User talk:Aliasghar ghorbandokht

Welcome!

Hello, Aliasghar ghorbandokht, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hazhar Saleh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ahmetlii (talk) 19:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazhar Saleh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hazhar Saleh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahmetlii (talk) 19:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete Hezhar Saleh article? All the claims have solid sources and he is a very famous singer Please delete it instead Correct it Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazhar Saleh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hazhar Saleh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blablubbs|talk 19:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hazhar Saleh article

I understand wanting to create a new article. But the article you created was previously deleted and moved to Draft:Hazhar Saleh, where it was rejected from becoming an article because of problems with how it was written. It looks like you copy and pasted the same article that was written there (which is usually frowned upon on Wikipedia, since some would consider it "gaming the system"). The article still has the same issues as before, which is why it was tagged for deletion.

Also, are you the same user as the one who created Draft:Hazhar Saleh - User:Hazhar saleh? If you are, then you need to know that Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow editing with multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm edit draft: Hazhar Saleh and fix type And I'm not creator I urge you to correct and protect the shortcomings of the article Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I can't personally correct the shortcomings of the article (I'm a volunteer editor, just like you, and I'm unfamiliar with the topic Hazhar Saleh). But you are welcome to try to correct them by editing Draft:Hazhar Saleh.

The main problems on the draft are that: 1.) It needs to be re-written, since it sounds promotional as it is now, and 2.) there are not enough reliable sources in the article. A "reliable" source usually means the source needs to have a reputation for fact-checking, and it should be written by an independent person, or someone not related to Saleh in any way (for example, a news article is usually reliable). The sources don't have to be in English, either. But even with reliable sources, the topic may just not be notable enough yet to have a separate Wikipedia article.

Since you're a new user, I recommend getting advice from others or asking questions at the Teahouse if you want to improve the article further. I hope this helps. - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is to delete the article. Will this happen? Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please do not remove tags from this article again. It’s clear you don’t really understand what is required in terms of sourcing and are not able to improve the article yourself. That’s fine. You don’t need to do anything except leave it alone. Other editors will see it and if they can improve it, they will. Removing tags as you are doing is considered disruptive editing and if you do it again I will ask an admin to give you a warning. Mccapra (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you My concern is to delete the article. Will this happen?

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not immediately, no. Other editors will look at it and someone else may add reliable sources. The best thing you can do to have the tags removed is to find reliable independent sources, not interviews, performance videos or music distribution sites. If not, just be patient. Mccapra (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to edit it yourself? And add to those resources?

Because I'm worried that no one will be able to help me and the article will be damaged

Edit it yourself if you can

Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Hazhar Saleh

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hazhar Saleh a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hazhar Saleh. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Owlf (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hazhar Saleh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazhar Saleh, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazhar Saleh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussions remain open for seven days, more than the three you have requested. Mccapra (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can vote?

Please Education me Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 10:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diba Zahedi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diba Zahedi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diba Zahedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil 665 10:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Diba Zahedi. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 10:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Khatereh Asadi, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khatereh Asadi

Hello Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk · contribs)!

I noticed you deleted the AfD tag for Khatereh Asadi. It is vandalism and I have reverted it, and it would not stop the process for the deletion anyway. What could stop the deletion is to add more references to her article to establish her WP:NOTABILITY, hoping that she will pass WP:NACTOR and thus can be kept. I am also interested to rescue her article, but I do not understand Persian. Do you understand Persian? Thank you! SunDawn (talk) 13:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm iranian and my Mother tongue Persian

Please help me for protect article Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! To establish notability we need to show that she has played on multiple movies or theaters to pass WP:NACTOR. There are lots of her movies in the article that are unreferenced, could you provide references for them? Also, if there is any movie that is not listed, can you put them on the article?

