User talk:Nthep/Archive 32
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nthep. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2019
| The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
10:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Vandal
After you blocked Sygurdpodroznikkk IP editor 85.114.55.126 returned to The Super Fight to make the same edit with another abusive edit summary. Dharmalion76 (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- dealt with, thanks. Nthep (talk) 22:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
Technical news
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
Arbitration
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Miscellaneous
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Real Life Barnstar |
| Thank you for helping out at the University of Leeds event, I hope you found it as much fun as I did! Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hey, can you verify that this account is legitimate and is an alternative account that you created? Your logs don't show that you created this account. Instead, it was created on its own... Please let me know as soon as possible. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: it's mine. I deliberately went through the new account process as part of a training exercise. Nthep (talk) 11:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for letting me know. I'll unblock the account now. Sorry for getting in the way; I just see a lot of impersonation attempts like this that LTAs try to pull. I just want to be safe and make sure... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Done. Account is unblocked. Thanks again! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- No worries and thanks for the vigilance. Nthep (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- No problem; always happy to have your back and keep an eye out for my fellow editors and admins. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- No worries and thanks for the vigilance. Nthep (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for letting me know. I'll unblock the account now. Sorry for getting in the way; I just see a lot of impersonation attempts like this that LTAs try to pull. I just want to be safe and make sure... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2019
| The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
14:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
Llannerch
Hello Nthep
I noticed you have tagged my page for Llannerch for deletion. I have just checked around for reliable sources and have found one which proves the area is classed as a village. https://www.streetcheck.co.uk/postcode/ll170bb.
<remove the part I can read by following the link>
So this which handles postcodes confirms the area in and around Llannerch Park and Hall as a village. The following source also confirms this: https://www.doogal.co.uk/ShowMap.php?postcode=LL17%200BD and https://checkmypostcode.uk/ll170bd confirm the status of village. So I will be adding these in on the page and the deletion article page. If they say village, and are post codes. They then confirm it. Plus 70 people live around the park. Almost a hamlet population.
- replied at the AFD. Nthep (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Rusty but still wondering
I'm a bit rusty coming back from a long (much needed) absence, so you may have this right and I may be off the mark... but, as an admin (who is simply refraining from requesting for the admin flag back for a while) and current OTRS member, I thought that any instance of copyrighted material being used in violation of the NFCCP and in violation of the content's licensing, was considered blatant copyright violations. This is the same reasoning I used for the revdel request you fulfilled without issue at Carlos Ghosn, I just used slightly different wording in the edit summaries for the tags. Am I missing something? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: The Ghosn one wasn't a problem, the quote was completely irrelevant. This one I'm not sure is as clear cut and some people may wish to pursue the line that the quote is the best way to make the point and that it does meet NFCCP#1. If there's a consensus that the quote doesn't meet NFCCP#1 then it's open to reconsideration whether to revdel or not. Nthep (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Roger that, and thank you for the refresher/clarification. I will go poll the talk page now. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 17:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: Give it 7 days, if there is no response or a consensus is reached, then I'll revdel. This is the same timeframe allowed for orphaned revisions of images so I think it's fair to treat text in the same way. Nthep (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- It looks like the only consensus there will be limited but at least so far unanimous... obviously you can wait until later today as pre-discussed to make any move (if you feel that necessary), I just wanted to give you a heads up that I found and changed/removed additional copyvios that are quite clearly even more blatant violations than I first found. After a search with WikiBlame it appears the edits were added here. I'll go ahead and ping GoldbergHistory (talk · contribs), the editor who added the copyvio, so that they're aware of the issue here as well (not to be mean, I just want them to be aware of why such quoting without attribution at all is not acceptable per WP:COPYVIO). Would you like me to poll the talk page on this one too, or do you think these violations were bad enough to just warrant automatic revdel in this case? (I would have just used the revdel template at the page but I didn't want you to think I was forum-shopping or disrespecting your authority here in any way, as these much older copyvios technically would cause all of the edits I previously requested to be removed via revdel too.) — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: thanks for the update. This article is looking more and more like a deep hole of copyvios :-( See what GoldberHistory has to say and we'll take it from there. Thanks for the consideration too, I appreciate that but I wouldn't have seen it as forum-shopping or disrepect had you tagged it again without telling me first. Nthep (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately that may be true. All I can do at this point is take them as I find them. I've sent an email to GoldbergHistory requesting they come comment here, but seeing as they don't seem to be a very active editor (12 edits since 2017) I have no idea how long that might take. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: thanks for the update. This article is looking more and more like a deep hole of copyvios :-( See what GoldberHistory has to say and we'll take it from there. Thanks for the consideration too, I appreciate that but I wouldn't have seen it as forum-shopping or disrepect had you tagged it again without telling me first. Nthep (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- It looks like the only consensus there will be limited but at least so far unanimous... obviously you can wait until later today as pre-discussed to make any move (if you feel that necessary), I just wanted to give you a heads up that I found and changed/removed additional copyvios that are quite clearly even more blatant violations than I first found. After a search with WikiBlame it appears the edits were added here. I'll go ahead and ping GoldbergHistory (talk · contribs), the editor who added the copyvio, so that they're aware of the issue here as well (not to be mean, I just want them to be aware of why such quoting without attribution at all is not acceptable per WP:COPYVIO). Would you like me to poll the talk page on this one too, or do you think these violations were bad enough to just warrant automatic revdel in this case? (I would have just used the revdel template at the page but I didn't want you to think I was forum-shopping or disrespecting your authority here in any way, as these much older copyvios technically would cause all of the edits I previously requested to be removed via revdel too.) — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 03:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: Give it 7 days, if there is no response or a consensus is reached, then I'll revdel. This is the same timeframe allowed for orphaned revisions of images so I think it's fair to treat text in the same way. Nthep (talk) 18:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Roger that, and thank you for the refresher/clarification. I will go poll the talk page now. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 17:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just checking back in on this. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Coffee: it looks like this has run its course. Have you got a first and last revision for revdel and I'll sort it out? Nthep (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, here is the first revision (788725283) and here is the last revision (929327263). — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 18:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thaks - all done. Nthep (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Nthep! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 19:17, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thaks - all done. Nthep (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, here is the first revision (788725283) and here is the last revision (929327263). — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 18:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2019
| The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
02:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
about This Revert
David Is Me And I Exist, I’m Not A Robot The Page Shouldn’t Be Deleted SteaminThomasTheTrain32 (talk) 16:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- dealt with. Nthep (talk) 16:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Rationale use for specific logo
Hello, about your reversion of my edit on 2019 RFL League 1, I'd like you let me know why the Betfred League logo is used on a single season article instead of being on the League main page. My question comes from the fact that it is the logo of the league, not the emblem of an individual season.
Thanks in advance, - Fma12 (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Fma12: you can put the logo on whichever article you think is best - I would point out that Betfred have not been the only sponsor of League 1, they are just the current one - however you removed one of the logos current uses but deleted both fair use rationales and didn't add a rationale for use on League 1 (rugby league). If you're going to do it please finish the job and not leave it half done with a logo hanging around without a rationale and/or use. Nthep (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)