected in those ways. Also, your jovial attitude, expressed in a light-hearted manner should result in our continued discussions.

WP:Userboxes describes the term typically used, by consensus, in place of the word 'Userboxen' Of course, and without a doubt, the term userboxen can be used on your own talk page.

And though my message to you has been deleted (why?) at least it was visible for a couple of hours.

Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  09:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

What does my use of an unorthodox plural form, as a joke on my user page, have to do with anything? Is that the reason you told me my English is not good enough for Wikipedia? (Actually, don't answer that.) For the record, it is not quite correct to say that regular plural forms are used by consensus (but that is a side issue.) Concerning the message of yours that I removed, if it was not a joke, I am afraid it can only be interpreted as a wholly uncalled-for slur and insult. However, I am not offended, since you don't actually know me, and your opinion is based on a small sample of my activities. It is an unpleasant thing to know that I am being seen as unhelpful and incompetent, but I don't think that is a majority opinion, since I haven't heard it from anybody else here. You are certainly entitled to that opinion, but hopefully my presence won't present a problem for you in the future. After all, we have been active Wikipedians for years without crossing paths. I am sure we won't have any problems being civil to each other if we should find ourselves editing the same articles. --bonadea contributions talk 21:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)