User talk:Asenine/Archive 18

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Asenine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Regarding Doug's alleged salty language

Sorry to intrude, but I responded to your concerns about what you felt was Doug's cobalt blue language in his message to a rowdy editor. Doug seems to be offline for a while, but I checked it out and Doug is not to blame. More info here: [[1]]. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Just to say hai

Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 09:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Regarding the page SubtractiveLAD, which you tagged for speedy deletion on the basis of an article about band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article claims that the band has released four albums, which is an assertion of importance. If you still want the page to be deleted, please re-tag it under a CSD criterion that applies, consider redirecting the article, or use the proposed deletion or the articles for deletion processes. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

That is not an assertion of notability at all. I have re-added it, please read WP:MUSIC for more information. asenine ^{say what?} 16:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I am well aware of WP:MUSIC. An article about a band does not need to meet WP:MUSIC to avoid deletion under CSD:A7, it merely has to contain an assertion, of any type, that the band is notable. A quotation from WP:CSD: "to avoid speedy deletion an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, just give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable". Please feel free to use a prod or AFD for this article. Stifle (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

It does not contain an assertion of why it might be notable. 4 albums is nowhere in the inclusion criteria, and there is nothing in the article that suggests that it should be included. I will not readd it for now, but will later unless you can explain to me what you consider to be an assertion of possible notability (since having 4 albums is not one). Have a nice day. :) asenine ^{say what?} 16:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Again, the speedy deletion criteria and criteria for inclusion are completely distinct. An article with the text "Weehaa is an up and coming band in Anywhereville, working on its first EP, here are the members and here is our myspace page" is eligible for speedy deletion. A page needs to be devoid of any actual or potential indication of notability to qualify for speedy deletion. If there is a claim, however tenuous, that the subject is notable, then it does not qualify for speedy deletion. That does not mean that it is notable enough to be included, merely that the speedy deletion process is not appropriate for it. I have listed the article at AFD, which is the next appropriate step in the deletion process. Thank you for your understanding. Stifle (talk) 08:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Not Neccesery

I have been on wikipedia for a very long time making very helpful contributions why don't you read the discussion page on the article on which i made!.I am not a vandal if anything you should try to learn a few things and not bitting at people who are trying to contribute to wikipedia.

The way it sound you make it sound like a am take a look at my contributions and you are bitting by the way no reason to use the template. I am not a vandal!

Staffwaterboy ^Talk ^Guestbook 16:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Thats what is sounds like to me if i am being threatened to be block anyways [2]

:) i am citing source from other wikipedia articles

Staffwaterboy ^Talk ^Guestbook 17:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed however there are other templates that can be used instead like the level 1 or 2.

Staffwaterboy ^Talk ^Guestbook 17:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Understandable the first time i made it i did not have time to cite the information but it is rather annoying when making a legit article i am at school and i am very busy.

Ps i cited the article

Staffwaterboy ^Talk ^Guestbook 17:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks