User talk:HedgeHogPower

HedgeHogPower, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HedgeHogPower! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School

Don't ever copy someone's signature. Your edit made it appear that I wrote something on this talk page that I did not. And copying your signature from a different page made it appear that you edited this talk page days before you actually did. Meters (talk) 00:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in your history trail, you will see that at 23:35, 6 November 2016 you did write:

"It was not deleted. It was redirected as per normal for non-notable middle schools. You recreated it under a different, invalid, name, leaving us with two different articles. Teh valid name is a redirect, and your new article has an invalid name (there is no comma in the school's name). I'm going to redirect this the correct name, which is where you should create the article if you think the school is notable. I'm not moving it myself since I'm not convinced this school is notable."

I was trying to keep the conversation about this school in one place. As you noted, there shouldn't have been a comma in the name of the school, resulting in two different pages. Is there a way to move the previous conversation to the current page?HedgeHogPower (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "Don't ever copy someone's signature" did you not understand?

I know very well that I wrote it, but as I said, I didn't write it on the page you moved it to. I was referring to the new page you made. If I had wanted my comment on the other page I would have put it there. A signature means that the editor listed wrote the content when and where the signature was added. You copied the thread to a different page, including my signature. Don't do that. If you want to refer to something that is on a different talk page then you can link to the entire page (Talk:Johnnie_L._Cochran_Jr.,_Middle_School), link to the specific thread on the page (Talk:Johnnie_L._Cochran_Jr.,_Middle_School#recreation since you didn't use a header I've added one for this example), link to a diff of a particular edit ([1]) or to a series of edits ([2]), or quote parts of the comment. If you quote a comment then use quotation marks or {{tq|quote}} and make it very clear what you are doing.

There are very limited cases where it is appropriate to move a comment including a signature, but this was not such a case and you are not experienced enough to do so. Meters (talk) 03:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

multiple articles on same school

Stop editing the Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School articles until I get this cleaned up. Don't copy anything and don't move anything. Just leave it all alone until this mess is fixed. You have now turned the redirect Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School into an article, and that's OK. If the school is notable enough to warrant an article then that is the correct title. You created another copy of the article at the incorrect title Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., Middle School which I temporarily redirected to the school board. You created a third copy of the article at at the incorrect title Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School (Los Angeles) (there is only one Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School so there is no need to disambiguate the name. You created a fourth copy of the article at the incorrect title Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School (Los Angeles) - (formerly Mount Vernon Middle School) which is an even worse title. Not only does it have an unnecessary disambiguation but it includes the former name of the school. This last one now redirects but to Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School (Los Angeles) rather than the correct title. To top it all off, you made a cut and paste move in there somewhere and lost the edit history of the original material. There is content in those articles that was not written by you, but we can't tell from the edit history. That is not acceptable. I am going to ask to have the three incorrect titles deleted sinc enone of them are appropriate redirects.

Please don't create incorrect new names for existing articles, and don't recreate existing articles under new names. Meters (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

speedies

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., Middle School

A tag has been placed on Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., Middle School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 04:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello HedgeHogPower, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. You cannot copy verbatim from online sources. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franz Allers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paint Your Wagon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The World Of Steve & Eydie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lead Me On. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please see Help:Referencing for beginners --Jennica✿ / ^talk 20:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jennica Could you be more specific...what did I do wrong?

HedgeHogPower (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HedgeHogPower. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HedgeHogPower. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]