Try to use sources that are verifiable and reliable, so do not use blogs or Wordpress sites. Iranian sources can be used. SunDawn (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC) (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure . The best reference imdb

And she have page on imdb and Is available movie

And Can I contact you to exchange information and get more guidance? On any platform you want WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, etc. Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I ask you to guide me in this because I am worried about the article. Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! IMDB is not the best source, as it is generally not trusted. The best source you can get is sources from Iranian news sites. Make sure it is reliable and verifiable. I am sorry but I wouldn't want to communicate outside Wikipedia. Are you using computer to edit? Or you are using mobile phones? Are you able to put references on the article? I will guide you based on the information. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 16:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm use mobile and I do not have the ability to refer

Can I refer you to the links? Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For this article I wanted to get in touch to give you the resources and edit it

I also have another article

My other article is called: Diba Zahedi Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 16:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can refer me the links. You can put the links here and I will write it down to the article. I need more information on her personal life, do you have sources for them? Maybe her family, what is her political stance, what is interesting about her outside filming? Also, have I listed all of her movies? And what is her most famous movies/TV series? SunDawn (talk) 02:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn Hello good time If I give you a person's resume, will you write an article for that person? Article source is also available.

Name of the person: Majid Mozaffari Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Behrad Shahriari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Behrad Shahriari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Diba Zahedi, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove AfD templates under the guise of 'the poll swinging towards keep anyway', which would be a ridiculous assertion to make in this case anyway given the ratio of delete to keep votes is currently at 6 to 1. nearlyevil 665 12:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ok. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 12:59, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Roozbeh Moeini. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Roozbeh Moeini that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Specifically this edit summary where you attack CommanderWaterford GPL93 (talk) 15:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aliasghar ghorbandokht. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Behrad Shahriari, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aliasghar ghorbandokht. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aliasghar ghorbandokht|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why add tag? Article good reference and very strong Please Give reasons for your claim that the article was deleted immediately Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As an old user, you should be a fan of new writers Delete their articles quickly. I did not expect that from you

Please remove the tag forever and prove your good faith Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Aliasghar ghorbandokht, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aliasghar ghorbandokht|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak good English

Please send me persian Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behrad Shahriari has been totally inappropriate. You have clearly logged 4 keep votes in an attempt to game the system. It is quite clear from your editing that you are attempting to promote Behrad Shahriari. Every link that you have added to the article is a spam music download link. The page is an advertisement. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry I will not do this again No This page is not an ad Rather, a page is required for this person's Google resume and confirmation on Instagram. And that this person will soon perform on several reputable television channels. I made this article in advance so that people do not get misinformation. Because with their fame, identity forgery increases. Please understand Thanks

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CNK_HseFty_/?igshid=1g10jlr3s972n

This post is proof of my point. This person performs on one of the most reputable TV channels The number of performances will increase soon

Believe me, my goal is not propaganda or sabotage

I just need help to memorize the article Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello good time If I give you a person's resume, will you write an article for that person? Article source is also available.

Name of the person: Majid Mozaffari Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Khatereh Asadi. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roozbeh Moeini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roozbeh Moeini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roozbeh Moeini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil 665 05:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello good time If I give you a person's resume, will you write an article for that person? Article source is also available.

Name of the person: Majid Mozaffari Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Behrad Shahriari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Behrad Shahriari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aliasghar ghorbandokht. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Behrad Shahriari, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why add tag? Article good reference and very strong Please Give reasons for your claim that the article was deleted immediately Aliasghar ghorbandokht

As an old user, you should be a fan of new writers Delete their articles quickly. I did not expect that from you

Please remove the tag forever and prove your good faith Aliasghar ghorbandokht 2021

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 17:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Behrad Shahriari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behrad Shahriari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behrad Shahriari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Chenari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Chenari, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

تعارض منافع احتمالی

@Spiderone با سلام، این کاربرعزیزمان به شما گفته اند که تعارض احتمالی منافع یا ویرایش با پرداخت اگر انجام میدهید را اعلام کنید. چون همه ویرایش های شما تبلیغاتی است و بنابراین لازم است که هرگونه ارتباط خود را به منتفعین یا پرداخت کنندگان احتمالی از طریق ویکی پدیا فاش کنند. چون شما ادعا می کند که متوجه نشدید پیام ایشان را. برای همین بنده ترجمه کردم براتون. Shahram 13:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

