User talk:Aslanstatistic123

Aslanstatistic123, you are invited to the Co-op!

Hi there! Aslanstatistic123, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013–present)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013–present) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~ NottNott let's talk! contrib 13:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly desist

If you keep vandalising pages with your POV edits, I will report you and you will run the risk of getting blocked, first temporarily and then permanently. And spare us both the accusation that Wikipedia is some kind of a PKK support site, others of your ilk have tried and failed with that ludicrous angles. Akerbeltz (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

User block notice - Three revert rule

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Adıyaman Province. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Stifle (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mehmet Oz, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Your recent editing history at Afsharid dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- LouisAragon (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. - LouisAragon (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Athenean (talk) 03:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Komotini. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 12:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aslanstatistic123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aslanstatistic123. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malatya Province, you may be blocked from editing. Semsûrî (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Malatya Province) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ds alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—valereee (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —valereee (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editor has never edited a talk page, including their own. After being blocked from a page on which they were edit warring, they commenced a mass removal of categories from Kurdish-related articles. I've block from article space to see if we can get their attention. No objection to any other admin lifting the block if you feel you've gotten through to this editor. —valereee (talk) 16:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aslanstatistic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Aslanstatistic123 (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Semsûrî adds proviences that doesnt have Kurdish majority to Turkish Kurdistan category and do misinformation abaout etnic regions of Turkey.And i dont know how to use Wikpedia and my english is not good,i can do mistakes but everytime i do a edit i try to add source and this edits are everyone who lives in this region knows.For example Semsuri claims İn Malatya most of Alevis are Kurdish.Correcting this misinformations are not disruption he alo adds Turkish majority places in Kurdish settlements category.Aslanstatistic123 (talk) 16:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not sufficient. That's not how Wikipedia works. --Yamla (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Aslanstatistic123! Thanks for coming here. The place to settle content disputes is at article talk pages, such as Talk:Malatya Province. When you make a change that you believe is an improvement, go to the talk page, open a section, ping the person who reverted you, and explain why you believe the edit was an improvement. If you believe they've added something that is not correct, ask for their sources for the addition. But simply reverting their edits over and over isn't okay. Our policy requires that you not revert another editor more than three times, at the absolute maximum, and best-practices is to only revert once, then go to the talk page.

As you can imagine, the topic of Kurds and Kurdistan is extremely contentious here on Wikipedia. Newer editors and extremely contentious topics are a very bad combination. I would highly recommend that you edit in some non-contentious areas while you learn our policies (such as about edit-warring).

If you insist upon continuing to edit in Kurds/Kurdistan: Removing content with no explanation, as you did with those removals of categories, is likely to get you topic-banned from the entire subject of Kurds and Kurdistan. In contentious areas, it's best to go to the talk page first, open a section, explain your proposed changes, then circle back in a week to see if anyone has objected, and then if no one has, then make the changes. To work in contentious areas, you need to be extremely patient.

Do you understand all of that? —valereee (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aslanstatistic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay i guess i learned how to use wikipedia so i demand unblock from editing pages.Aslanstatistic123 (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please demonstrate your knowledge on using Wikipedia by telling how you will handle editing disputes. 331dot (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How?Aslanstatistic123 (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AS123, discuss what you did that got you blocked, why you now see that wasn't the way to handle it, and what you will do instead in the future. (Also FWIW, in English "demand" is seen as a bit rude. I don't know if one of your languages is French, but the English equivalent of 'demander' is 'to request'.) —valereee (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wont do too much edit in same page,if i do i am going to write my reasons to talk page.Aslanstatistic123 (talk) 20:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]