عزیزدل واقعا اینطور نیست من هزینه دریافت نمیکنم من یک برنامه نویس هستم ک ممکن است با بعصی از ارتیست ها همکاری کنم اونم ن از نظر مالی بلکه از نظر ثبت رزومه در‌گوکل من سعی میکنم مقاله بی طرف و مفید باشه سالم بودن مقاله در اولیت من است Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 15:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone اینکه باهاشون همکاری میکنید هم به نوعی تعارض منافع میشه و برای همین بهتره اعلام کنید تا در جریان باشند و مشکلی پیش نیاد. تعارض منافع اگر اعلام بشه مشکلی نداره ولی اگر اعلام نشه ممکنه باهاتون برخورد بشه و محدودیت دسترسی قالل شوند. برای همین هر کدام را اعلام کنید که باهاشون همکاری میکنید نهایتا چک میشه که مقاله بیطرف بشه . Shahram 06:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

روزبه معینی بهراد شهریاری افرادی هستند ک کار میکنم Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello good time If I give you a person's resume, will you write an article for that person? Article source is also available.

Name of the person: Majid Mozaffari Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderone Hello good time If I give you a person's resume, will you write an article for that person? Article source is also available.

Name of the person: Majid Mozaffari Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Thank you for accepting my request. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No chance at this time. You've worked hard to demonstrate you cannot be trusted. Your best bet, though given your long history of abuse I'll warn you your chances are slim, is to wait six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. I'll warn you, you've been abusive enough that you may now be considered banned by the community, in which case you'll need to read and follow the instructions at WP:UNBAN. First, though, six months with zero edits. Yamla (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed Thank you for accepting my request. Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Star Mississippi 01:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed Thank you for accepting my request. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

{{unblock|reason=Hello

I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked.

I really regret my work

Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account

Thank you for accepting my request.

Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed Thank you for accepting my request. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

one at a time, again Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed Thank you for accepting my request. Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were told on 6 January to take the standard offer - i.e. wait 6 months without making any edits from any account or anonymously, yet you have failed to do this. I am resetting the timer - if you make no edits before 29 July 2022 you may appeal again. This is by no means guaranteed to be successful, but is your only chance. — Voice of Clam 09:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello

I found out that you offered 6 months of inactivity

But it really is a long time I ask you to solve the problem as soon as possible I promise not to violate anymore I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked.

I really regret my work

Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past

All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed

Thank you for accepting my request. Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not being unblocked without observing the standard offer. The timer is now reset, you must wait until August 6. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

STOP

Stop soliciting people to edit on your behalf. This is inappropriate. Your six month timer resets; you are now not eligible for the standard offer until 2022-09-20. At that point, you'll need to address your attempt to use other editors to proxy-edit on your behalf. --Yamla (talk) 07:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aliasghar ghorbandokht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I apologize to the admins for creating recurring accounts even though I was blocked. I really regret my work Please free my account so that I can be useful in Wikipedia and I will only use this account Because of a mistake in the past All my efforts in the present and in the future have been destroyed Thank you for accepting my request. Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What about Amir ghpro, who claimed not to be your sock? That was less than six months ago. Why do people have to constantly explain the standard offer to you? It is six months without any sock puppetry, block evasion, or other attempts to edit Wikipedia. Also, how is Special:Diff/1079063989 a useful edit? Please explain that in your next unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, you will need to address your attempt to use other editors to proxy-edit on your behalf. 331dot (talk) 18:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can now use Wikipedia? Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 10:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. You are still blocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amir ghpro (talk · contribs) last edited on 12 April 2022, before being blocked as a sockpuppet of this user. This was within the Standard Offer period. Therefore I do not feel an unblock would be appropriate. However as I have already declined once, I will leave it to another admin to decide. — Voice of Clam 17:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]